Pope pleads for open hearts and BORDERS between US and Mexico!

[Zaac]

Except when you responded to him you did not quote the part of the article that said "The pope all but said open borders". So we understand while the Pope did not directly say open borders it was understood by more than one person that was the spirit of what he said.

In case you are not aware there is a thing called "implication". That means you have said something without using the exact words. This is what exactly what the Pope did. He did not have to say open borders to imply it.

In Biblical literature, your "implying" is the equivalent of bearing false witness. All but saying or implying isn't the same as saying. For political purposes, you and some others may glean whatever you wish from the comments of others. But it is SINFUL to say that someone has said something just because we think they have all but implied saying something if they haven't ACTUALLY said it.

And this is the second time you, as an administrator, have been rude to him.

Is this Bizarro world or something? Are the cameras on? Is TC held at a higher standard than you hold yourself? I've lost count of the times you've referred to me as a "thing".

There was NOTHING about his comments that was rude. Now on the other hand "Since when does the pope need defense?! Are you also part catholic, TC? JUst trying to see where all that righteous indignation is coming from!" THAT is rude but, par for the course, THAT wasn't addressed as rude.

Help us Jesus! Politics seems to blind folks to the truth.

 

[TCassidy]

Except when you responded to him you did not quote the part of the article that said "The pope all but said open borders".

Correct. I saw no reason to repeat the title of the thread which was, well, AT THE TOP OF THE THREAD! LOL!

 

[TCassidy]

So we understand while the Pope did not directly say open borders it was understood by more than one person

So, if more than one person understands you to be a 5 point calvinist that means you are a 5 point calvinist?

"Implied?" Are you familiar with the concept of "best evidence?"

 

[Revmitchell]

So, if more than one person understands you to be a 5 point calvinist that means you are a 5 point calvinist?

"Implied?" Are you familiar with the concept of "best evidence?"

You are just being silly.

 

[Revmitchell]

Correct. I saw no reason to repeat the title of the thread which was, well, AT THE TOP OF THE THREAD! LOL!

I did not say anything about repeating the title to the thread.

 

[TCassidy]

You are just being silly.

Well, that settles it! Your logical, well reasoned, and penetrating argument was devastatingly effective!

 

[TCassidy]

I did not say anything about repeating the title to the thread.

The title of the thread contained the "almost said" statement under discussion.