Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Hey AbiyahOriginally posted by Abiyah:
Alice Cooper is a Christian artist? I thought it was a wild, worldly extra-hard rock band! I had no idea! And I didn't know the others you men-
tioned were Christian groups.
That's great Abiyah. If there's anything I can do to help, let me know. Also, Mr Curtis has excellent taste in that kind of music and I'm sure he would be glad to help you, too.Specifically to Smoke Eater, you have mentioned many groups and singers as singing Christian music--singers I would not normaly bother to listen to. I don't like Country music, but that is mainly because I don't like the subject matter and too many I had heard in my early years could not sing on key. Furthermore, the nasal quality was irritating.
But you have sparked my interest. I shall check
out some of these people you have mentioned.
That's the guy.Originally posted by Abiyah:
Thank you, Smoke Eater! 8o)
Is the person known as Alice Cooper the guy on
the TV ad, wearing a garishly-painted black and
white face, who gives an excellent spoken mes-
sage on family values, with the last scene being
him jumping rope. Ttwo little children are turn-
ing the rope, and he jumps to the seesaw rhyme
which begins, "My name is Alice; I live in a palace . . . ."
Originally posted by M Wickens:
A few random thoughts on this topic...
[qb]There's not one but it's not prohibited, either.Can anyone show me the Biblical example for using music to reach the lost? I'll not argue that it can/should be used but as for making evangelism the main purpose of music extreme caution should be used.
I don't like the idea of making the music the attraction to the Gospel.
CCM'er, Mylon LeFevre has said many times that he considered the music as nothing more than a lure to get kids inside to hear the Gospel.
I hate that. It's awfully manipulative and I think that the gospel ought to be able to stand on it's own.
I do believe, though, that music is an acceptable art form for Christians and that there's nothing wrong with a Christian expressing himself and his worldview through music.
The Bible tells us that the carnal man is at emnity with God.Are the lost more apt to follow the flesh or Christ?
You still haven't demonstrated that it's "their" music.Should we take their music, put God's Word's to it and expect it to be blessed.
There are numerous blues songs of the thirties and R&B songs of the 40's and pre rock 50's (the most popular is "Roll With Me, Henry") that include the phrase "rock and roll" in some form and it's generally excepted to be an antiquated slang term for sex.Rock music cannot be Christian. Consider the relation rock has to music; where did the term "rock and roll" come from?
But are you judging an entire genre of music on it's merits or on what people call it?
The communists also banned religion and persecuted Christians. What's your point?The Communist regime would not allow Rock music as they saw that it encouraged rebellion.
You just said that they didn't allow rock music.And it was the music not the words that encouraged rebellion. That is why Russians under that regime listened to English rock, not for the lyrics but the music itself.
Again, why can't you make music just for the saje of art?Music does not have to be liked by us, it has to 1. Glorify God, 2. Instruct believers, 3. Edify believers and then at a stretch be used for evangelism.
I've followed CCM for roughly fifteen years now, was involved in the production end of CCM for about eight years and, for a brief, unfortunate time in the early nineties, even played CCM.Why is the music usually changed? Because, for example, little Jimmy is backslidden and not attending church. What is the answer? Let's take his music that in a backslidden state he enjoys and put our words to it! Does this seem like flawed logic to anyone else?
I've never run across anyone who held to this logic.
[ September 09, 2002, 07:26 PM: Message edited by: Smoke_Eater ]
Wouldn't argue that one with you. Music can be used for evangelism, just carefully.There's not one but it's not prohibited, either.
Ever seen the scene in a night club where people are musically induced to seing their hips and the fleshly result of the music is easy to see? Surely music that is so sexually emotive cannot be right. I know there are many types of CCM but much of it is that way. Even the country music style stuff is that way. Garth Brooks has been quoted as saying concering country music "It is sex." Ever tried dancing to the traditional style of hymn music?You still haven't demonstrated that it's "their" music.
I am judging rock by its sounds and the effects it has on people.But are you judging an entire genre of music on it's merits or on what people call it?
The communists had a lot of wrong going on. But look at the reasons for opposing the things they did. Obviously going against Christianity is wrong. But why oppose rock music? Because they saw the effect it had on people, it encouraged rebellion.The communists also banned religion and persecuted Christians. What's your point?
You just said that they didn't allow rock music.
But does that art edify? I would listen to classical. People say that is hypocritical but not when you analyse the music. Classical can be relaxing and is proven in studies to encourage thought and is academically profitable. I AM NOT saying people who don't listen to other types of music are stupid.Again, why can't you make music just for the sakje of art?
