1. Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Featured Paul's Model for Soul Winning

Discussion in 'General Baptist Discussions' started by Iconoclast, May 8, 2020.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. JonC

    JonC Moderator
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2001
    Messages:
    35,198
    Likes Received:
    3,791
    Faith:
    Baptist
    @Iconoclast

    Again, here is the quote in your own words so that you cannot say I made anything up or twisted what you have said. This is the quote....quoting you:

    Which is directly denied by Reformed.
    I ask this of you as this is the point of our disagreement as well. But in our conversations it seems you will agree with like minded people like @Reformed when they disagree with you but become hostile when I say the exact same thing.

    Thank you.

    John.
     
  2. JonC

    JonC Moderator
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2001
    Messages:
    35,198
    Likes Received:
    3,791
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Reformed,

    For "the record" and to make sure that we are clear here. (the reason being there seems to be a sense of "cultlish" or "campish" behavior that some identify and others deny).

    Are you saying that @Iconoclast claim that :when we witness to individuals we need to establish the bible as it is in truth, the word of God" is problematic?

    If so I agree.

    If not, then please stand firm on your statement. Too often it seems that you disagree with people but do so in a shrinking or silent way if they are in your camp (just my observation, which may or may not be true....your response, I suppose, will tell).
     
  3. JonC

    JonC Moderator
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2001
    Messages:
    35,198
    Likes Received:
    3,791
    Faith:
    Baptist
    @Reformed,

    My observation and concern here is that you quickly address those you disagree with who are not Calvinists, but you try to "soft coat" errors if Calvinists on this board.

    As an example, here you have proved @Iconoclast wrong. But you have done it in such a way he does not seem to realize the reality of the situation. In the past, we're Iconoclast not a Calvinist you would have confronted him "head
    on". But here @Iconoclast does not seem to even see you have rejected his theory because of your wording.

    Is there a reason you engage Christians so differently in this forum?

    I ask because lately it seems you only post to show mild support (I guess support in spirit) for Calvinists who have taken their philosophy to the point of apostasy. It seems like a sign of affirmation for the tean without actually supporting the things the member has affirmed (politics).

    The conclusion I am tempted to make is the disagreement with @Iconoclast / agreement with me is honest in its conclusion but perhaps less than honest in its presentation.

    This makes me wonder. Are you a Calvinist in terms of your religious politics above your allegiance to Christ?

    I hope you understand what I am asking and are able to reply appropriately.

    To clarify, your post stands in direct contrast to @Iconoclast 's philosophy that in witnessing to people we must establish that Scri is the Word of God.

    Have I misunderstood your position?

    In Christ,

    John
     
    • Funny Funny x 1
  4. JonC

    JonC Moderator
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2001
    Messages:
    35,198
    Likes Received:
    3,791
    Faith:
    Baptist
    @Reformed,


    I take your silence as an answer - that you do (by your own words) pronounce @Iconoclast 's throaty that to witness to others we must first establish Scripture as the Worf of God to be a false teaching.

    I agree. It is legalism and should not be entertained by believers.

    At the same time we value Scripture as God' s Word.

    As a target of @Iconoclast 's attempts at censorship I understand why you would not want to be vocal. But Scripture itself affirms your (our) position here.
     
    • Funny Funny x 1
  5. Iconoclast

    Iconoclast Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2010
    Messages:
    21,242
    Likes Received:
    2,305
    Faith:
    Non Baptist Christian
    I will answer this to show your errors shortly
     
  6. JonC

    JonC Moderator
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2001
    Messages:
    35,198
    Likes Received:
    3,791
    Faith:
    Baptist
    It was not a question. You chose to engage in ad honinem, forefieting any right to legitimate discussion.

    This post is an error but you could have defended your position or gave it up without becoming insulting to me.

    Again, here is the quote - your own words:

     
    • Funny Funny x 1
  7. Iconoclast

    Iconoclast Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2010
    Messages:
    21,242
    Likes Received:
    2,305
    Faith:
    Non Baptist Christian
    "Reformed,

    Thanks for this solid post and instructive input. I wanted to take this opportunity to clarify some of what I have posted as with the distractions going on it might have been obscured.

    I understand.

