• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Re: Mark 16:9-20 being Holy Scripture.

Van

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
No. Mary M saw Jesus' before the other women.
We have been through all this before, and you continue to avoid the issue. Did anyone say Mary Magdalene was with the women when they encountered Jesus? Nope. What scripture says is Mary Magdalene was with the women when they reported to the disciples. Thus the women saw Jesus before Mary Magdalen returned to the empty tomb with Peter and John and saw Jesus.

Note the reason why Mary Magdalene did not see Jesus, before the returning women, was ignored, and the questionable premise simply repeated.
 

37818

Well-Known Member
Yes the other women saw Jesus before Mary M.
Your wrong interpretation. From my view.
We have been through all this before, and you continue to avoid the issue. Did anyone say Mary Magdalene was with the women when they encountered Jesus? Nope. What scripture says is Mary Magdalene was with the women when they reported to the disciples. Thus the women saw Jesus before Mary Magdalen returned to the empty tomb with Peter and John and saw Jesus.

Note the reason why Mary Magdalene did not see Jesus, before the returning women, was ignored, and the questionable premise simply repeated.
Mary M told Peter and John before the other women.
Per John 20:2.
Luke 24:10.
 

Van

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Your wrong interpretation. From my view.

Mary M told Peter and John before the other women.
Per John 20:2.
Luke 24:10.
She was still with the women before the disciples left. Luke 24:10-12. Thus after the women saw Jesus while on their way to tell the disciples.
 

37818

Well-Known Member
She was still with the women before the disciples left. Luke 24:10-12. Thus after the women saw Jesus while on their way to tell the disciples.
No. John 20:1-2, Mary M ran off as soon as she saw the stone had been rolled away. Which Matthew, Mark and Luke didn't report.
 

Van

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
No. John 20:1-2, Mary M ran off as soon as she saw the stone had been rolled away. Which Matthew, Mark and Luke didn't report.
You are wasting my time. Address Luke 24:10-12. She was still with the others before the disciples left for the tomb. But before they received the report, the others saw Jesus. John 20:1-2 does not say this was the first appearance.
 

37818

Well-Known Member
You are wasting my time. Address Luke 24:10-12. She was still with the others before the disciples left for the tomb. But before they received the report, the others saw Jesus. John 20:1-2 does not say this was the first appearance.
Again, you are very wrong.
No. John 20:1-2, Mary M ran off as soon as she saw the stone had been rolled away. Which Matthew, Mark and Luke didn't report.
 

Van

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Again, you are very wrong.
You are wasting my time with avoidance. You have not addressed the issue.
Mary Magdalene did not return to the tomb before the women who had seen Jesus reported to the disciples.
It is a lock.
 

Van

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Yes, the questionably validity of Mark 16:9-20 is in dispute, with some early historians throwing cold water on the passage as others, see above, seeming to think it is valid. But the fact remains, today some scholars believe the passage is valid, whereas, the majority of scholars believe it is questionable.

I have provided several of the reasons why most scholars question its valid. No one has explained Mary Magdalene being said to be first to see Jesus in Mark 16:9, when she saw Jesus after she returned with the disciples, when others saw Jesus before they reached the disciples.
The case has been made. Nuff said...
 
Top