Originally posted by Eric B:
LD: Scripture please.
Please show this concept of dual fulfillment from scripture.
I contend it dosen't exist, and is only manifest through the need to reconcile scripture with a previously held futurist bias.
EB:How about all the scriptures in both Daniel and Revelation where we see the Gentile kings/powers (the beast, etc) fighting against Christ and being destroyed; and not just Israel?
How does the above prove "dual fulfillment"?
You're only suggesting "unfulfillment" here.
Perhaps you could share your definition of "dual fulfilment".
It is so obvious that that has not been completely fulfilled.
First of all, define "completely" Tell me how they were already "Partially fulfilled".
What historic events brought "partial fulfillment", how was it accomplished, and how is it to be applied?
Secondly, and oddly enough more importantly, the assertion that "it's obvious" shows the futurist bias you are
obviously approaching the text with.
The ridiculous "spiritual" interpretations of this fulfillment ("Christ crushes the nations in that they all pass away after a time"; "We reign over them in that they are 'needy subjects' being lost without Christ"--as if these things weren't true before this "parousia") completely does away with the meaning of words,
Paul told the 1st century Thessalonians that their present persecution would come to an end via the parousia of Christ in which they're 1st century persecuters would receive judgement:
2 Thess. 1:5-10 NKJ
5 which is manifest evidence of the righteous judgment of God, that you may be counted worthy of the kingdom of God, for which you also suffer; 6 since it is a righteous thing with God to
repay with tribulation those who trouble you, 7 and to [/b]give you who are troubled rest[/b] with us
when the Lord Jesus is revealed from heaven with His mighty angels, 8 in flaming fire taking vengeance on those who do not know God, and on those who do not obey the gospel of our Lord Jesus Christ. 9 These shall be punished with everlasting destruction from the presence of the Lord and from the glory of His power, 10 when He comes, in that Day, to be glorified in His saints and to be admired among all those who believe, F1 because our testimony among you was believed.
Care to explain to me the "partial fulfillment" of this?
Has the 1st century Thessalonian congragation received "rest form their persecution" yet?
remember, Paul said their rest would come via the parousia of Christ
Have their 1st century persecutors been repayed with tribulation [via the parousia] yet?
If not, please describe this current "future to them tribulation" they will one day experience that Paul was referring to here.
does away with our hope (there is nothing left to look forward to in our lifetimes, and we don't even now what is after we die
No such conclusion can be forced upon the preterist view.
The preterist view testifies the opposite.
Our Hope is not "done away with" rather it is fulfilled. You don't hope for what you already have. My Hope lies in Jesus Christ an in my absolute assurance that when I shed this earthly tent [my mortal body], I have a house in heaven made without hands [the Body that God Gives me] in which and WHERE whcih I will reside for eternity. Demonstrating tthat Preterists know exactly what is after we die. Humans are either immediatly clothed in our resurrection bodies that God gives us [1Corr 15:38] and ushered into the presence of God where we shall forever dwell, or they are immediately cast into the lake of fire, suffering in their sin, forever.
LD:Should we be expecting another virgin birth?
another crusifixion?
Where does "double fulfillment" start and stop?
how does the Christian discern which prophesies have dual fulfillment, and what abot triple fulfillment? what's to stop that??
Was the cross merely a "shadow" of some future greater sacrifice for sin?
EB:Obviously; something that is completely fulfilled does not need any "greater"
again with the preconceptive "Obviously"......
Who gets to say what's been completely fulfilled and what hasn't?
Majority Rule?
(Here's a hint... search scripture to see who was given the authority to proclaim prophetic fulfillment)
Christ's work was said to be complete, and when He returns, it will be "without sin unto salvation" --(i.e the third aspect of salvation--deliverance from this world of suffering and death).
Please show this "third aspect of salvation" concept from scripture, with a timeline if you could.
And there is some multiple fulfillment (beyond double) in there too. Christ was the antitypical Passover lamb. But the Passover ritual itself had as its prototype the actual passing over of the Israelites by the angel of death in Egypt.
I believe your ideas of “multiple fulfillments are rooted in O.T. TYPES (i.e. foreshadowings of Messiah). The only problem is, the O.T. foreshadowing finds its final fulfillment in the Messianic generation and does not continue to repeat over and over and over again (for Jesus Christ is no "shadow," but is the OBJECT itself - Col 1:17).
