Thinkingstuff said:Just curious. I wondered about this as well. Lets look at it from a different point of view. Which disciples died before his transfiguration?
Thank You!! At least I know somebody is following my argument.:thumbs:
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Thinkingstuff said:Just curious. I wondered about this as well. Lets look at it from a different point of view. Which disciples died before his transfiguration?
None. What am I missing?Thinkingstuff said:Just curious. I wondered about this as well. Lets look at it from a different point of view. Which disciples died before his transfiguration?
quote=skypair]Originally Posted by Grasshopper
So in hindsight you say the inspired Paul was wrong.
Hey, and before him, 7 disciples who ate fish with the risen Jesus were wrong as well!! They were the ones who started the "rumor" that "John should not die!"
You are merely taking the transfiguration out of view and putting the kingdom of Christ on earth in it's place. But the scripture contradicts your interpretation. It goes on immediately to speak of 3 disciples witnessing an event like "the Son of man coming in His glory." In fact, I've never heard anyone even claim that Jesus was speaking of an event 40 years away.
Now don't get disgusted, Gh. Just because you've never heard it and you didn't invent it doesn't make it wrong. It just means you are not "feeling" my end of the "elephant."
Nah -- too non-specific.
The context is the prophecies of the Book, meaning everything written prior. This statement serves as bookends to the entire book:
Amy.G said:None. What am I missing?
You are merely taking the transfiguration out of view and putting the kingdom of Christ on earth in it's place. But the scripture contradicts your interpretation. It goes on immediately to speak of 3 disciples witnessing an event like "the Son of man coming in His glory." In fact, I've never heard anyone even claim that Jesus was speaking of an event 40 years away.
None. The point was not that any would die before witnessing the kingdom in glory (which, even when Grasshopper's alleged kingdom came, wasn't in glory). The point was that, though all would be alive, only "some" (P, J, & J)would see the transfiguration.Thinkingstuff said:Which disciples died before his transfiguration?
skypair said:The point was that, though all would be alive, only "some" (P, J, & J)would see the transfiguration.
No, the point was only some would not taste death. You completely twisted the meaning.
Grasshopper said::laugh: :laugh: :laugh: Or maybe it was YOU twisted it. Either way, you've "cooked your goose" and I've "cooked" mine.No, the point was only some would not taste death. You completely twisted the meaning.
skypair
skypair said:Grasshopper said::laugh: :laugh: :laugh: Or maybe it was YOU twisted it. Either way, you've "cooked your goose" and I've "cooked" mine.
skypair
The Bible says:
Mat 16:28 Truly I say to you, There are some standing here who shall not taste of death until they see the Son of Man coming in His kingdom.
Skypair says:
Mat 16:28 Truly I say to you, There are some standing here who shall see the Son of Man coming in His kingdom.
Who are we to believe?
Grasshopper said:skypair said:The Bible says:
Mat 16:28 Truly I say to you, There are some standing here who shall not taste of death until they see the Son of Man coming in His kingdom.
Skypair says:
Mat 16:28 Truly I say to you, There are some standing here who shall see the Son of Man coming in His kingdom.
Who are we to believe?