    I agree here as I posted earlier.God sends His word,

    8 For my thoughts are not your thoughts, neither are your ways my ways, saith the Lord.

    9 For as the heavens are higher than the earth, so are my ways higher than your ways, and my thoughts than your thoughts.

    10 For as the rain cometh down, and the snow from heaven, and returneth not thither, but watereth the earth, and maketh it bring forth and bud, that it may give seed to the sower, and bread to the eater:

    11 So shall my word be that goeth forth out of my mouth: it shall not return unto me void, but it shall accomplish that which I please, and it shall prosper in the thing whereto I sent it.

    Again I agree to a certain extent here, with the exception of what I bolded in red
    .

    Now I know I can take my time and clarify my answer to you because you are not playing any kind of twisted word games, looking for a "gotcha Post". You are not substituting any words to change the meaning and intent of what I posted, trying to make as if what I posted was a contradiction.
    No Reformed, we have posted back and forth many times and I am confident that if you have a bone to pick with me you will do so, from scripture and not from any bearing of false witness, dishonest posting, lying, gossip, or any such nonsense.
    I am confident that you post as a Christian Man, not a two-faced weasel. We do agree many times, and there are times where what I post and how I do it, may not be the path you would take, and that is fine.

    NOW You state;
    I agree with this as written, but qualify what I mean in this thread, in this way:
    Scripture is true and authoritative to all men, saved and unsaved.
    Now when I speak of a model and pattern used by The Apostles, I speak of the necessity of establishing the scriptures as the word of God, written.


    What do I mean? Am I as some might suggest contradicting myself? No, let me explain.
    As an unsaved person is was completely ignorant of the claims the bible made about itself. When a well-intentioned "soul winner" came my way, I would easily put them on the defensive by shifting the battle away from scriptural authority to an argument of who are you to inflict YOUR ideas on me or anyone else?
    As a new Christian trying to present the gospel I saw that many of the unsaved would offer intellectual arguments or religious ones, RC mythology and the like. It dawned on me I did the same thing when I was a non Christian rebel.
    Studying Hebrews 1;1-3 and hearing sermons on the topic , going to lively bible studies with saints who were more mature, speaking face to face with several godly pastors on this topic, I was able to see the flaws in what I was doing, then see the biblical truth unfolded
    .

    going to start part two here:
     
  8. Iconoclast

    Iconoclast Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2010
    Messages:
    21,242
    Likes Received:
    2,305
    Faith:
    Non Baptist Christian
    part2;
    .
    Agreed! It is so in truth..

    ,

    I have spoken with many , many people, mostly Catholics. They have no concept of scripture as the word of God, I am speaking about Jesus own words; for example;jn8
    43 Why do ye not understand my speech? even because ye cannot hear my word.

    44 Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it.

    45 And because I tell you the truth, ye believe me not.

    46 Which of you convinceth me of sin? And if I say the truth, why do ye not believe me?

    47 He that is of God heareth God's words: ye therefore hear them not, because ye are not of God.

    jn12:

    47 And if any man hear my words, and believe not, I judge him not: for I came not to judge the world, but to save the world.

    48 He that rejecteth me, and receiveth not my words, hath one that judgeth him: the word that I have spoken, the same shall judge him in the last day.


    The word of God is the word of God 24/7...but unsaved people mostly do not know it. They need to know they are going to be judged by the word on the last day. They need to understand the set up given in scripture.

    Then as we present truth from scripture, even if they do not believe it, you place that seed that it is not your opinion, or my opinion, but it is ...WHAT SAYETH THE SCRIPTURE?
    Then when we open a bible to selected verses, they can ponder what we say if the Spirit is drawing them.
    The word of God does not change at all, Their view of scripture can be changed ,the word then can be quickened by the Spirit if He will.

    Telling anecdotal stories can remove an obstacle here or there, but the scripture is what gets the job done.


    [QUOTE]but their refusal to do so does not change the fact that scripture is those things.[/QUOTE]
    Correct, however making them aware of the direct statements that they are subject to God's word can motivate them to see if it is so.
    I would often challenge unsaved persons to read the bible for themselves regarless if they believed it or not. i would ask them to just see what it says, whether they believes or not.


    Agreed, correct...

     
  9. Iconoclast

    Iconoclast Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2010
    Messages:
    21,242
    Likes Received:
    2,305
    Faith:
    Non Baptist Christian
    ["JonC


    I do not disagree with reformed, I understand what he posted as he posted it. If a person reads it as posted they will understand it just fine.


