And why wouldn't we want to do so if we are led of the Spirit?
That's the Apostle Paul's argument.
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
And why wouldn't we want to do so if we are led of the Spirit?
Yes, but... "I delight in the law of God after the inward man: But I see another law in my members, warring against the law of my mind, and bringing me into captivity to the law of sin which is in my members. O wretched man that I am! who shall deliver me from the body of this death?" (Romans 7:22-24)Try to live by (under) God's Law and you will be crushed into dust. Live by (under) His grace and you will be finally free to obey.
I agree. You're refuting an argument I have not made. There was no mention of trying to keep the law. May I suggest you go back and carefully read the OP?Christ fulfilled the Covenant of Works on your behalf. "In Him" we are as righteous as if we had. On our own, we are incapable of law-obedience.
I'm not exactly clear on what you believe I am unsure of...If biblical history has not made that abundantly clear to you, then Christ's Sermon on the Mount should have.
Sheep need not be told to stay out of the hog wallow They stay in the green pastures and drink only pure water..
Antinomianism is seen through one's attitude towards God's commands, not whether they are capable of keeping those commands.
As has already been said, Christ has fulfilled the requirements of the Law for us. That does not mean we are free to sin willfully. Our attitude towards John 14:15 reveals much about our profession. We will never keep God's commands perfectly this side of glory. To suggest otherwise is to mix works with grace - .
It is a good reminder for us to understand the true nature of God's grace and how it frees us from the Law. It is also a good reminder to live our lives in a manner pleasing to the Lord.
Sheep are guided constantly or else chaos.
Yes, but... "I delight in the law of God after the inward man: But I see another law in my members, warring against the law of my mind, and bringing me into captivity to the law of sin which is in my members. O wretched man that I am! who shall deliver me from the body of this death?" (Romans 7:22-24)
John 10
27 My sheep hear my voice, and I know them, and they follow me:
28 And I give unto them eternal life; and they shall never perish, neither shall any man pluck them out of my hand.
29 My Father, which gave them me, is greater than all; and no man is able to pluck them out of my Father's hand.
30 I and my Father are one.
We can delight in the law of God while at the same time being unable to keep it while still in this earthly body.
We do, some think they do and don't but depend on self in an attempt to please the shepherd.Sheep the hear and obey -- and follow... are following the Word of God instead of declaring that it does not apply to them. I think we all see that point.
I agree. I believe that is exactly what Paul is teaching in Romans 7. My thought, or rather introspective question is, do I (we) entertain some transgressions of the law (the Word of God - Psalms 19:7 - not the Mosaic Law) and allow them to remain with the assumption that God's grace is sufficient to cleanse us. That would make us "practicing antinomians" as I understand antinomianism philosophy.We can delight in the law of God while at the same time being unable to keep it while still in this earthly body.
Every believer should relate with Pastor Bob on this, 'the bold sin' has always been a very real and ever present danger for all the saints, OT and NT:
13 Keep back thy servant also from presumptuous sins; Let them not have dominion over me: Then shall I be upright, And I shall be clear from great transgression. Ps 19
13 For ye, brethren, were called for freedom; only use not your freedom for an occasion to the flesh, but through love be servants one to another. Gal 5
This is probably the biggest problem I have with the Calvinist Lord Salvation theology, they don't acknowledge how normal and frequent these sins are in the everyday life of Christians. Their doctrine of 'Perseverance' (in lieu of 'Preservation') really means that if one has truly savingly sincerely genuinely believed they will grow to be above these 'intentional sins'. If they don't, they're 'antichrists'.
WeAnd why wouldn't we want to do so if we are led of the Spirit?
Agreeing with you.
Sheep the hear and obey -- and follow... are following the Word of God instead of declaring that it does not apply to them.
I think we all see that point.
We do, some think they do and don't but depend on self
Hebrews 8:13 In that he saith, A new covenant, he hath made the first old. Now that which decayeth and waxeth old is ready to vanish away.Hebrews 4: "There remains therefore a Sabbath rest for the people of God"
.
Hebrews 8:13 In that he saith, A new covenant, he hath made the first old. Now that which decayeth and waxeth old is ready to vanish away.
You are confusedThe first covenant is of the form "obey and Live" -- Adam and Eve failed that one.
The New Covenant writes "the LAW of God on the heart and mind" Jer 31:31-33... perhaps you have heard of it.
Rom 3:19-20 -- the world STILL lost under that OLD Covenant. And the individual only saved if they accept the NEW Covenant that we see in the OLD Testament in Jeremiah 31:31-33 unchanged in the NT according to Hebrews 8:6-12
I agree. I believe that is exactly what Paul is teaching in Romans 7. My thought, or rather introspective question is, do I (we) entertain some transgressions of the law (the Word of God - Psalms 19:7 - not the Mosaic Law) and allow them to remain with the assumption that God's grace is sufficient to cleanse us. That would make us "practicing antinomians" as I understand antinomianism philosophy.
Yes, but... "I delight in the law of God after the inward man: But I see another law in my members, warring against the law of my mind, and bringing me into captivity to the law of sin which is in my members. O wretched man that I am! who shall deliver me from the body of this death?" (Romans 7:22-24)
I'm not exactly clear on what you believe I am unsure of...
I understand the text. It isn't talking about the Ten Commandments, but the 'old covenant', made between God and Israel in Exodus 19, with Moses as the mediator between them. The Ten Commandments are never, in all of scripture [KJB], called the 'old covenant'. It is a matter of 'ministration', or 'administration' [2 Corinthians 3 KJB], in how they were to be fulfilled [Romans 2:7, 8:4, 13:8; Galatians 2:6 [John 14:15; Exodus 20:6; James 4:12 KJB], carried out, lived, etc. The difference of location, outward stones, or the inward fleshy tables [notice this word please] of the heart/mind. The brain has two hemispheres, thus two tables.Hebrews 8:13 In that he saith, A new covenant, he hath made the first old. Now that which decayeth and waxeth old is ready to vanish away.
Legalist don't understand either of these passages.