You are certainly welcome to form your own opinion!
Those on the other side imply the BEV's have more fires or are a greater risk of fire. Using your criteria, those views are invalid as they must be based on evidence not sufficient to obtain a reasonable conclusion. However, if I say the risk is the same, actually based on available data which the other side ignores, why my view is to be disparaged.
Here is the point - If EV has 10% of all vehicles - and there is 2 fires of EV - that would be a 20% rate --- but when EV becomes 30% of all vehicles and there are 4 fires that would be about a 12% rate .
Thus having less then 10% is just not sufficient for statistical, info.
Thats why it is so important to know all the details....
For example - if someone took a pole and said that 51% think
Biden is doing a good job.
but then you find out that 90% of the respondents were Democrats....
Sure, less than 10% can give you a general Ideal -
but I would not bet the farm
on that small number.