Quote Stacking v. Source Grounding

[Logos1560]

you need to demonstrate the actual correspondence in context, not just assert it.

You do not practice what you preach. You keep merely asserting your claims without demonstrating them to be true. Your argument has been soundly addressed regardless of your refusal to accept it.

Verifiable facts and truth have been presented for you whether you accept it or not. You try to dismiss the truth and pretend that it has not been presented.

 

[Anthony Pritchard]

You do not practice what you preach. You keep merely asserting your claims without demonstrating them to be true. Your argument has been soundly addressed regardless of your refusal to accept it.

Verifiable facts and truth have been presented for you whether you accept it or not. You try to dismiss the truth and pretend that it has not been presented.

You keep saying “verifiable facts have been presented,” but you still haven’t demonstrated the specific correspondence I asked for. I’m not asking for declarations; I’m asking for contextual evidence. Until you show that, your claim remains an assertion, not a demonstration.

 

[Logos1560]

I’m asking for contextual evidence. Until you show that, your claim remains an assertion, not a demonstration.

You have not demonstrated your assertions to be true. You have been given sound contextual evidence. You do not determine what evidence is valid for countering your unproven claims. Your claims remain assertions, not demonstrations.

 

[Anthony Pritchard]

You have not demonstrated your assertions to be true.

You’re repeating my phrasing without addressing the point. I asked for contextual evidence for your specific claim. You have not provided any.

You quoted Burgon on the Textus Receptus, which I did not mention. Those quotations do not demonstrate that Burgon rejected a preserved stream, nor do they show that he supported your position.

If you wish to assert that Burgon held your view, provide direct quotations where he states it. Until you do, your claim remains an assertion, not a demonstration.