Maybe you didn't read my earlier post so I will quote it here:Originally posted by Frogman:
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by gb93433:
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by Frogman:
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by gb93433:
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by Carson Weber:
Hi gb93433,
Thew word for "Corresponding to that" is the word antitupon. Which means counterpart or antitype. An antitype is "something that is foreshadowed by a type or symbol, as a New Testament event prefigured in the Old Testament."
I agree with every word that you have stated. It is precisely by the reason that the Great Deluge is a foretype of baptism that we are able to see the saving effects of baptism. This fact only bolsters the truth, which Peter expresses. This truth is that, "eight persons were saved through water. Baptism, which corresponds to this, now saves you."
Infants can appeal to God for a clear conscience through the resurrection of Jesus Christ in the same way that all other Christians make this appeal: through baptism.
If one were to take look at the context of baptism in the NT it males sense to believe that someone who was baptized was also saved. During the writing of the NT the emperor was declared as Lord and some thought of themselves as divine. When someone was baptized they now declared Christ as their Lord and therefore placing their allegiance in Christ instead of the emperor. Because of naming Christ as Lord it meant that they in effect were renouncing the emperor as their lord and one could lose their life should the emperor decide to have that new believer executed. The believers during the time of the NT did not separate baptism and salvation as we do. Wouldn’t you say if someone was willing to follow Christ and name him as their Lord and risking their life because of this that they would be saved? </font>[/QUOTE]So salvation is not by faith, nor is it by Grace, but by the work of public profession and then can't be shown to be certain except in regions in which you will certainly lose your life by making such profession, therefore, salvation is not only through profession or baptism, but now through martyrdom
I am beginning to understand now, but I don't see 'by Grace through faith'. Maybe I am just a slow learner.
Bro. Dallas </font>[/QUOTE]Isn't folowing Christ by faith? At least that's what Heb. 11:6 says.
If you are not walking by faith then how can you be following Christ?
Wouldn't you say that someone who is willing to take the kind of stand I talked about is trusting in Christ by faith for their salvation. Otherwise it is for nohing other than a public spectacle. </font>[/QUOTE]I do not disagree with what you are saying in principle. But I disagree in equating this 'act' or any other of meriting[sp?] eternal salvation.
In speaking of the type of Noah and the ark, it is not baptism that is important, it is being in the Ark, it is the Ark that typifies Christ. Now, to say there is such a thing as a 'desire' to be baptized but being legitimately hindered doesn't line up with scripture either.
Christ never made specification such as a desire for anything. He plainly and clearly stated:
Mark 16:16 He that believeth and is baptized shall be saved; but he that believeth not shall be damned.
If baptism is a means for me, then it becomes a means for the Son of God to become what he already was the Lamb of God.
Bro. Dallas </font>[/QUOTE]Iwas not dealing with the entire subjeet of salvation but just the one verse in 1 Peter 3
Just as you pointed out in Mark 16:16 "He that believeth and is baptized shall be saved; but he that believeth not shall be damned." The early church never separated baptism and salvation like we do. Baptism is not a means of salvation but a public proof that you are confessing Christ as your Lord and therby renouncing the emperor as your lord. For this one could possibly be executed in those days.