1. Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Pelosi on Iraq: This isn't a war to win...

Discussion in 'Political Debate & Discussion' started by carpro, Nov 10, 2006.

  1. The Galatian

    The Galatian Active Member

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2001
    Messages:
    9,687
    Likes Received:
    1
    (Barbarian on how competent leadership could have produced a victory in Iraq)

    The Baathist party was holding the society together. When we disbanded the army and the Baathist party, we destroyed any trace of order in Iraq. It's easier to break things than to put them back together.

    I'm pessimistic about that. Bush and his idiot neocons really messed this one up. But we can't just cut and run, now. I hope someone figures out how to end this without another disasterous bloodbath.
     
  2. hillclimber1

    hillclimber1 Active Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 10, 2006
    Messages:
    2,447
    Likes Received:
    0
    I agree that this war is now off the correct path. I believe we must increase our presence in Iraq, reaffirm our commitment, and kill as many of those nut jobs as possible. If we can continue to kill as many or more of the jihadists as they produce, they will probably not be able to come back here, and kill our citizens. And Iraqi citizens will be able to commit to a new regime based on trust that America will not desert them. But this new Congress, the Pelosi Congress will abandon Iraq.
     
  3. The Galatian

    The Galatian Active Member

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2001
    Messages:
    9,687
    Likes Received:
    1
    That's what got us in this mess in the first place. Doing the same thing, and expecting a different outcome, that's not a reasonable idea.

    Ironically, they didn't want to kill Americans until we got there. At least the Iraqis didn't. A substantial number of real terrorists moved in from other places at the beginning of the occupation, but they are largely gone now. Mostly, they are Baathists, former Iraqi soldiers, or Shiites who just want us gone.

    That was true once. But we lost the hearts and minds of most Iraqis some time ago, when we were unable to give them a safe and stable society.

    Not if history is any guide. The hardest thing for any politician to do, is to cut one's losses in a stupid and unwinnable war. My prediction is that thousands more good young troops will have to die before politicians get the backbone to solve the problem.

    BTW, I don't know how to do that. It's much, much easier to get into disasters like this, than it is to extricate one's self from them. I pray that someone figures it out.
     
  4. JamieinNH

    JamieinNH New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2005
    Messages:
    2,277
    Likes Received:
    0
    Hey,

    There is some good news here.... AT least the Right Wingers will have someone else to blame for the next two years other than Bill Clinton.

    I mean he hasn't been in office now for 6 years, and his name is still mud. Now they can target other Democrats will friendily, loving, Christian love...

    Jamie
     
  5. Terry_Herrington

    Terry_Herrington New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2002
    Messages:
    4,455
    Likes Received:
    1
    I wonder if the same people here who constantly berated us "Bush-bashers" will not themselves become "Democrat-bashers" now that the Democrats have won a majority in both Houses, or will they come up with some rational for attacking Congresswoman Pelosi or Senator Reid at every turn. Unfortunately, I fear the latter.
     
  6. carpro

    carpro Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2004
    Messages:
    25,823
    Likes Received:
    1,167
    Faith:
    Baptist

    I see.

    Cut n run is not the strategy , but you're endorsing it anyway.:rolleyes:

    Democrats have talked a lot about solutions. Now is the time to show us what they are. Timefor them to lead , not follow behind so that they can spend all their time stabbing in the back all those that do lead.

    All they talked about so far is Preemptive Surrender.

    I'm hoping I have misread their intentions but we'll all find out very quickly after Jan. 1.
     
  7. The Galatian

    The Galatian Active Member

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2001
    Messages:
    9,687
    Likes Received:
    1
    I'm trying to find where anyone in our government has suggest we surrender.

    Hysterical exaggeration isn't very useful. It makes people doubt your sanity, and it convinces no one.

    Bush's notion of eventual withdrawal, even if the insurgency is still active, is not surrender. Neither is anyone else who proposes such a thing, advocating surrender.
     
  8. LeBuick

    LeBuick New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2006
    Messages:
    11,537
    Likes Received:
    1
    I think you did a pretty good job of using the two together... :laugh: :wavey:
     
  9. LeBuick

    LeBuick New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2006
    Messages:
    11,537
    Likes Received:
    1
    Surrender to who? We are fighting against an ideology more than a person or army.

    We all know we can't leave until we can hand this mess over to someone else. Nixon called it Vietnamization and Bush is struggling to build an army, police force etc... in Iraq. I think we all agree we can't leave the area until this is done.
     
  10. hillclimber1

    hillclimber1 Active Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 10, 2006
    Messages:
    2,447
    Likes Received:
    0
    With good reason Jamie
     
  11. hillclimber1

    hillclimber1 Active Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 10, 2006
    Messages:
    2,447
    Likes Received:
    0
    That's the problem LeBuick, we don't all agree. I'm very afraid we'll cut and run. Of course it will be called something more politically palatible, but it'll still stink. I honestly believe that just the idea of troop reduction, will energize the gihadists, and fuel a firestorm of new terror recruits. We must stay the course,(have to change that slogan though) and I think the Democrats can't avoid that same conclusion. But they may
     
  12. JamieinNH

    JamieinNH New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2005
    Messages:
    2,277
    Likes Received:
    0
    Nice job cuting and pasting..

    So, in 8 years, when Bush has been out of office for 6 years, you won't mind people to continue to brate and beat up Bush for his "missed" policies and such?!? :rolleyes:

    Bring President is not small feat, and I don't care who you are. I don't knock Bush in every breathe, nor do I think he has done a perfect job. Just like Clinton, I don't think he was perfect nor was he all that bad.

    Jamie
    Walk a mile in someone shoes....
     
Loading...