• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

questions about the church

TCassidy

Late-Administator Emeritus
Administrator
First of all, could you please learn to use the quote function properly, then do a little judicious editing. It is not necessary to quote everything the previous poster posted, just that to which you are replying.
Originally posted by ituttut:
Agree, as you can see in my post of the “called out” Quote “There was a church before Jesus with promises of this earth; they (Israel) were “called out.”
No. You seem to have missed the point. The point was that the church (ekklhsia) is more than just "called out." It is a called out assembly
Unquote. Their promises were of the “earth”. We agree.
No, we don't. You have drifted way off the topic. Let's try to stick to the topic. The Identity of the New Testament Church.
How can that be – Acts 7:38, ”This is he, that was in the church in the wilderness with the angel which spake to him in the mount Sina, and with our fathers: who received the lively oracles to give unto us”. You are correct that the Body of Christ is a NT phenomenon, once Christ revealed this information to us.
Because the word is "assembly." They were an assembly in the wilderness. They were not a "church" in the New Testament sense. Again, lets get back on the subject The Identity of the New Testament Church.
You have misread, and contradicted yourself, as to you contention that there is no “universal” church. You are saying “each and every scriptural local church is a body of believers belonging to Christ, the body of Christ: You speak of a “universal” church, unless you are saying Christ Jesus is not the head of the Body.
Once again you have failed to understand. I did not mention a "universal church." I spoke only of each local church over which the Lord is Head.
But Cassidy does it not strike you as odd that you could not have known this if you hadn’t read the writings of Paul first? What does Jesus say, and what was understood while He was on earth? ”The law and the prophets were until John: since that time the kingdom of God is preached, and every man presseth into it,” Luke 16:16. The law and the prophets were not “mystery”, and the kingdom of God is “at hand” that was preached by John the Baptist, Jesus and the Apostles is no “mystery”.
Once again you have failed to stay on the subject, The Identity of the New Testament Church.
Please enlighten me by scripture free of contradiction with the Word.
The Scriptures don't contradict themselves. Just read 1 Thess 4 and see that it is all the saints who will be caught up, not just church members.
Do I understand you correctly? If so, you believe the same as I, we all being baptized with the Holy Spirit.
No. I am not a Crazymatic. The Baptism of the Holy Spirit was a one-time event that took place on the day of Pentecost.
Are, are you saying all that are “water baptized” will be caught up?
No, I am saying exactly what I said. All the saints will be caught up.
Where is the “mystery” if all is the same as before (without the Only Begotten Son of God)? We are in the Body of Christ the Church.
It is now plain to me that you don't understand what "mystery" means. When we see the word "mystery" in our bibles it does not mean "who done it" but rather, the unveiling of that which was previously unknown. The church of the gentiles was previously unknown to the Jews.

I have snipped the rest for most of it is off topic and much to convoluted.
 

HankD

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
How can that be – Acts 7:38, ”This is he, that was in the church in the wilderness with the angel which spake to him in the mount Sina, and with our fathers: who received the lively oracles to give unto us”.
Indeed this word is ekklesia, however it is not an exclusively theological kind of word even in the NT koine as the English word "Church".

It is used in the following way in other places in the Acts:

Acts 19:32 Some therefore cried one thing, and some another: for the assembly was confused; and the more part knew not wherefore they were come together.

Acts 19:39 But if ye enquire any thing concerning other matters, it shall be determined in a lawful assembly.

Acts 19:40 For we are in danger to be called in question for this day's uproar, there being no cause whereby we may give an account of this concourse. 41 And when he had thus spoken, he dismissed the assembly.

HankD
 

4study

New Member
HankD,

Are you saying that out of these nations in Genesis 10 there will be those who have been "born again" before the advent of the New Covenant?
70 is not really a cardinal adjective in this case but a number that conotes an idea. The idea is in my head but hard to explain. Probably because I'm still forumulating as I study about it. It seems to me that God divided the families of Gen. 10 into nations. These nations had a particular function. Similar to the functions we recognize of nations today; government, sterwardship, commerce, etc.. I think this is a reflection of what will be in the kingdom of God.

Yes, I believe there are born-again peoples in the nations of Gen. 10.

If so, are these the "the nations of them which are saved" in the Revelation?
Perhaps. The nations of Revelation, IMO, are composed of those born-again througout all ages.

