Found this online....
http://www.graceonlinelibrary.org/e...erican-postmillennialism-by-kim-riddlebarger/
http://www.graceonlinelibrary.org/e...erican-postmillennialism-by-kim-riddlebarger/
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
While Riddlebarger in his book A Case for Amillennialism (2003 Baker/IVP) spends most of his ink on trying to discredit dispensationalism, he shows himself to be no friend of postmillennialism and preterism, for some examples see pg 94-99.
The main feature of the above mentioned book, as I suggest is that instead of making a case for one thing (amillennialism), he spends an enormous amount of time discrediting another thing (dispensationalism). Question: who is a better car salesman, the salesman who talkes about the good qualities of the car he is selling or the salesman who talkes about the negatives of the car he isn't selling?
here is some of his sermons on amill
http://www.sermonaudio.com/search.a...ction=sermonsspeaker&keyword=Kim^Riddlebarger
Ecclesiologically speaking, there's basically no difference between post and a- mil. The only difference is the "Post Millennial Hope", the victory of the Church in the world. Now this has deeper implications, such as whether the return of Christ is imminent or not. In the Post Mill schema, the consummation cannot be imminent given the current predominance of paganism and atheism in the world. However, in the amil view, the Church has no victory to expect, and so the Lord could return at any time.