    No...I do not read it that way.

    Reformed does not change the wording.
    Reformed does not try and put words in my mouth as if I said them.
    When he has something to say , he does it honestly.
     
  10. Iconoclast

    Iconoclast Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2010
    Messages:
    21,242
    Likes Received:
    2,305
    Faith:
    Non Baptist Christian

    JonC posts this;


    You were answered 3 times, you saw them, they were your own posts.
    A complete falsehood once again. Can you post my own words saying any such thing?

    Then show any post where I said this in my own words...you cannot, but you post this as if it were true.

    [QUOTE]so that you may reexamine your view and hopefully correct its errors. I already told you that I stick with Scripture and not these types of formulas and methods. [/QUOTE]

    :Roflmao:Roflmao:Roflmao

    Show one, we will wait for your evidence:Cautious:Cautious:Cautious:Cautious:Cautious:Cautious
     
    #70 Iconoclast, May 14, 2020
    Last edited: May 14, 2020
  11. Reformed

    Reformed Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2012
    Messages:
    4,960
    Likes Received:
    1,694
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Jon, with respect, I do not need to explain what my words mean. I respond to posts and their authors based on their merits. I have no singular way of concurring with what someone wrote or in offering dissent and correction. I do take into consideration the person I am responding to and adopt a way of writing that will most likely convey what I have say. What I do not like is to be used as leverage by either party that are involved in a strained relationship. I already stated in post #56 that I am purposefully not posting as much as I used to. Having said that you assumed that my delay in responding to your post had a meaning to it (post #64). For the record, I have a lot going in my life at the moment and do not hang on every word posted on the Baptist Board. I will appreciate it if you do not assume things about what I have written. I offered more clarification than correction to Iconoclast in this thread, although I have no problem if either of you view my words as more corrective.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  12. Iconoclast

    Iconoclast Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2010
    Messages:
    21,242
    Likes Received:
    2,305
    Faith:
    Non Baptist Christian
    JonC,

     
  13. Iconoclast

    Iconoclast Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2010
    Messages:
    21,242
    Likes Received:
    2,305
    Faith:
    Non Baptist Christian
    In Hebrews 1:1-3 we are told of God's design in giving special revelation to mankind.
    The Lord Jesus Christ coming from the highest height came down as the full final revelation of the triune God.
    He came as the promised seed, He came as the promised Servant of The Lord .. Isa.49-53.
    We could not begin to know this without all that came before it in scripture.
    When we are being used to win the lost, the more of God's word we can offer, the more seed that can take root in those outside the Kingdom.
    It is not our clever illustrations, intellect, or philosophy, but rather the word of God, the truth of God, being sown in love that is used by the Spirit to quicken dead sinners.
    This Hebrews one passage speaks to all of redemptive history,as we see when Stephen recites an outline of all of it before being put to death by.unsaved religious persons.
    He exposed their.unbelief disguised by a religious veneer by scripturally presenting Jesus as Lord and central to world history. He demonstrated how their fathers resisted the grace of God even unto death. They were resisting obvious truth even as professed believers

    In "soul winning" there are times when an unbelievers idols must be slain to make way for King Jesus and His Kingdom to be shown for what they are,ie, preeminent.
    Paul highlights this saying man by wisdom knew not God.
    Paul learned of Jesus, we read the results in scripture.
    He encourages us to be followers of him.
     
  14. JonC

    JonC Moderator
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2001
    Messages:
    35,198
    Likes Received:
    3,791
    Faith:
    Baptist
    @Reformed,

    I meant no disrespect. I know we are not obligated to explain our posts, but I ask nonetheless. I hope you took my reply in the spirit it was intended.
    I was asking, not accusing.

    The reason I was asking is that you and I made the same points. Iconoclast accepted your point as agreement and mine as hostile. We both reject his idea that in witnessing to a person one must first establish Scripture as God's Word. So I viewed the action (his action) as personal and not related to the posts at hand (a passive aggressive insult, I guess).

    I projected this on you and that was not fair. I apologize for the mistake and ask your forgiveness.
     
    • Funny Funny x 1
  15. Reformed

    Reformed Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2012
    Messages:
    4,960
    Likes Received:
    1,694
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Jon,

    Apology accepted. Thank you.

