Prophetic or just Pretentious?

[righteousdude2]

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/12/26/us/politics/obama-third-term-donald-trump.html?_r=0

Well, my, my, my ... Mr. Obama believes that had it been himself running against Mr. Trump, "in his vision" he would have won against the Donald.

So what do you think? Could Obama really have continued his "hope and change" message for another four years had he, not Hillary been the DNC candidate against Trump?

 

[HankD]

He wouldn't have won.

BUT, I think we will be hearing from him for many many years to come.

The liberal progressive left-handed press will give him the bully pulpit ANYTIME he wants it and especially when he wants a Trump pile-on.

Also governor Huckabee asks this question of Obama: What kind of message does this send to Hillary?
Hey Hillary, you lost but I would have won!

HankD

 

[righteousdude2]

He wouldn't have won.

BUT, I think we will be hearing from him for many many years to come.

The liberal progressive left-handed press will give him the bully pulpit ANYTIME he wants it and especially when he wants a Trump pile-on.

Also governor Huckabee asks this question of Obama: What kind of message does this send to Hillary?
Hey Hillary, you lost but I would have won!

HankD

Me thinks you're right about hearing from the "great I was!" He believes he was sent by allah, and his Muslim arrogance will keep his mouth running for at lesst four more years.

I can't imagine what America will be without the "hope" he instilled throughout the nation, and the change he forced down our throats through never ending Executive Orders.

 

[Baptist Believer]

If the choice was simply between Obama and Trump, Obama would be the easy choice.

If the choice was between Obama and Clinton, Obama would still be the easy choice.

If the choice was between Obama and a solid moderate Republican leader, the unknown Republican leader would be the easy choice.

 

[HankD]

If the choice was simply between Obama and Trump, Obama would be the easy choice.

If the choice was between Obama and Clinton, Obama would still be the easy choice.

If the choice was between Obama and a solid moderate Republican leader, the unknown Republican leader would be the easy choice.

306 to 232 - looks like Trump was the easy choice.

HankD

 

[Baptist Believer]

306 to 232 - looks like Trump was the easy choice.

Since this was about personal opinions, not election results, I don't understand the point of your post except to point out that my convictions are different than the electoral college.

Big deal.

 

[Benjamin]

Sour grapes...and Trump would have punked Obama ...badly.

 

[HankD]

Since this was about personal opinions, not election results, I don't understand the point of your post except to point out that my convictions are different than the electoral college.

Big deal.

Don't take it personally brother.
My post is my personal opinion in response to your personal opinion in response to the O/P.



HankD

 

[carpro]

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/12/26/us/politics/obama-third-term-donald-trump.html?_r=0

Well, my, my, my ... Mr. Obama believes that had it been himself running against Mr. Trump, "in his vision" he would have won against the Donald.

So what do you think? Could Obama really have continued his "hope and change" message for another four years had he, not Hillary been the DNC candidate against Trump?

Yep. He would have won.

He's delusional about a lot of things , but not this one.

It would have been bad news for democrats, but they stiil don't get it.

 

[carpro]

If the choice was simply between Obama and Trump, Obama would be the easy choice.

If the choice was between Obama and Clinton, Obama would still be the easy choice.

If the choice was between Obama and a solid moderate Republican leader, the unknown Republican leader would be the easy choice.

Nope. Obama beats liberal lite every time.

 

[InTheLight]

If the 2016 election were between Trump and Obama, I think Trump would have won. After 8 years of just about any president the people want change. The most recent exception was George Bush Sr. winning after two terms of Reagan, but he had the benefit of a roaring economy and the restoration of American pride on his side. There was no reason for change.

Otherwise, Kennedy beat Nixon after 8 years of Eisenhower, Carter beat Ford after 8 years of Nixon/Ford, Clinton beat Bush after 12 years Reagan/Bush, Bush beat Gore after 8 years of Clinton, Obama beat McCain after 8 years of George W. Bush. So, yeah, I think Trump would have beaten Obama.

 

[Revmitchell]

People want change because they are tired of failure. They are tired of the poor direction of the country. They are tired of Obama and his progressive arrogant attitude. Nothing more nothing less.

 

[Yeshua1]

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/12/26/us/politics/obama-third-term-donald-trump.html?_r=0

Well, my, my, my ... Mr. Obama believes that had it been himself running against Mr. Trump, "in his vision" he would have won against the Donald.

So what do you think? Could Obama really have continued his "hope and change" message for another four years had he, not Hillary been the DNC candidate against Trump?

Well, he did predict a clinton landside!

 

[HankD]

Obamacare would have been his Achilles heal.
Of course he would have said that he would fix it!

But everyone would remember... If you like your plan... If you like your doctor

HankD