No, narrow your analogy - you are saving the driver was intoxicated and weaving through the neighborhood when it's actually what you thought you saw. Even if you saw it correctly, that does not mean the driver was intoxicated, he could have been having a heart attack or just a terrible driver.
Of course that possibility is true, but I documented the REALITY of the driver's ACTIONS, following him to the point where the police apprehended him and he was determined to be intoxicated. Because of the video and my willingness to testify under oath as to what I saw, he pleaded out.
What I reported to the 911 operator was that I saw a man hop the curb in a Mercedes convertible, was driving down the sidewalk, then weaving back out onto the street, barely missing parked cars and people on the road. I told the operator that I SUSPECTED he was intoxicated and she dispatched officers to the area I indicated until they caught up with us.
Whatever I thought about the condition of the driver was irrelevant before, during, and after his ACTIONS.
Pelosi and her child were there way beforehand, inside and outside the building...
Most people tend to be inside and outside buildings before, during, and after events at said buildings...
...she was hoping Trump would show up just so she could "punch him in the face". THAT is advocating violence.
Let's get this straight... You think Polosi was "advocating violence" when she expressed her anger at Trump -- in the midst of an assault on the Capitol -- for sending a mob of people to the Capitol to attack Congress (as well as specifically her, Mike Pence, AOC, and others)? It someone sends a mob to your place of business to harm you and you barely escape, then you express your anger toward the person who sent the mob, are you "advocating violence," or do you simply want consequences for the aggressor's actions?
This is exactly what is wrong with the left, you think somebody that disagrees with you has to have contempt for one and worship for the other and that his reasoning is impaired...
Because he has a long history of expressing contempt toward Polosi (and Democrats in general) and fawning admiration of Trump. He has also shown a long history of flawing thinking in his embrace of conspiracy theories that never pan out. He just keeps moving the goalposts and insisting the latest conspiracy theories are correct.
And that's not "the left," that's me. That's coming from a Christian perspective, not a "left" perspective. Discernment is a key Christian discipline, whether you practice it or not.
...but when somebody disagrees with that, that person's reasoning is also impaired.
The "somebody" is you, and your reasoning is also impaired (unless you are being dishonest).
If we go by the reasoning you have demonstrated in this thread, we can safely attribute Hillary Clinton's carelessness with classified documents in her e-mail to your dislike of her. We can also point to you as the cause of Bill Clinton's extramarital affairs. You are also responsible for Barack Obama's selection of a tan suit.
See how ridiculous that is?