    I think the person who can really address your concerns is Iconoclast. However, given the relationship you two "enjoy" I am not holding out hope.

    Sent from my Pixel 4 XL using Tapatalk
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Funny Funny x 1
  16. Iconoclast

    Iconoclast Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2010
    Messages:
    21,242
    Likes Received:
    2,305
    Faith:
    Non Baptist Christian
    yes Reformed
    sad but true. I have offered help many times but these offers are rejected by several means;
    1] flat out denial

    2]changing a word or phrase,them making pretend that Icon posted it the way it was re-written:Cautious

    3] after changing words like introducing superior, or necessary, then it goes to suggesting the false dichotomy..:Sick

    4] any answer is dismissed as ad hominem, even when directly quoting the person.

    5] this gets pointed out, and Icon asks for a quote using my words themselves.

    6] the quote is never produced because it was fabricated.

    7] no matter what Icon posts from the bible itself, it is ignored and an effort is made to move away from the issue.

    8] Icon tries to continue but an effort is made to portray icon as the bad guy.

    9] Any reader can read through any thread and see a pattern, an M.O.:Redface
     
    • Prayers Prayers x 1
  17. JonC

    JonC Moderator
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2001
    Messages:
    35,198
    Likes Received:
    3,791
    Faith:
    Baptist
    @Iconoclast

    Here is the problem – I have addressed specific things about your claim that I disagreed with (and a few things that I agree with). I have provided quotes of where we disagree and Scripture to support my position. I have provided the quote of your post I was addressing (I provided the quote 9 times in this thread).

    You have not engaged any of that. Instead you have chosen to engage in ad hominem and address me personally. You even rate my apology to Reformed as “funny”. You cannot truly address me personally because you do not know me personally. You are addressing your imagination of me, a fiction of how you believe that I am. That does not bother me because it says nothing of me and much about you. You are not really insulting me but addressing an enemy of your own active imagination...what someone that you imagine me to be.

    You seem to have somehow developed a "jonc" that you can "justly persecute or punish" because of imaginary crimes. That is fine. But at the same time that is not me. It is your imagination.

    Over the past couple of weeks you have complained about me rephrasing people’s comments and saying “it seems like”, or “it seems to me”, or “if I understand you correctly” rather than just quoting a post and ascribing to the poster my understanding.

    When we communicate it is best to listen and then rephrase the other persons words to reflect how you understood that person’s point. You say “it seems to me that you are saying….” (or something along those lines).

    The reason is it helps prevent making false assumptions of other people. I believe that you would have benefited greatly form this type of engagement, and had you chosen to clarify before accusing much (if not all) of our disagreements would have been dismissed easily.

    I hope that helps you going forward. If not, I hope it helps someone else.

    In Christ,

    JonC
     
    • Funny Funny x 1
  18. JonC

    JonC Moderator
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2001
    Messages:
    35,198
    Likes Received:
    3,791
    Faith:
    Baptist
    I do not know what you are talking about (and except where you address the topic of the OP, I really do not care because you do not even know me on a personal level - you are fighting creations of your own imagination).

    The issue I have with the Op is simple. Previously you said
    and you claim this is somehow Paul's method of evangelism.

    1. Your premise is false. We do not need to establish Scripture as the Word of God when witnessing to individuals.

    2. Paul did not do this.

    Please stick to the topic at hand and stop trying to address me personally. You can engage the topic, but since you do not know me any personal attacks would be against a JonC of your imagination.
     
  19. Iconoclast

    Iconoclast Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2010
    Messages:
    21,242
    Likes Received:
    2,305
    Faith:
    Non Baptist Christian
    i answered you fully 3 or 4 times,hope you read them before they vanished.
    my premise is true,100%
    it has been shown in this thread.
    you offered your opinion but have not made your point.
     
  20. JonC

    JonC Moderator
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2001
    Messages:
    35,198
    Likes Received:
    3,791
    Faith:
    Baptist
    The issue I have with the Op is simple. Previously you said
    and you claim this is somehow Paul's method of evangelism.

    1. Your premise is false. We do not need to establish Scripture as the Word of God when witnessing to individuals.

    2. Paul did not do this.

    All you have shown is that Paul quoted Scripture sometimes when preaching. But that is not your claim.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
Loading...