The O.T. prophets did not believe the Messianic advent itself would serve as a TYPE for greater fulfillments beyond it. As I asked, Is calvary a mere TYPE for some greater redemption in our future from sin? Of course not. The O.T. things foreshadowed N.T. COMPLETIONS. The N.T. things do NOT in turn forshadow some future priesthood, sacrifice for sin, etc. The shadows provided by the O.T. religion and history point to the real object of Christ and the heavenly covenant (Col 1:17; Heb 8:1-5; Heb 9:23-24).
The "hermenutic" that the apostles had was a "typological" hermenutic. Those O.T. historical events acted as a background that set the Messianic themes (or "TYPES" that Israel would then look for in a coming Messiah. This is basic foreshadowing at work here. The jews saw their national history as FORESHADOWING the life and themes of their future Messiah -- but they could not piece it all together before he came. They had inklings and hunches and nailed down some of the pieces, but much of the details were not clear until it unfolded.
Jesus said to the rabbis, "you search the scriptures because in them you think you have life, yet the scriptures TESTIFY OF ME." This is Jesus pointing them to the TYPOLOGICAL "messianic hermeneutic." We should note, however, that the scriptures only testify of Christ if one reads them with the MESSIANIC or "CHRIST" HERMENUTIC (i.e., this way of reading the O.T. in order to find clues about Israel's Messiah). Furthermore, surely there were competing "messianic hermeneutics" at work in the 1st century. While the apostles recognized that the themes of Israel's history foreshadowed Jesus Christ and his life and death and resurrection, obviously not all jews agreed with the apostles' hermeneutic and many doubted it and openly disputed the apostles' reading of scripture.
So, concerning Israel's historic events and how the apostles interpreted them, Paul says to his endtime contemporaries: "these things happened to them FOR EXAMPLES, AND WERE WRITTEN FOR OUR INSTRUCTION UPON WHOM THE ENDS OF THE AGES HAVE COME!" So here Paul believes the O.T. story he mentions in 1 Cor 10:1-10 was really written down as a foreshadowing of the Messianic generation. We see this exact hermenutical principle also mentioned in 1 Peter 1:10-12, which also applies the O.T. prophetic writings as finding their FULLEST completion in Christ's generation!
Finally, to prove that the O.T. things don't just repeat over and over and over again, Jesus said that "ALL THINGS WRITTEN WOULD BE FULFILLED" by the time of the Roman Jewish war (Luke 21:20-22). That statement is so absolute. And, if anyone should wonder what the "ALL THINGS WRITTEN" applies to, they only need look to Luke 24:44 to see that it means all the Law, Psalms, and Prophets -- The Old Testament canon! After Jesus is resurrected he tells his disciples that all things written about himself in the O.T. canon must be fulfilled! (Luke 24:44) -- and Luke 21:20-22 tells us WHEN the terminus arrived (Israel's Great Tribulation of 67-70AD).
So no, your logic does not prove your point. Clearly there are things that are not fulfilled, and can only be forced into fulfillment by stretching the meanings of things to limit them to the past only.[/quote]
You still need to show how you "include" the past, since right now it appears you are "excluding" them from any application.
No scripture may be interprated in such a way as to remove application to those who first received it.
To prove your argument about "partial, dual, multiple fulfillment", of any NT or OT eschatological passage, you must first demonstrate 1st century application.
You have yet to do so, but I'm all ears.
If it's true that the Church does eventually conquer the earth, then right there, that would be some future fulfillment.
Rather, it will be future "application" of the fulfilled reality.
In fact, God would be doing some work that He was not doing during all those centuries when the true Church was small.
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />
Not Doing?
Name one nation that still exists from the time the Church was born.
They rise and fall, the Church remains.
They all are subject to the never ending nation kingdom of the Church. Time is no object.
But still, even the church "spreading" does not mean divine "dominion". That's the mistake people make. They see the organization spreading, and Christian language and concepts spreading, and assume that they are actually spreading God's dominion. Many Christians profess the faith but are not really saved. Many groups apostasize.
