• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Our military is voting in support of the war...

fromtheright

<img src =/2844.JPG>
poncho,

Did Fox News happen to mention that soldiers have a choice of either re enlisting and getting a cash bonus to stay deployed in Iraq at the end of their hitch or face a stop loss and remain deployed in Iraq anyway without a cash bonus at the end of their hitch?

I guess that explains the high morale. :rolleyes:
 

fromtheright

<img src =/2844.JPG>
The war is an outlet for those who like to break things and kill people. Pays better than a street gang.

It's comments like this that make it so easy to ignore billwald's posts.
 

emeraldctyangel

New Member
From, not sure from your first post which side of the fence you are on, but the Selective Reenlistment Bonus benefits are not given so you stay in Iraq longer. Most military eligible for this bonus WANT to reenlist in Iraq (of Afghanistan). Reason? Two words: TAX EXEMPT.

Any other time we get our bonus checks minus 28% to Uncle Sam.

We go wherever we are ordered. We dont get a lump of cash for agreeing to do what no other Soldier, Sailor, Marine, or Airman would.
 

elijah_lives

New Member
I know plenty of soldiers (relatives included) who are not eligible for bonuses, but re-enlist anyway. I received a bonus on my last tour, but that's not the reason I raised my hand. It is a sense of duty to our nation, drilled into me from youth by my parents. This is frequently (not always) the reason behind ANYBODY who re-enlists. They already know the hardships, risks, separation from loved ones, and meager pay in store for them -- so they would not agree to a continuation of these things without some fundamental beliefs of duty to others being behind it.
 

poncho

Well-Known Member
Originally posted by emeraldctyangel:
Well poncho...what IS your source then? I posted plenty of info and a link for you to click at your leisure and I am trying to give you the benefit of the doubt about how I, a US Service Member, by accepting a cash bonus to remain in the military for a little longer, is being blackmailed. Please enlighten me.
??? Did I say anyone was being blackmailed by excepting a cash bonus? To my knowledge...no. Your missing the whole point. I have no problem with a cash bonus to reenlist. It's the stop loss program that is being used to blackmail IMHO.

SOURCE

SOURCE

SOURCE

SOURCE

SOURCE

SOURCE

SOURCE

SOURCE

SOURCE

SOURCE

SOURCE

SOURCE

SOURCE

SOURCE

SOURCE

SOURCE

SOURCE

SOURCE

SOURCE

SOURCE

SOURCE

SOURCE

Eight soldiers who are currently abroad longer than their specified tour of duty are suing the military over the "stop loss" program created during the course of the Persian Gulf War. The stop loss program states any soldier who is abroad must stay with his or her entire unit until the unit's time is over - even if the soldier's enlistment contract is up. It prevents units from losing members and being unable to find replacements during a time when troops are already overextended.

The lawsuit has been filed in regular U.S. courts. The matter concerns military affairs, yet the military courts could not judge in an unbiased manner. The soldiers who fall into the stop loss program receive no extra compensation for staying longer than their contract specifies. If this were a nonmilitary situation, the person would have to receive some form of compensation, or else he or she would immediately leave.

Although the nature of the military is fundamentally different than that of a regular job, it still must be seen as a job for its soldiers. Military officials are violating contractual agreements with the stop loss program, which would not be tolerated elsewhere. Furthermore, if soldiers are so upset that they feel the need to sue the military - and the United States simultaneously boasts of having an all-volunteer army - the country is clearly being hypocritical.
SOURCE

SOURCE

Let me say it once again for you guys. I am not opposed to a reenlistment bonus.

If Uncle Sam wants you to stay he can use the stop loss program to threaten you into reenlistment. If you know your staying anyway why not just take the easy way and sign the reenlistment paper and collect a cash bonus?

Like I said, there are many sources along with my own personal experience as a soldier, the opinions of soldiers I served with and of the recruitment practices that soldiers often complained about.

