• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Pizza Lady Delivers to a Church… Leaves Sobbing After What Christians Do to Her

Revmitchell

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
When Natasha arrived at a church gathering on Oct. 4 to deliver a $5.99 pizza, reported The Columbus Dispatch, the lead pastor Rev. Steve Markle brought her on stage and asked her what the biggest tip she had ever received was.

She replied that it was $10. Rev. Markle then handed her $15 from his own pocket.

“We’ve been teaching our church this last month about being generous, and so we did something special for you today,” he continued. “We took up a special offering for a tip for you.”

Without a moment to lose, the reverend then handed her the rest of his congregation’s tip — a stack of bills valued at $1,046.

Natasha not surprisingly burst into tears and hugged the reverend as the crowd cheered.

“I hope that this can help you,” Markle then said to her. “I don’t know what’s going on in your life.”

“It can help a lot,” she replied.” Thank you so much. Thank you everybody.”

A video recording of the whole incident can be viewed below:

http://rightwingnews.com/top-news/p...aves-sobbing-after-what-christians-do-to-her/
 

Carnold23

Member
I love this story! I think as Christians we all should try and do one good deed a day! As long as we are able. Then one day when we need a good deed there may be someone who will help us!
God bless. The world is good.
 

Sue-Ellen

Active Member
The story was nothing like I expected to it be. It made me smile. What a great deed. There should be more people like that. :)
 

Zaac

Well-Known Member
Nothing like doing one's good deeds in secret...
I was just thinking the same thing. I appreciate what they did. I just hate it when we, the Christians, kinda broadcast it.

If Natasha had gone back and told folks about it, that's one thing. But to do it, record it and then make it available to the public doesn't sit well with me as being the way of Christ.
 

dyanmarie25

Member
I agree. You don't really have to broadcast your good deeds to others, as though you were waiting for someone to give you a pat on the back.

Anyway, I am happy to hear about news.
 

chelle318

New Member
Things like this bring hope back to my heart. All we hear about are the Christians who are "bigots" or "intolerant" just for standing for our faith. This is such a nice story that hopefully can show others what Christianity is.
 

Emil

New Member
I like hearing stories like this, you never know when and where God will bless you. What God does for others he can do the same for you.
 

Rolfe

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
I was just thinking the same thing. I appreciate what they did. I just hate it when we, the Christians, kinda broadcast it.

If Natasha had gone back and told folks about it, that's one thing. But to do it, record it and then make it available to the public doesn't sit well with me as being the way of Christ.

The word "exploitation" arrives to mind. I wonder if anyone considered that the lady might feel humiliated being made such a spectacle.

By filming the presentation, then publishing it, I cannot get past the suspicion that it seems self-serving.

My opinion only.
 

Darrell C

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
As for me I am glad to see it.

Just how often does the Church make it into the media spotlight and it's not something negative?

It happens and the Church is exploiting? lol

Maybe so. And maybe the Church ought to exploit a little more often...


God bless.
 

Zaac

Well-Known Member
As for me I am glad to see it.

Just how often does the Church make it into the media spotlight and it's not something negative?

It happens and the Church is exploiting? lol

Maybe so. And maybe the Church ought to exploit a little more often...


God bless.
You know there's a difference between making it into the media spotlight and actively SEEKING the media spotlight. This was an "hey! look at what we did" show designed to showcase the church and what it did. That goes against Scripture. If you want to make a video or place it on a site where only church members can see it, that's one thing. I mean seriously, why is this picture

561d721ac3618814658b45cd.jpg


online unless your intent was to showcase your "generosity" to the world? How did any outside source get a hold of this picture or the video unless somebody present at the time the picture was taken wanted to broadcast it?

1“Be careful not to practice your righteousness in front of others to be seen by them. If you do, you will have no reward from your Father in heaven.


2“So when you give to the needy, do not announce it with trumpets, as the hypocrites do in the synagogues and on the streets, to be honored by others. Truly I tell you, they have received their reward in full. 3But when you give to the needy, do not let your left hand know what your right hand is doing, 4so that your giving may be in secret. Then your Father, who sees what is done in secret, will reward you.
Matthew 6:1-4

This was beyond tacky.

Not to mention, I just didn't care for the way they took her into a full sanctuary in front of the congregation so that they could do what they did and then broadcast it. It was very off-putting and simply a bad decision by the Pastor, IMO.
 

Revmitchell

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
*rolling my eyes*

You do not really think that your comment is going to change my opinion, do you?

I think that, by broadcasting their good work, they have their reward (the praise of man) here on earth.

No, people who are prone to overreacting are not likely to have their minds changed. Broadcasting is not what they were doing. That is an assumption without foundation. Their intent was not to show men and there is no reason to impose that on them.
 

Rolfe

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
No, people who are prone to overreacting are not likely to have their minds changed. Broadcasting is not what they were doing. That is an assumption without foundation. Their intent was not to show men and there is no reason to impose that on them.

So it was filmed then published by accident. Got it.
 
Top