• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Reading the word of God repeatly

evangelist6589

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
I am reading 1 john everyday for 30 days or more. Already I am seeing some flaws in 2 of the evangelism books I am reading. I will get back to Tell the Truth by Metzger soon which is more balanced. I challenge others to get more in the word of God as what I am resolved to do this new year. Buy study guides, commentaries and such. Do not buy as many theology and Christian living books which are not as helpful as biblical studies type books. Greek Tim can go into the depth of detail between a theology book and a biblical studies book like a commentary or study guide.
 

Jordan Kurecki

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
"... by laying aside commentaries, and almost every other book, and simply reading the word of God and studying it. The result was, that the first evening that I shut my self into my room, to give myself to prayer and meditation over the scriptures, I learned more in a few hours than I had done during the several months previously. But the particular difference was, that I received real strength for my soul in doing so."

-George Muller
 

evangelist6589

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
That's one opinion. We do need commentaries and such to help us learn. If you disagree stop going to church.
 

PreachTony

Active Member
That's one opinion. We do need commentaries and such to help us learn. If you disagree stop going to church.

That's a bit of an over-reaction, isn't it, Evan? So if we don't agree with you on using commentaries and studies guides, but instead say that scripture alone is sufficient, then we just shouldn't go to church?
 

annsni

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
From Jen Wilkin's "Women of the Word" which is not just for women, IMO.

Learning the Bible is a quest for knowledge, but it is ultimately a quest for understanding. Unlike a newspaper, the Bible is far more than a delivery system for information - it aims to shape the way we think. This means that, more often than not, we should expect to experience frustration when we sit down to read it.

Do you expect to be met with frustration when you study the Bible? How do you react to the dissonance you feel when your understanding is no equal to a passage? As adults, we no longer must stick to a course of study because a teacher or parent is holding us accountable. If we give in to impatience with the learning process, we tend to react in one of two ways:

1. We give up. Finding studying the Bible to be too confusing, many of us think "this must not be my area of gifting" and we move on to aspects of our faith that come more naturally. We allow sermons, podcasts, books or blogs to be our sole source of intake for the Bible. We may read the Bible devotionally, but we assume that we are just not wired to learn in any sort of structured way.

2. We look for a shortcut. Wanting to remove as quickly as possible our sense of feeling lost in a text, we run to the notes in our study Bible immediately after reading it. Or we keep a commentary handy so we can consult it at the first signs of confusion. And thanks to the internet, help is never far away. If we read something confusing, there is no need for tears of frustration - we can simply read what the note in our study Bible says or look up an answer to our question online. But is having interpretive help readily available as helpful as it seems? Or do we end up like those kids in high school English who never actually read a book because the CliffsNotes or the movie was easily available? In reality, using a shortcut is only marginally better than giving up because it does not honor the learning process. By hurrying to eliminate the dissonance of the "I don't know" moment, it actually diminishes the effectiveness of the "aha moment" of discovery.

Commentaries and study Bibles should not be our main source of Bible wisdom. Let the Word speak.

BTW Evan - This woman has a GREAT study on 1, 2, 3 John that even my husband has listened to and learned from Do a Google search for her and you can listen to her podcasts. She has you reading through the letters at least once a week and if possible even more. It's a GREAT set of letters and we are even working through 1 John in church on Sunday. :)
 

blessedwife318

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Once again Evan shows that he does not believe in sola scriptura.

There had to be a point in ones Christian walk where we don't need books to be our crutch in studying the Bible but instead can study the Bible itself comparing Scripture with Scripture and relying in the Holy Spirits illumination.
 

Greektim

Well-Known Member
That's a bit of an over-reaction, isn't it, Evan? So if we don't agree with you on using commentaries and studies guides, but instead say that scripture alone is sufficient, then we just shouldn't go to church?
He's just saying that if you can't learn from a teacher who has put his teachings on the printed page (or ebook), then why bother with a teacher who puts his teaching in the spoken forum?

And people... Sola Scriptura does not mean that we only use the Bible. It means that it is the sole source for our faith and practice. But that doesn't neglect the reality that God has equipped the church w/ teachers to help us understand the Bible better.
 

Rolfe

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
That's one opinion. We do need commentaries and such to help us learn. If you disagree stop going to church.

Scripture is Our Lord's Word. Commentaries are simply man's opinions about Scripture. Which is to be preferred: to rely upon Our Lord's Word, or to rely on what a mortal thinks of it?
 

evangelist6589

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
He's just saying that if you can't learn from a teacher who has put his teachings on the printed page (or ebook), then why bother with a teacher who puts his teaching in the spoken forum?

And people... Sola Scriptura does not mean that we only use the Bible. It means that it is the sole source for our faith and practice. But that doesn't neglect the reality that God has equipped the church w/ teachers to help us understand the Bible better.


Well said Greek Tim well said. I am gonna get back to reading NT Wright one of these days.
 

Yeshua1

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
He's just saying that if you can't learn from a teacher who has put his teachings on the printed page (or ebook), then why bother with a teacher who puts his teaching in the spoken forum?

And people... Sola Scriptura does not mean that we only use the Bible. It means that it is the sole source for our faith and practice. But that doesn't neglect the reality that God has equipped the church w/ teachers to help us understand the Bible better.

Correct!
The Bible is the ONLY inspired and infallible source text for us to get all practices and doctrines from, but we can also learn how to understand what it teaches to us by using gifted people in the pulpit, and on DVD, and in the printed and electronic pages!

We need to read and use other texts, such as a good bible dictionary/concordance/commentary, but never at the expense of citing what they sais before or in the place of the bible itself!

we all can be guilty of that...
 
Top