Now, do you know of any Scripture that indicate folks could be born of the Spirit before the advent of the New Covenant?
I'm not sure what you mean by "born of the Spirit". I'll continue to use "born again". It's more of one of my fundamental ideas so I think there are all kinds of scriptures about it. I would point to those about faith; Romans 3,4 (Abraham), Gal. 3, Hebrews 11. etc.. There are many others, just thinking off the top of my head.
 

HankD

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
OK, also John 3 where Jesus asks
"Art thou a master of Israel, and knowest not these things?" because Nicodemus did not know what He meant by the words "born again" and Jesus implied that he should have.

HankD
 
TCassidy and I agree on the nature of the "true" church - local, visible, assembly of scripturally immersed believers, like the one Jesus built during His earthly ministry, as we are "like Adam"
by genetic heritage. We do not speak of "the universal man," but of "mankind," "the human family," etc; why not speak of the spiritual family, or family of God, or the "born-again" when we refer to all believers? Good Bible words.

While the following refs do not use the term
"born of the Spirit," they do refer to the Holy Spirit filling and indwelling believers in the OT (I believe there was a question above on this?)

Joseph - Genesis 41:38
Bezaleel - Ex. 25:34-36:1
Caleb - Numbers 14:24
Joshua - Numbers 27:18
Gideon - Judges 6:34 ("Spirit clothed Himself
with Gideon," Hebrew)
Many prophets - Nehemiah 9:30
Saved Israelites - Isaiah 63:11 (KJ uses sing.,
Moses only)
Ezekiel - Ezk. 2:2, 3:24
Daniel - Dan. 4:8, 9, 18; 5:11; [6:3?]

And by the testimony of I Peter 1:10-11, every
writer of OT prophetic Scripture was indwelt at least at some point(s) for that purpose. Whether any of these were permanent, "sealed" indwellings
or fillings, is not spelled out in the OT (part of Ituttut's mystery, I guess!).

Since this "testimony of the preposition" is usually overlooked in the interests of a predetermined view, it may be of value to note it.

Best - Charles - Ro. 8:28
 

ituttut

New Member
Originally posted by TCassidy:
First of all, could you please learn to use the quote function properly, then do a little judicious editing. It is not necessary to quote everything the previous poster posted, just that to which you are replying.

Sorry, but I am not one of your students, and did not know I was upsetting you. Notice you are a Professor, and I congratulate you. I don’t however believe this title gives a right of holding animus, and nattering does not help.

As you may have noticed, I don’t spend too much active time on this board and like references in front of me. I work best in my own environment, and endure procedure’s different than mine, without whining.

</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by ituttut:
QUOTE]No. You seem to have missed the point.

I don’t believe I did.

The point was that the church (ekklhsia) is more than just "called out." It is a called out assembly

I agree.

Their promises were of the “earth”. We agree.
No, we don't.


You don’t believe God made covenant, and oath of promise to Abraham, and his seed?

(snipped as outside of responders range) Again, lets get back on the subject The Identity of the New Testament Church.

You have misread, and contradicted yourself, as to you contention that there is no “universal” church. You are saying “each and every scriptural local church is a body of believers belonging to Christ, the body of Christ: You speak of a “universal” church, unless you are saying Christ Jesus is not the head of the Body.
Once again you have failed to understand. I did not mention a "universal church." I spoke only of each local church over which the Lord is Head.

You speak well, and you speak of the “universal church” of the Body of Christ, within the genus of that Church.

But Cassidy does it not strike you as odd that you could not have known this if you hadn’t read the writings of Paul first? What does Jesus say, and what was understood while He was on earth? ”The law and the prophets were until John: since that time the kingdom of God is preached, and every man presseth into it,” Luke 16:16. The law and the prophets were not “mystery”, and the kingdom of God is “at hand” that was preached by John the Baptist, Jesus and the Apostles is no “mystery”.
Once again you have failed to stay on the subject, The Identity of the New Testament Church.

I see these topics throw you off course, so I’ll try to follow wherever you may wish to go. But if not understood how are we to know the Identity of the New Testament Body of Christ, for the Body of Christ was not known until Christ revealed it from heaven?

Please enlighten me by scripture free of contradiction with the Word.
The Scriptures don't contradict themselves. Just read 1 Thess 4 and see that it is all the saints who will be caught up, not just church members.