Sorry Carpro, I haven't got the time to read each one of these sources for you, but I did find time to post a few...just a few. ;)
 

fromtheright

<img src =/2844.JPG>
ECA,

I'm nowhere near a fence, but I'm on the side that is in favor of our being there and being in support of the mission.
 

carpro

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Originally posted by poncho:
Originally posted by emeraldctyangel:
[qb] Well poncho...what IS your source then? I posted plenty of info and a link for you to click at your leisure and I am trying to give you the benefit of the doubt about how I, a US Service Member, by accepting a cash bonus to remain in the military for a little longer, is being blackmailed. Please enlighten me.

Sorry Carpro, I haven't got the time to read each one of these sources for you, but I did find time to post a few...just a few. ;)
Thanks for doing what you should have done in the first place. Make an assertion as fact. Be prepared to back it up. Simple rule but effective for rumormongers and anecdotal posters.
 

emeraldctyangel

New Member
Uh no. The stop loss is an order. It means you cant leave even if you are ready for retirement or at the end of your enlistment and you get no money. There is NO reenlistment as all contracts are automatically extended until further notice. Try putting on a uniform and experiencing stop loss before you attempt at posing as an expert.

The last stop loss I remember personally experiencing was in 91, when I could not even execute my permanent change of station orders. Everybody stayed put. And that was during the Gulf War which was 14 years ago? It lasted for a whole of 6 months and after that, life was normal.

No amount of linkage will prove that differently as you are WRONG. Besides that, you barely read any of the links you posted. Had you, you would have seen that none of them required a person to sign anything or agree to anything in exchange for money. That isnt blackmail or even extortion. That is simply the needs of the military. Hate to point it out, but some of your links were incredibly old (2001) and they just dont apply today. Sorry, you are barking at the wind.

wavey.gif
 

poncho

Well-Known Member
Originally posted by emeraldctyangel:
Uh no. The stop loss is an order. It means you cant leave even if you are ready for retirement or at the end of your enlistment and you get no money. There is NO reenlistment as all contracts are automatically extended until further notice. Try putting on a uniform and experiencing stop loss before you attempt at posing as an expert.

The last stop loss I remember personally experiencing was in 91, when I could not even execute my permanent change of station orders. Everybody stayed put. And that was during the Gulf War which was 14 years ago? It lasted for a whole of 6 months and after that, life was normal.

No amount of linkage will prove that differently as you are WRONG. Besides that, you barely read any of the links you posted. Had you, you would have seen that none of them required a person to sign anything or agree to anything in exchange for money. That isnt blackmail or even extortion. That is simply the needs of the military. Hate to point it out, but some of your links were incredibly old (2001) and they just dont apply today. Sorry, you are barking at the wind.

wavey.gif
"Try putting on a uniform and experiencing stop loss before you attempt at posing as an expert."

I've worn the uniform. Expert? Me? That's rich after reading your posts here, so where's the sources to back up your great knowledge, or do we all just take your word because your a Bush supporter?
 

elijah_lives

New Member
Found this on Foxnews.com, foxnews dtd today:

"The general did say the Army has surpassed its re-enlistment projections so far for fiscal year 2005. The Army's active duty re-enlistment rate is 107 percent of projected estimates, with 58,480 soldiers re-enlisting between Oct. 1, 2004 and July 31, 2005. The Army was hoping to re-enlist 54,510 soldiers during that time. Lovelace said the Army National Guard and Reserve re-enlistment rates are also exceeding 100 percent of projections."



and a little about the interview with Ralph Peters (the source I couldn't recall)


Still can't find a transcript, though. (Sorry, I can't seem to post the web address correctly )
 

emeraldctyangel

New Member
Originally posted by poncho:
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />
wavey.gif
"Try putting on a uniform and experiencing stop loss before you attempt at posing as an expert."

I've worn the uniform. Expert? Me? That's rich after reading your posts here, so where's the sources to back up your great knowledge, or do we all just take your word because your a Bush supporter? [/QB]</font>[/QUOTE]Where are the sources to back up my statements? What would you prefer, a copy of my LES or my reenlistment contracts? Your choice.


I support and defend the Constitution of the United States of America...President Bush seems to do just fine without my commentary about him.
 

Brother Ian

Active Member
I can only speak for myself and those I have directly served with over the last 22 years of active duty.

I am a submariner who has spent 10 of my 19 years of marriage away from my family. I am a volunteer who willingly separated myself from my family because it was my duty. Back in 1983 when I enlisted, I did it to get out on my own. The first time I reenlisted it was to be eligible for shore duty. The reasons for reenlisting the other four times are varied. I did receive a cash bonus (SRB) for three of five reenlistments. The total sum of my SRBs pale in comparison to what our highly trained, highly efficient, and highly motivated sailors are now getting for one reenlistment.

In my specialty (nuclear power), sailors are receiving up to $100,000 for reenlisting for four years. Can you put a price on voluntarily separating yourself form your family and placing yourself in harm's way? I don't think you can.

There are some that reenlist soley for the money. The average enlisted sailor with about two years in the Navy makes just over $20,000 a year.

Over the years, I have developed a deeper committment to the United States and her people. It is an honor to serve a country this great and I would do it all over again. It is my duty and responsibility to defend this country against all those who threaten that freedom. America's veterans spilled their blood and lost their lives ensuring this freedom is enjoyed by her citizens. We will not waiver in the fight against the tyranny that oppresses that freedom.

If this sounds a bit over the top, I have earned the right to be passionate about America. If you are unwilling to put yourself in harm's way, do not criticize what I have given my life work to do.

Our men and women in the Armed Forces are not asked if they would like to go to war. They're not given a choice. They follow orders. The sailor on the deckplates or the soldier in the foxhole don't generally know the details of the big picture. They have to trust the leaders that God has appointed over them. All authority comes from God. Sometimes we have good leaders, sometimes we don't. Either way, the men and women in uniform are obligated to obey the orders of those over them.

The Lord has truly blessed me in my career. I am certain it is because I placed Him first in all that I did. In my career, some superiors have told me I was wrong to take the stands I have taken. I really believe the Lord blessed me because I would not compromise my position in Christ. Was I perfect? Absolutely not. In fact, I've made some serious blunders in my time, but God was always faithful to take care of me, my career, and my family. Including September 12th, 2001. Not the 11th? On the 11th I was recalled to my submarine, but we couldn't get underway until the 12th because the Navy was concerned about the safety of the submarine on the surface while transiting to our dive point. They were afraid another attack was possible. When I left, I was not sure if my family would be there when I came home. On the type of submarine I serve, we do not have the ability to communicate with our families like some do today. We were completely cut off from the real world and we still had to take care of our daily business. Yeah, it was tough, but God saw me through.

I am proud to be an American. I'm not proud of everything we do, but I am so blessed to live in the United States of America.

Sorry this was so long. Passion runs deep.
 

poncho

Well-Known Member
Originally posted by emeraldctyangel:
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by poncho:
"Try putting on a uniform and experiencing stop loss before you attempt at posing as an expert."

I've worn the uniform. Expert? Me? That's rich after reading your posts here, so where's the sources to back up your great knowledge, or do we all just take your word because your a Bush supporter?
</font>
Where are the sources to back up my statements? What would you prefer, a copy of my LES or my reenlistment contracts? Your choice.


I support and defend the Constitution of the United States of America...President Bush seems to do just fine without my commentary about him.

Ah, the old Ice Cream close eh? Attempting to limit my choices to only two that you pick. Nice try but I would like to see some links to sources other than just your personal opinions if that's to tough for you just tell us. All this "me patriot you not" stuff isn't working for you or Bush anymore.

I support and defend the Constitution of the United States of America
Oh and how exactly do you do that? By supporting a President and congress who doesn't? Looks to me like they would rather have unelected corporate heads dictating the rules of globalism to the American people and putting more power in the hands of the WTO, WHO, IMF and the UN than protecting the U.S. constituion. Not to mention the open borders.

I reckon that even you...an expert of one can see that without me having to post a hundred links for you. I mean if the U.S. Constitution really means more to you than just using a reference to it now and then to try and make your opponent in a debate look, unpatriotic. ;)
 

LadyEagle

<b>Moderator</b> <img src =/israel.gif>
3-page warning: This thread will be closed no sooner than 5:00 a.m. ET by one of the moderators.

Lady Eagle,
Moderator
flower.gif
 
Top