Pastor KevinR
New Member
GG- I respect my elders!Originally posted by GrannyGumbo:
Mock-on, boys!I believe what I've trusted in for more-years-than-you-are-old, to be the "final frontier"...
Sorry if I've ruffled your feathers.![]()
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
GG- I respect my elders!Originally posted by GrannyGumbo:
Mock-on, boys!I believe what I've trusted in for more-years-than-you-are-old, to be the "final frontier"...
Sorry if I've ruffled your feathers.![]()
No offense intended, but it gets tiresome to have "Yea, hath God said...?" quoted at us time and time again, as if we've never heard it before, or as if we're complete simpletons who can't tell the difference between a demon and a shoehorn. I don't mind you voicing your opinion, but stop making it sound like we're spiritual idiots.Originally posted by GrannyGumbo:
Mock-on, boys!![]()
And I trust in what has existed for over 1,600 more years than the KJV has existed. You're older than me, sure - but compared to the age of *scripture*, both you and the KJV are spring chickens.I believe what I've trusted in for more-years-than-you-are-old, to be the "final frontier"...
What's good for the gander is good for the goose.Sorry if I've ruffled your feathers.![]()
Old? The KJV covers less than 20% of church history. You don't prefer the "old" paths - look at the bigger picture. If you want to argue "older is better", then let's really open it up.Originally posted by GrannyGumbo:
Let's just say I prefer the old paths, where is the good way,'K?![]()
As far as what these young whipper-snappers know today, it puts me in mind of my dogs out back...the pup barks at nothing, the young dog barks at everything, but when that old one barks, there is a reason!
Ladies and gentlemen, there we have it. There was no Bible that one could hold in one's hand in 1605 and say "this is 'the word of God'". Passages that talk of "preservation", since they meant "bits and pieces" in 1605 but "the KJV Bible" in 1615, changed meaning in 1611. Verily, QuickeningSpirit hath spoken, with divine knowledge from beyond.The KJB is the completion of God's Word in the Canon. Every version prior was incomplete and formed from bits and pieces.
Hebrews 4:12 "For the word of God is quick, and powerful, and sharper than any twoedged sword, piercing even to the dividing asunder of soul and spirit, and of the joints and marrow, and is a discerner of the thoughts and intents of the heart."I already said I don't mind her stating her opinion, but she consistently uses her "straight stick" to bonk everyone else on the head. I think it is FANTASTIC that she has a straight stick and that she clings to it. I just wish she would watch where she's swinging it.
Yes, I agree the KJV is that. However, KJV-onlyism is NOT.Originally posted by Anti-Alexandrian:
Hebrews 4:12 "For the word of God is quick, and powerful, and sharper than any twoedged sword, piercing even to the dividing asunder of soul and spirit, and of the joints and marrow, and is a discerner of the thoughts and intents of the heart."
Because that "word" is the most disliked book in the world!Still why do you assert that this "word" is the KJV? This verse does not bolster your position.
You are somewhat on the verge of being past that. You substitute "intellectual pursuits" for common decency. Now that reaks of carnal behaviour.Being a Christian does not mean abandoning intellectual pursuits!
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Because that "word" is the most disliked book in the world! </font>[/QUOTE]If they might receive this simple reasoning, they also would be converted to the Truth.Originally posted by Anti-Alexandrian:
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr /> Still why do you assert that this "word" is the KJV? This verse does not bolster your position.
That's right "KJV-onlyism" doesn't even exist, except in the dilluded minds of those opposed to the King James Bible!Yes, I agree the KJV is that. However, KJV-onlyism is NOT.
James 1:22 says, "But be ye doers of the word, and not hearers only, deceiving your own selves."Originally posted by QuickeningSpirit:
Guys, I read all your posts to GrannyGumbo.
I think you need to know that to all who view, that you look too much like a pack of wolves than harmless sheep. Goats constantly "butting" heads.
If your "arguement" for MV's was substanciated, and it's not, you disqualify yourselves in the sight of everyone as rational, God-fearing, sensible, human beings.
The lady uses plain old common sense and yall have attacked her, insulted her integrity, and in the same process made yourselves to look like fools, instead of the "wise" you'd like yourselves to be portrayed.
If I saw a flock of sheep attacking a ravening wolf, I would more likely run to the defense of the wolf, but now I am running to the defense of a sheep from wolves and goats: Leave her alone, she is a bit more wise than you'll ever understand.
If you would lay down your "degrees" in Bible history and observe the obvious, you will see that your banter is more divisive than what you accuse.
It's no wonder the church and the world are in the shape they're in, no body stands for anything any more. If they do, they are attack with the liberal banter just like I've seen here, declaring themselves as wise, and degrading everything their predecessors stand for. It's the same practiced in politics by liberal, bed-wetting democrats, thank God for democrats like Zell Miller who has enough sense to see what's wrong with his own party!! (That froma staunch KJB, sin hating, sinner loving, respectful Republican!)
Well, bigboys, your ways aint workin'!
Each rendition you come up with compared to the other has discrepencies, that confuses, then when you attack the KJB for what you believe to be error just adds to the confusion.
As you get "older", wiser, more mature, you be blessed to realize just how dumb your agenda was all along.
We have a real treasure in our elderly, and it would do you real good to pay attention when they speak.
She said she sticks with what she knows works, you or anybody else can't say that in regards to MV's. That's why the "quest" for something "new".
The insane remark the KJB was an "MV" in it's time proves your lack of wisdom.
The KJB is the completion of God's Word in the Canon. Every version prior was incomplete and formed from bits and pieces.
I must commend your abilities to twist everything anyone says into a mockery in the attempt to justify your means, but one thing for certain, is that you have made yourselves look ridiculous.
I'll leave you now with the following three verses and get back to my rest in the Word of God, infallable, inerrant, inspired; the King James Bible:
Psalms 36:3 The words of his mouth are iniquity and deceit: he hath left off to be wise, and to do good.
Romans 1:22 Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools,
1 Corinthians 3:18 Let no man deceive himself. If any man among you seemeth to be wise in this world, let him become a fool, that he may be wise.
![]()
Because that "word" is the most disliked book in the world! </font>[/QUOTE]Is it?Originally posted by Anti-Alexandrian:
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr /> Still why do you assert that this "word" is the KJV? This verse does not bolster your position.