It is definately not worth arguing about, and belittling pre-tribbers. AFAIC, you can't disprove any trib stance, so why get all huffy about it ?
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Thanks for the info Pastor Larry, someday I would like to buy these books and read them. After all most of the book I own are heresy.Originally posted by Pastor Larry:
The pretrib position is still the only one that can be maintained in light of all Scripture. Two excellent source (for the many here who appear not to have read them), are Walvoord, The Rapture Question and, probably better, Gerald Stanton, Kept From the Hour.
This is really where I have problems, not so much with pre-trib.Originally posted by Bro. Curtis:
I definately believe there is a difference.
You are wrong, plain and simple. You may disagree but it is a simple matter of being blind to the words of Scripture that leads you to "mean" that it has no support. At this point, I do not mean to be mean or insenstive, but if you conclusively disprove the pretrib position, you will be the first in history and I daresay you wouldn't be posting here. You would be publishing your work. Indeed I would be interested in reading it to see you answer the questions.Originally posted by Dave Bussard:
Pastor Larry>However, do not pretend that the pretrib position is poorly argued for or has no support.
Oh, we are not pretending! We mean it!![]()
It is interesting Dave that you bring up 2 Thessalonians. Perhaps you can explain to us why the Thessalonians were unsettled to believe that they were in the DOL. If they were posttribulationists, as you are, woulnd't they have been expecting it??Originally posted by Dave Bussard:
...For further explanation see 2 Thessalonians Part 1, 2, 3 at: