Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
I hope nobody loses their lunch over this, but the Obama's made one of their rare appearances in church yesterday on Easter. The Pastor, Dr. Michael Bell, made the following statement about Obama, he is "the most intelligent, most anointed, most charismatic president."
Around Washington, D.C., it's considered bad form to point out that Bush doesn't regularly attend church. "You don't have to go to church to be a good religious person," argue his defenders.
http://atheism.about.com/b/2004/10/19/bush-doesnt-attend-church.htm
ROFL. Remember G. Bush's defenders on his not going to church often. If you don't remember here is a quote:
If it was bad form not to point that out about Bush, is it bad form now?
Fair is fair. If you are going to criticize one president then all presidents are fair game on the same subject. I was simply showing that what is good for the goose is good for the gander.Didn't you nearly rupture a spleen in another thread over posts you said were "off-topic?"
Does your intellectual dishonesty ever enter your thoughts?
This isn't about Bush. It's about Obama, and those who worship him (especially "ministers," though I use that term loosely).
Do you have anything pertinent to add? Or is re-direction the best you've got?
Fair is fair. If you are going to criticize one president then all presidents are fair game on the same subject. I was simply showing that what is good for the goose is good for the gander.
Oh, that is right, to some G. Bush is above criticism. :laugh:
By the way, how about telling others who derail threads with questions totally off topic the same as you told me. Thanks in advance.
He also called him "our black president" and said, "God has His hand all over you, Anyone would be foolish to come up against him."
I hope nobody loses their lunch over this, but the Obama's made one of their rare appearances in church yesterday on Easter. The Pastor, Dr. Michael Bell, made the following statement about Obama, he is "the most intelligent, most anointed, most charismatic president."
Fair is fair. If you are going to criticize one president then all presidents are fair game on the same subject. I was simply showing that what is good for the goose is good for the gander.
Oh, that is right, to some G. Bush is above criticism.
It isn't that Bush is above criticism, it's that we've already criticized him and don't see a need to criticize him every time we discuss Mao-Bama.
Of course, now if a president goes to church all kinds of hoops have to be jumped through for security reasons. If I were president I would have worship services either in the White House or at Camp David. How about you?
The Pastor, Dr. Michael Bell, made the following
statement about Obama, he is "the most intelligent,
most anointed, most charismatic president.":eek: "
Salty, I didn't comment on the preacher's comment. I guess the preacher can say anything he wants ... within some type of reason. The most intelligent, the most charismatic ... that is debatable really do not know what the preacher means when he said "the most anointed.Crabby, I agree with you on that point. If I remember correctly , that is one reason the other annoninted president - Ronald Regan did not norally attend public churches due to all the security required.
I remember shortly after his ignauration, it was mentioned he would normally attend services at Camp David. (If I recall, the Chaplain was Southern Baptist)
But the OP was not about BO attending church, it was about what the Pastor
said about BO. From post # 1
PHP:The Pastor, Dr. Michael Bell, made the following statement about Obama, he is "the most intelligent, most anointed, most charismatic president.":eek: "
Crabby, I'm not sure, but did you comment on the OP?
Salty
Why can't we discuss Obama without discussing Bush? The last time I checked George W. Bush is not currently the president, but rather Mr. Obama is. Why, then, in a thread discussing Mr. Obama, do we see Bush brought up? Is there some connection I'm failing to see? If you started a discussion on Bush (W.), would it be valid for me to suddenly bring in something pertaining to Clinton?
While Bush was president, when he was criticized by the democrats, Clinton was often brought up. But, now, Bush is off limits, strange.