Palin linked to death threats against Obama

[NaasPreacher (C4K)]

Obama is a Marxist! That is a fact. His mentor in Hawaii was a Marxist. His associates at Columbia were Marxist. His buddy and mentor in Chicago was Marxist terrorist William Ayers. Obama has no problem with the murder of children, born or newborn.

The history of Marxism is one of mass murder. Simply look at the Russian Revolution, the Communists in China, Cambodia, North Korea, and Viet Nam.

The history of the abortionists in this country is mass murder, 50 million and counting. The reason some people on this forum hate Palin so much is she is strongly pro life and not ashamed to admit it. The reason for this topic is the same as the stories being spread by some RINO's and the leftist media. They are afraid of a strong conservative woman, in the mold of Margaret Thatcher.

In other words. don't criticise our gal, or you are a Commie?

 

[Revmitchell]

In other words. don't criticise our gal, or you are a Commie?

You are better than this.

 

[NaasPreacher (C4K)]

You are better than this.

What I said is simplification of what OR said.

The contention of the Economic Times is not justified, but that doesn't mean they support marxism as OR suggested.

 

[Revmitchell]

What I said is simplification of what OR said.

The contention of the Economic Times is not justified, but that doesn't mean they support marxism as OR suggested.

Obama is a Marxist regardless of economic times and that bit of fact has nothing to do with Palin or the op.

 

[NaasPreacher (C4K)]

Obama is a Marxist regardless of economic times and that bit of fact has nothing to do with Palin or the op.

My point exactly. This diversion had no point in this thread. My previous post made it clear how I feel about the Economic Times article. BY the way The Economic Times was not a generic term - it is the source of the article quoted in the OP.

 

[Crabtownboy]

My point exactly. This diversion had no point in this thread. My previous post made it clear how I feel about the Economic Times article. BY the way The Economic Times was not a generic term - it is the source of the article quoted in the OP.

The Economic Times is a widely read economic magazine published in India. It is not a sensationalist periodical. I do not know where they picked up the story. It has also been published in several UK newspapers that are also highly regarded.

I would like to know where the story orginiated.

 

[NaasPreacher (C4K)]

The Economic Times is a widely read economic magazine published in India. It is not a sensationalist periodical. I do not know where they picked up the story. It has also been published in several UK newspapers that are also highly regarded.

I would like to know where the story orginiated.

I would too. I just have a hard time accepting that the Secret Service actually blamed Gov Palin for increased threats on Obama.

Who in the Secret Service? Was it an official statement? An unnamed source? Something is fishy about this article.

 

[abcgrad94]

I am so sick of the leftist media....the NY Times tells the most lies of all, but the media is liberal in every way, just like the teacher's union.

Palin is not reponsible for anything a crazy person thinks or does.

Debbie Mc

Isn't it interesting the way they keep hammering at Palin? Their candidate won, so why all the focus on Palin? I think it's to throw off suspicion because there are SO MANY unanswered questions about Obama. It's just a tactic to distract us so we don't question bho's qualifications.

 

[OldRegular]

In other words. don't criticise our gal, or you are a Commie?

Criticize but don't lie about her!. Bush's presidency was destroyed by the lies of the leftist democrats and leftist media. Unfortunately he did not refute these lies.

I criticize Obama but no one can show where I lied about him.

 

[Crabtownboy]

Criticize but don't lie about her!. Bush's presidency was destroyed by the lies of the leftist democrats and leftist media. Unfortunately he did not refute these lies.

I criticize Obama but no one can show where I lied about him.

Bush destroyed his own presidency by making really stupid decisions and following the advice of hawks like Chaney and company.

 

[TomVols]

Dear left wingers,
You won. Your candidate won. You can stop bludgeoning McCain/Palin now, for the election is over.

Sincerely,
The American Public

 

[Dragoon68]

Dear left wingers,
You won. Your candidate won. You can stop bludgeoning McCain/Palin now, for the election is over.

Sincerely,
The American Public

If they stopped doing that they'd have to start talking about all the "great" things Obama is going to accomplish and the silence would kill them!

 

[abcgrad94]

:applause:

Dear left wingers,
You won. Your candidate won. You can stop bludgeoning McCain/Palin now, for the election is over.

Sincerely,
The American Public

:applause: BRAVO and AMEN!!!!:applause:

 

[Bible-boy]

This is not an attack on Palin because so many of us have been guilty of a lot more. It's really to show my agreement to a statement widcatcher made, "Killing a persons reputation based on falsehood is the equivalent of murder". and will add to his statement by saying "or will lead to murder". I think this story also says how careful we have to be in our attacks toward others. You never know whose listening, how much of it they will believe and how they will personally respond to the allegations.

You mean like when posted totally false and unsubstanciated claims that John McCain was responsible for the fire on the USS Forrestal? Or how about when you bore false witness against your conservative brothers and sisters in Christ basically claiming that they hate the lost so much so that they refuse to invite them to church? Would you now like retract those statements?

 

[OldRegular]

If they stopped doing that they'd have to start talking about all the "great" things Obama is going to accomplish and the silence would kill them!

Well Obama has told us time and again what he intends to do. Given his remarks to the Sodom by the Sea elites during the primary campaign he may first go after guns and the Bible!

 

[Bible-boy]

This is not an attack on Palin because so many of us have been guilty of a lot more. It's really to show my agreement to a statement widcatcher made, "Killing a persons reputation based on falsehood is the equivalent of murder". and will add to his statement by saying "or will lead to murder". I think this story also says how careful we have to be in our attacks toward others. You never know whose listening, how much of it they will believe and how they will personally respond to the allegations.

You mean like when posted totally false and unsubstantiated claims that John McCain was responsible for the fire on the USS Forrestal? Or how about when you bore false witness against your conservative brothers and sisters in Christ basically claiming that they hate the lost so much so that they refuse to invite them to church? Would you now like retract those statements?

Quoted myself here in order to correct a spelling error after the self-edit time had expired on the other post.:wavey:

 

[JustChristian]

Well Obama has told us time and again what he intends to do. Given his remarks to the Sodom by the Sea elites during the primary campaign he may first go after guns and the Bible!

What did your man George Bush do to further your "Christian agenda?"

 

[Bible-boy]

What did your man George Bush do to further your "Christian agenda?"

Let's see...

He signed legislation banning partial birth abortions, he stopped embryonic stem cell research, and he appointed two Supreme Court Justices who hold to an originalist position regarding the interpretation of the Constitution (meaning no legislation from the bench).

How's that for a start?

Wait don't answer this. You are driving the thread off top by diverting attention onto President Bush. Stay on topic please.

 

[LadyEagle]

Please stay on topic or this thread will be closed. Thanks. LE

 

[JustChristian]

Let's see...

He signed legislation banning partial birth abortions, he stopped embryonic stem cell research, and he appointed two Supreme Court Justices who hold to an originalist position regarding the interpretation of the Constitution (meaning no legislation from the bench).

How's that for a start?

Wait don't answer this. You are driving the thread off top by diverting attention onto President Bush. Stay on topic please.

What did he do in his second year?