So we are not subduing kingdoms.</font>[/QUOTE]Kingdoms rise and fall, the Church remains.
Ironically, as much as preterists criticize people for wanting a physical kingdom "of this world", it is they who are claiming some sort of physical kingdom on the earth, only pasting the label "spiritual" on it by saying that one is spiritually born into it.
You don't believe you are born spiritually into the Kingdom of Christ on earth?
How does one enter into it then?
Bt while God started it throuhg us, He will return to finish it.
What does that mean?
I point you back to the Thessalonains who were awaiting rest from their persecution that would arrive via the parousia.
Did God proviode them the rest He promised or are they still being persecutied?
Remember, the Kingdom was prophesied by Jesus as like a mustard seed. It starts small, and then grows. And it is God who does the work; not us.
Rather, it is God who does the work "through us".
LD:
It "looks like" it's getting worse?
That sounds convincing.
Can you prove it?
Give me an example of a time in our past when and how the Church was "Better off" than it is today and explain your findings in a way that they can be cross checked by our readers.
Was it better off Last year?
10 years ago?
50 years ago?
100?
500?
1000?
2000?
Well, what do you judge "better off" by? Because of the
numbers of professing Christians in the world? Because of all the organizations we have (and make money and gain some power through)? Because of our relative peace and prosperity in the West? Once again, you make the same mistake of the Church of the past, and of all others who look to establish a physical kingdom. It can be argued that it was best off in the first 3 centuries, when persecution drove them together as a body, and then they really grew.[/quote]
You seem to be arguing that sanctification has no temporal effect on the Christian.
I would argue that temporal effects are an inescapable result of sanctification.
That is what the mustard seed is about.
It seems Satan (who's obviously still around) got wise and changed his tactic.
And yet again you go with the presumptive "obviously".
How do you know satan is "still around"?
Are you asserting that Human beings are incapable of sinning without Satanic influence?
Where does the Bible teach that?
And so what if he is?
He is powerless to keep anyone from salvation.
Satan is a defeated foe, regardless of his geographic location.
Instead of persecution; give the church power and prestige.
It is our divine right as priests and kings of the Holy nation of God.
Now she becomes corrupt, and increasingly fragmented; yet still rationalizing it all by saying she is the final "kingdom".
When Human beings fail to act upon, or live up to the obligation of that divine authority, it does not mean the authority does not exist.
LD:As I pointed out, Jesus Christ is LITERALLY the FIRST RESURRECTION.
There was none before Him, He was LITERALLY the FIRST.
You apparantly do not hold a literal interpratation of the First resurrection.
Unbiased minds can see that my previous comment on it answers all objections you have raised.
EB:
Yes, He was the first resurretion, but He was also the firstFRUITS; meaning the first of the crop; the first one in a series of similar resurrections. You seem to be trying to make this mean "HE is the only one resurrectioed in the first resurrection,
As I said before, The tribulation saints of Revelation 6:9-11 were granted the realization of their co-inheritance with Christ--this realization of their hope is depicted in Revelation 20:4-6. St. John shows us the tribulation saints co-raised and co-enthroned with Jesus, realizing the full hope of St. Paul's teaching on the saints' reign and resurrection in the reign and resurrection of Jesus.
Revelation 20:4-6 is a narrative depiction of the saints' realization of the glorious promise Paul held out for them in his teachings--the saints are depicted as having attained the goal for which they all strove. As Paul taught, their resurrection and reign was "in Christ," and their sufferings and martyrdoms were honored by God with the reward of partaking in Christ's own resurrection, enthronement, and reign. They realized the promise of Paul's teaching that the saints were truly to take part in the first resurrection, the resurrection of Jesus Christ. Truly, on these the second death has no power
by being born again, we are spiritually 'joined' to that resurrection without ever being resurrected ourselves. "; But one thing preterists have never answered is what is this second resurrection, then? If this first resurrection is only a symbol of "spiritual life"; then are the wicked dead given spiritual life at the judgment, then? What individual is the "literal" second resurrection, then? Preterism obviously has not thought these methods of interpretation through.
Ya just had to get one last presumptuous "obviously" in there didn't you?
Show me this "2nd resurrection" from scripture and I'll respond to your querry.