Originally posted by Joseph_Botwinick:
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by Lorelei:
My point being, if the five purposes are NT based, as you say they are, then I don't need the book anyway, because I already have the NT. Too many people and churches are following men's teachings, not Gods. If pastors aren't already fulfilling their purpose according to the NT, what are they doing behind the pulpit?
~Lorelei
I totally agree. I think this also begs the question that if the 5 purposes are based on the NT, and our pastors are preaching the Word of God with God's calling and annointing of the Holy Spirit, shouldn't we have figured this out a long time ago? Why isn't God's word good enough anymore?
Joseph Botwinick </font>[/QUOTE]"If pastors aren't already fulfilling their purpose according to the NT, what are they doing behind the pulpit?" Being relatively ineffective.
"I think this also begs the question that if the 5 purposes are based on the NT, and our pastors are preaching the Word of God with God's calling and anointing of the Holy Spirit, shouldn't we have figured this out a long time ago?" Yes, and that was done, then it fossilized.
The message of the NT is timeless, but just as Jesus and Paul did, that message must be presented in an optimal way that reaches the intended audience in cultural forms that are familiar to it. Taking a timeless message and wrapping it up in a package of, say, seating designed in the 1500s, a Bible translation written in language current in the 1600s, in a building designed to look like it was built in the 1700s, using preaching methods that were cutting-edge in the 1800s, along with songs from the 1700s and 1800s set to music that was quick and lively in the 1800s accompanied by an instrument popular in the 1300s, isn't conducive to that message being well received by postmoderns of the 2000s. The message is the point, but the presentation matters.
Jesus adapted the presentation of His message to His listeners. Paul adapted His preaching to the situation he faced according to the people he was with. Missionaries are trained to understand the culture and people where they are stationed and then accommodate their methods to reach them. This is what Warren's book teaches. It's what the average preacher today in evangelical or fundamentalist circles does not do. It's what every good, effective missionary does.
I understand the KJV (which is written at the college level). I prefer classic acappella hymn singing in four-part harmony. I kind of like pews. I love old-fashioned church architecture. I'm used to dressing up for church. I hate seeing people wear shorts to church. I'm bored by contemporary choruses and annoyed when they're repeated six times in a row. I'm usually a little irritated by a band accompanying the choruses. I also understand theological jargon like justification and propitiation. I recognize when masculine pronouns are being used inclusively as generic. However,
I'm not somebody who's supposed to be being reached.
What are some of the earth-shattering, demonically inspired, horrifying suggestions in
The Purpose Driven Church? Reserving the best parking spots for first-time visitors. Having parking attendants. Greeters often the age and family status of the folks you hope to attract to the church. Minimizing down time. Using music most people actually relate to (how many people look for organ music on their radios when setting their station-memory)? Using a Bible ordinary people can understand. Green plants inside. Good lighting. A comfortable temperature. Pew Bibles, so when giving a Scripture reference, to avoid embarrassing visitors who couldn't find Malachi or Obadiah, especially not quickly, even if you offered them a hundred bucks, guests can be told not only book, chapter and verse, but page number. Good child care during the service. Coffee and doughnuts after the service. Encouraging every member to have a ministry. Meeting once a week in small groups for prayer and Bible study. Clean bathrooms. Prominent signs for exits, lavatories, and so on. Getting rid of words like narthex and anthem in favor of entrance and song. Having multiple services to make it more convenient for visitors to come. If a bunch of people like doing things the old way, have a service like that for them. Keeping the lawn outside neat and nice, and the inside clean and orderly. Neither swooping down on visitors like vultures, making them seek a quick escape, nor ignoring them so they think the church is cold, and one they never want to come back to. Obviously, all these suggestions are just awful, antichristian nonsense! Right?
I'm convinced that most of the people attacking the PD principles have never even
read the book. Thus they know not whereof they speak. And they wish to stay with methods and ways of doing things they think date back to the apostles but were actually controversial innovations widely attacked as strange and non-traditional when they were introduced 150-200 years ago by seeker-friendly churches.
[ September 18, 2003, 12:45 AM: Message edited by: Taufgesinnter ]