Will all be raised at the Rapture? I don’t see how for those of old are of “prophecy”. The Body of Christ is a mystery, and not in prophecy and we being caught up to Christ in the air was only known by God. The rapture is for those in the “mystery”, and this is Our resurrection, Jesus Christ’s “inheritance”. We are already with Him in heaven when that “first” resurrection occurs, which is after Christ Jesus comes to this earth again, as the King of the Jews.

Do I understand you correctly? If so, you believe the same as I, we all being baptized with the Holy Spirit.
No. I am not a Crazymatic. The Baptism of the Holy Spirit was a one-time event that took place on the day of Pentecost.

I thought Jesus was the first one baptized of the Holy Ghost, and then the 120. Christ’s chosen Apostle to the Gentile, Paul is a “Crazymatic”? I’ll not try to intervene here between you two.

Are, are you saying all that are “water baptized” will be caught up?
No, I am saying exactly what I said. All the saints will be caught up.

[/qb]We at the rapture, and the others later.


Where is the “mystery” if all is the same as before (without the Only Begotten Son of God)? We are in the Body of Christ the Church.
It is now plain to me that you don't understand what "mystery" means. When we see the word "mystery" in our bibles it does not mean "who done it" but rather, the unveiling of that which was previously unknown. The church of the gentiles was previously unknown to the Jews.

The Body of Christ was not known by anyone, save God. See, you do agree with me, for that is what I have been presenting to you, but today you must allow the Jew in for they are saved in the same manner as we. You are preaching the “dispensational” gospel of Paul, and don’t know it. We today live in the secret time of the Body of Christ. Salvation in the genus of His Church is “universal”.
I have snipped the rest for most of it is off topic and much to convoluted.
</font>
Your privilege.
 

Bro. James

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Compare: the Shekinah Glory of God, indwelling the Holy of Holies in Israel and the "hagion pneuma" indwelling the New Testament Assembly.

New Testament Assemblies become much easier to identify. The pillar and ground of the Truth is still out there--preserved by The Spirit, The Holy. Not all "Churches" qualify.

Selah,

Bro. James
 

ituttut

New Member
Originally posted by R. Charles Blair:
And by the testimony of I Peter 1:10-11, every writer of OT prophetic Scripture was indwelt at least at some point(s) for that purpose. Whether any of these were permanent, "sealed" indwellings
or fillings, is not spelled out in the OT (part of Ituttut's mystery, I guess!).
Hello Pastor Blair. I see I’m referenced in your post of November 5. Thanks for the complement of the “mystery” being conveyed to me from Christ in heaven, but for the record the “secret” in the “mysteries of God” was revealed to Paul, and I have never laid claim otherwise.
 

ituttut

New Member
Originally posted by Bro. James:
Compare: the Shekinah Glory of God, indwelling the Holy of Holies in Israel and the "hagion pneuma" indwelling the New Testament Assembly.

Fully agree that Pentecostal indwelling.

New Testament Assemblies become much easier to identify. The pillar and ground of the Truth is still out there--preserved by The Spirit, The Holy. Not all "Churches" qualify.

Selah,

Bro. James
Christ Jesus is in the presence of the Glory of His Father in heaven, allowing even we Gentiles into the Holy of Holies, baptized by the Spirit.
 
Hey, brother Ituttut - term used in the same sense as someone might say "Brother Blair's landmarkism" - the subject of which one speaks often, dear to their heart. Trust all is well in your world. Best - Charles - Ro. 8:28
 

ituttut

New Member
Originally posted by R. Charles Blair:
Hey, brother Ituttut - term used in the same sense as someone might say "Brother Blair's landmarkism" - the subject of which one speaks often, dear to their heart. Trust all is well in your world. Best - Charles - Ro. 8:28
Love in the heart here Charles, as I know in your world. Christian faith, James Galatians 1:11-12
 

ituttut

New Member
Originally posted by ituttut:
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by R. Charles Blair:
Hey, brother Ituttut - term used in the same sense as someone might say "Brother Blair's landmarkism" - the subject of which one speaks often, dear to their heart. Trust all is well in your world. Best - Charles - Ro. 8:28
</font>[/QUOTE]Love in the heart here Charles, as I know in your world. Christian faith, James - Galatians 1:11-12
 
Top