But that is the logic with many. "Let's use the style of music they like so that we get them to church"I've never run across anyone who held to this logic.
Originally posted by M Wickens:
Rock music cannot be Christian. Consider the relation rock has to music; where did the term "rock and roll" come from?
And where did the church "steeple" come from? Can that be Christian?
What is the answer? Let's take his music that in a backslidden state he enjoys and put our words to it! Does this seem like flawed logic to anyone else?
Was it "flawed logic" for Paul to tell the men of Athens by their alter To the unknown God-- one altar among many-- he was going to tell them about this God they worship in ignorance (Acts 17:23)?
You're falsely assuming that that represents a large part of rock and roll and it doesn't.Originally posted by M Wickens:
Ever seen the scene in a night club where people are musically induced to seing their hips and the fleshly result of the music is easy to see? Surely music that is so sexually emotive cannot be right.
Examples, please.I know there are many types of CCM but much of it is that way.
Bad example. Garth Brooks isn't country and shouldn't be considered any sort of authority on country music.Even the country music style stuff is that way. Garth Brooks has been quoted as saying concering country music "It is sex."
Can't say I have but it's not made for dancing, is it?Ever tried dancing to the traditional style of hymn music?
But you're assuming that all rock music is the same and that music affects eveyone in the same way.I am judging rock by its sounds and the effects it has on people.
And the criminalization of drugs has been a disaster. In the same way, the church waged a war against a cultural and artistic movement that it could never win when, instead, teh church could have made a huge impact for Christ.Drugs are not permitted, illegally they still get through though. It may have been illegal, but rock music still got through.
Yes, many of us would argue that it does. It edifies me, anyway.But does that art edify?
I think it could be hypocritical, in a sense.I would listen to classical. People say that is hypocritical but not when you analyse the music.
Studies do shoe that people who listen to classical music do tend to be better educated than average and they do show that abies forced to listen to classical music are, on average, smarter but, my education being in sociology, I would tend to think that there are other familial conditions at play here.Classical can be relaxing and is proven in studies to encourage thought and is academically profitable. I AM NOT saying people who don't listen to other types of music are stupid.But studies show positive results from certain music types but not others. (Rock etc.)![]()
True, but the opposite is also true. What you would consider pornography, many of us would consider art."One mans art is another man's pornography."
Sorry, that's not what I understood your previous post to say.But that is the logic with many. "Let's use the style of music they like so that we get them to church"
When you felt transported by Mozart or Brahms, it wasn’t your body that was transported. The sensation often described is a body yearning to follow where its spirit has gone -- the sense of a body being tugged upward, rising a little where you sit. And you almost always sit. And, for the most part, you sit comparatively still. The music doesn’t change your body.
The classical dance that grew from this music had a stiff, straight back and moved in almost geometrical lines. The folk dances of the West were also physically contained, with linear gestures. The feet might move with wonderful flurries and intricate precision, but the hips and the spine were kept rigid.
Originally posted by Smoke_Eater:
Why thank you, Mike. That's very nice. My dad got me into the 4-H club very early in life. Hank Locklin, Hank Thompson, Hank Snow, & Hank Williams. And all the Buck Owens, Merle Haggard, & Johnny Cash didn't hurt, either. My dad also had a very extensive collection of bluegrass gospel songs, and there was always great music at our house. I learned to love good music at a very young age.That's great Abiyah. If there's anything I can do to help, let me know. Also, Mr Curtis has excellent taste in that kind of music and I'm sure he would be glad to help you, too.
Mike
BTW, thanx for the shout about Jorma's new record. I love it. And the song "What are They Doing in Heaven Today" is just beautiful.
I believe that your beat very likely would distract sinners from the message of the song. That is the beauty of hymns: everything about it, including the music, points to the lyrics, which often deliver the message in the clearest way possible. Your beat did indeed ruin the song by diverting attention away from the message to the groovy, cool, sensual beat. I grew up in CCM, and I now hate it with a passion. At the same time, my love for the traditional hymns deepens every day. If you wish to best use your music for church evangelism, then I would suggest learning the piano and/or organ.Originally posted by Grizzly660:
Also, I'm a drummer and a group of young adults played Amazing Grace in a new way the other day. We made it 4/4 time and put a "Rock beat" to it.
Wow! It rocked but still kept God's Grace Amazing!![]()
What do you say about that? Did we de-sanctify the song or ruin it with a sinful beat?
![]()
Thanks.