What is bolded is the problem with all assumptions and not just those expressed in this post but ALL assumptions. Assumptions based upon opinion are generally subject to modifications according to maturity, age, feelings, health, wealth ... such assumptions can in fact can be corrupted. I saw this "corruption" in of some "opinions" expressed as "your not right with God if ..." statements made in both the IFB and SBC when folks wanted to put forth their own agenda and not face truthful questioning.
Yeshua's post is certainly not corrupt, and, that many do have this thinking, is why I think that a response is in obliged.
What I presented in this thread previously is what is consistent with the Scriptures, and although we do not live under the Jewish customs and Law, it nevertheless brings certain blessings - as Yeshua states - when a form of it is still followed as it pertains to parental authority.
First, look at the age problem:
No where in Scriptures is age considered a factor when it comes to marriage. There is no "legal age" or "under age" or any other age related element to marriage (Lest someone think that Paul did, remember Paul in Corinthians stated he was not giving information from the Lord - but his own feelings for the time the church was under huge persecution).
The thinking of the parents having authority "until the children become adults" is not found in Scriptures. Certainly, the scriptures portray the single males as responding to the head of the family long after what we could consider adult age, and females were under the head of the family authority until marriage.
So, to have an age related condition of who gets to decide on marriage, just isn't part of the Scriptures and when there is structures exampled and followed for millennia, then it follows that it is applicable in some form in the modern times.
Here is another danger with the "age related" decision making. WHO sets the age?
Is it the willful teen who thinks love is forever?See, the problem is that there can only be one true standard - that which unchangeable - the Scriptures.
Is it the stogy old librarian who would find more warmth in a book?
Is it the local preacher who may be no better than a snake oil salesman?
Is it the legal representative that is embedded with political graft?
Is it the Scriptures that are silent on when an adult becomes an adult?
Is it the traditions of the ancients that are not static but changed by geography?
As the Scriptures do indicate, the final authority of the home is placed as the responsibility of the father.
The woman then is given from the authority of the father to the authority of the husband at the marriage.
Modern folks may not like it, but neither do they like to keep the ten commandments - especially number 7 and closely followed by 10.
i don't see us that far apart, as do agree that its normally much better to have parental approval and blessings, my concern is when one takes that to mean ALWAYS must have them to proceeed, even when the reasons to deny their wedding are NOT scriptural basis!