There are many things I believe and keep them to myself
Lol, I dare say that's pretty much the norm with most of us Charlie.
Last edited:
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
There are many things I believe and keep them to myself
I assume Satan was involved.
"Father, forgive them, for they know not what they do" I don't think is referring to Satan.
9 | I pray for them: I pray not for the world, but for those whom thou hast given me; for they are thine: |
Why don't you take that up with @JonC. He's the one claiming that the atonement is about Jesus suffering the wrath of Satan. I was saying that Satan may have been involved in Christ's death but the work of atonement is not about appeasing or submitting to Satan.Wow. 'Assuming' Genesis 3:15 to be the 'germ of all prophecy' (A.W. Pink), that's quite a profound statement on your part Dave.
It seems that people have assumed that since the animals didn’t volunteer themselves that Jesus has not volunteered Himself.Now here is a common problem and it explains I think why the ECF's had some weird views, as well as our friends, the Socinians, and even some of the clumsy modern evangelicals of today.
"Any notion of penal substitution in which three independent actors play play a role - the guilty party, the punitive judge and the innocent victim - is to be repudiated with the utmost vehemence. It would not only be unjust in itself but would also reflect a defective Christology. For Christ is not an independent third person, but the eternal Son of the Father, who is one with the Father in his essential being." Stott, again.
In other words, there are some common ways of expressing penal substitution that are misplaced at best as well as understandings of the Godhead and the Trinity which PSA depends on. And of course there are deliberate heresies modern as well as ancient.
He's the one claiming that the atonement is about Jesus suffering the wrath of Satan.
Well, he was praying for the humans around him participating in his crucifixion. In addition to that it is said in scripture that he must be delivered into the hands of wicked men. Those statements, in my opinion don't help the theory that the purpose of this was to be punished by Satan, as a trick, or whatever the reason the ECF's thought.He was praying for His own (only), NOT for the devil, that was ignorantly 'wrapped up' in the heat of the moment
I understand the argument
Absolutely. Jesus volunteered himself and declared it as his mission. He did things to provoke the rulers to act in this way. I am Calvinist enough to believe that evil men, while not made evil by God, at some point can be used by God to do evil things according to His plan. I guess that could even apply to Satan. All I know is that if Jon and Ky want to believe the atonement was about Jesus suffering under Satan and have that be the main thrust of the atonement then I say "baloney". What Jesus suffered was what we would have been destined for under the hand of God. Maybe not in exactly the same way because we are only men and not also divine, but the principle is there.It seems that people have assumed that since the animals didn’t volunteer themselves that Jesus has not volunteered Himself.
But Jesus said that no man takes His life from Him. He laid it down Himself.
Why would you say that? Are you trying to say that I don't believe that the scribes and pharisees were in the camp and working under or with Satan? The question is did the atoning work of Christ, at the level of what it actually did for us as humans, have to do with our own offenses against God and the earned and necessary judgement from that holy God - or were we neutral bystanders and Jesus mission was to give some satisfaction to Satan.Do you understand how the Serpent took form in this temporal realm?
Or do you just refuse to believe it?
Jon and Ky want to believe the atonement was about Jesus suffering under Satan and have that be the main thrust of the atonement then I say "baloney".
It may not be what is intended or believed, but the idea that somehow Satan has any authority to judge men is flawed. Satan is the accuser and not the judge. Satan will not be in charge of Hell. Hell is a place of torment that was prepared for the devil and his angels and not intended for mankind. But it will be shared with men who have followed the devil. Man is, in creation, in the image of God. We begin our lives by the creative act of God. And yet sinful men are told that they are of their father the devil. This is clearly not in a physical sense. But as Adam followed Satan in the garden, mankind follows the wickedness of Satan still. Authority of Satan? Only when authority is relinquished to him.Absolutely. Jesus volunteered himself and declared it as his mission. He did things to provoke the rulers to act in this way. I am Calvinist enough to believe that evil men, while not made evil by God, at some point can be used by God to do evil things according to His plan. I guess that could even apply to Satan. All I know is that if Jon and Ky want to believe the atonement was about Jesus suffering under Satan and have that be the main thrust of the atonement then I say "baloney". What Jesus suffered was what we would have been destined for under the hand of God. Maybe not in exactly the same way because we are only men and not also divine, but the principle is there.
Once again you have jumped in on a subject late and started throwing bombs. That is what I was talking about. God can use evil men for his purposes and even have them do specific sins and yet they are still acting by their own free wills, and are still completely responsible for their evil actions.Egad Dave, we've been here before. The story of Joseph and his suffering from his brothers, probably the most complete type of Christ:
20 And as for you, ye meant evil against me; but God meant it for good, to bring to pass, as it is this day, to save much people alive. Gen 50
You said it better than I could and certainly more concise. Maybe even @kyredneck will be able to read this.Jesus came and took on Himself the curse given to men. This curse was not issued by Satan. Satan also received a curse of his own. Our responsibility in sin lies between ourselves and God. Satan may tempt us to sin, but that doesn’t ever give him authority to judge anyone. It makes him complicit in the wrong and worthy of judgment.
were we neutral bystanders
God can use evil men
It doesn’t matter how much bruising happens.Yes! Absolutely we were! I never drove any of those nails into His hands or feet, the Serpent did, through his emissaries.
It doesn’t matter how much bruising happens.
When someone lands a haymaker, it doesn’t make them the local magistrate, even if they think it.
When Satan bruised Christ, it didn’t make him the judge or executioner. Satan had no authority to do anything to Jesus. Jesus laid down his own life. Satan didn’t do anything judicially.
Yes! Absolutely we were! I never drove any of those nails into His hands or feet, the Serpent did, through his emissaries.
These two posts show what concerns me about Jon's views on the atonement and possibly the views of the early church. The truth is, while I hope had I been there, that I would not have participated and cheered but that I would have been disappointed and devastated, not knowing what was going on. And my first gut reaction would have been, I hope, that we had just suffered a horrible defeat at the hands of evil. So I agree with you at some level on that.These were not just 'any ol' evil men. They were children of the devil that did the works of the devil, fulfilling the 'germ of all prophecy' - Genesis 3:15.