Neither can you. There is no AV1611 apograph, there were two “First Editions” of the AV1611 (Cambridge, Oxford) both with differences continuing on to this day. There have been several revisions/editions of the KJV with hundreds of differences collectively between them and a several hundred year history of corrections. Differences are differences whether one or 400 or 4000 in number, whether "big" or "small" in quality. God is no more capable of one or many “little” errors than He is one or many big ones.According to your logic, you cannot differentiate between what God actually said and what He has not said since you cannot appeal to one single source or translation as authoritative and definitive.
Since things which are different cannot be the same which of the following revisions of the AV1611 is the “authoritative Scriptures" 1613, 1629, 1638, 1644, 1664, 1701, 1744, 1762, 1769, or 1850?It all depends on which source scholars think is correct thereby making Scriptural authority to need the endorsement of scholarship. Whereas you profess belief in authority of the Scriptures, you have destroyed all possibility of any practical authority. All cannot be authoritative since they differ. Furthermore, the cumulative authority of all is meaningless since you cannot practically know which one is authoritative if authority is generalized to all and not specified as one source. Like all others who hold this position, you are talking gibberish. Thereby, you have negated the whole concept of authoritative Scriptures.
HankD