So if a guy says, "Because kids cost too much and the wife would have to stay home and keep them" that would be okay? I think that would show a great misunderstanding of both family and money that would disqualify him.
Well, my guess is that attitude would come out in other ways without needing to ask a personal and potentially painful question. Maybe, "How do you feel about children?" or "What is your perspective on the value of raising children?" That would be more appropriate than asking a person why they and their spouses don't have children.
I also believe that there are some married people who are called to things besides parenting, regardless of the physical possibility. I know there are many who would disagree, but that's where I am on the issue at the moment.
Do you think God knew all of this when he said that? Of course you do (I think). So how are we to understand that because you seem to be saying that it really doesn't matter what his kids are like. I don't want to misunderstand you though.
No, I'm not saying it doesn't matter. It may be obvious that his children are poorly trained. But it's not necessarily that simple. I think asking about and observing the methods of parenting would be more telling. There are many parents who are not good parents, even if they strongly desire to be. In that case, there might be better candidates. But if a candidate is struggling in particular with one or more children, it should be taken into account.
Additionally, we need to look more closely at the context of that text, both textual and historical. We need to know to whom Paul was speaking and why. I'm not an exegete and, though I've studied theology extensively, I am not as proficient in Pauline interpretation as I'd like to be.
I am all about proper forms. That has been my emphasis -- biblical conflict resolution.
Really? I would say if they never disagreed they are either disengaged or lying. But fight? My wife and I don't fight. So you think we are either disengaged or lying?
I suppose disagreement could be interpreted as fighting, but not necessarily. Different people have different temperaments and navigate administration of relationship differently. This is not to excuse abusive behavior or violent arguments.
There are also cases in which people think they're being civil when they are really just repressed. I'm not for a moment suggesting that about you and your spouse, but there are couples I know who are like that (my parents).
Larry, I can tell you are a very thoughtful gentleman. Thank you for respectful and engaging discussion. It is a pleasant contrast to a few other tactics we see from time to time.
Blessings.