Pot Planning to Call Kettle Black

[rbell]

The NAACP doesn't condemn the New Black Panther Party...because they don't disagree with them. Easy enough.

 

[Eric B]

Considering the stuff the NBPP teaches, that's quite a charge.
Now, you can infer that from their lack of a strong condemnation of the NBPP, but you seem to be doing the reverse. That creates a cyclical argument. So in order to do that, you need to show where they do agree with all of that, and that means the whole thing of overthrowing or killing whites; not just accusing whites of racism.

 

[Dragoon68]

Considering the stuff the NBPP teaches, that's quite a charge.
Now, you can infer that from their lack of a strong condemnation of the NBPP, but you seem to be doing the reverse. That creates a cyclical argument. So in order to do that, you need to show where they do agree with all of that, and that means the whole thing of overthrowing or killing whites; not just accusing whites of racism.

The "straight line argument" is that if the NAACP is so concerned about the alleged "racism" of the Tea Party that it feels compelled to rebuke the Tea Party over it, then it has no excuse for not roundly condemning the New Black Panther Party in all that it stands for.