I knew the story was suppressed. And I agree that it was election fraud. I just didn't know that the validity had been questioned.
Only by democrats, and the media—but I repeat myself.
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
I knew the story was suppressed. And I agree that it was election fraud. I just didn't know that the validity had been questioned.
That one, I agree.Only by democrats, and the media—but I repeat myself.
That one, I agree.
But I believe that false journalism directed at a candidate or party, and false statements by candidates, during an election is also voter fraud because they try to trick people into giving up their vote.
So obviously, given the integrity of our wonderful politicians, I see enough fraud to go around.
People expect falsehood to flow from the mouths of politicians. Most folks, general speaking I think, believe media outlets are biased one direction or another.That one, I agree.
But I believe that false journalism directed at a candidate or party, and false statements by candidates, during an election is also voter fraud because they try to trick people into giving up their vote.
So obviously, given the integrity of our wonderful politicians, I see enough fraud to go around.
That is a problem. Another is the conspiracy sites are no better. It becomes subjective truth....just pick which narrative suits you.People expect falsehood to flow from the mouths of politicians. Most folks, general speaking I think, believe media outlets are biased one direction or another.
But when professionals within our intelligence services, who are sworn to be unbiased, throw their integrity out the window and swear to a known falsehood for the purpose of election interference….
… they do enormous harm to the trust Americans have in those institutions…..
…. and…. Then you have folks readily believing any and every conspiracy that comes around and why not?????
If there is no institution within the government, or private institutions, that can be trusted to tell the truth (based on demonstrated corruption) then everything on the internet begins with the same level credibility for better or worse.
peace to you
I knew the story was suppressed. And I agree that it was election fraud. I just didn't know that the validity had been questioned.
Most folks only see the corruption of the leaders. As I said, the integrity of these agencies has been destroyed by obvious corruption.That is a problem. Another is the conspiracy sites are no better. It becomes subjective truth....just pick which narrative suits you.
That said, I do not believe the issue is corrupt government agencies as much as corrupt government leaders of those agencies. It is more what we see on the surface and how agencies are misused.
I say this as somebody who has worked for, or with, government agencies most of my life...DOD, DCSA, OPM, or DOE.....most working for these agencies have integrity. The problem is the high leadership positions are political.
Watch Min 39 to min 42
"Bidenomics" Exposed In Hilarious Viral Video (Ep. 2168) - 01/18/2023 (rumble.com)
They new in 2019