glad4mercy
Active Member
Early in my Christian walk, I understood being drawn to Jesus by the Father as the Grace of God preceding out faith, and then regeneration was the New Birth that logically, not temporally followed our faith. But I understood my faith and my regeration as having occurred similtaneously.
So hearing, drawn, followed by regeneration/faith.
Through listening to and reading people of different persuasions, including Calvinists, and MORE importantly, through growth in reading the scriptures, I came to understand regeneration better.
I now understand regeneration to be the monergistic act of God in which the spiritually dead believer is raised to life by the Power of God ALONE by the means or agency of faith through hearing the Word of God.
Is this what Calvinism teaches?
Secondly, how do Calvinists differentiate between "drawing" and "regeneration"?
I was on another message board recently, and I was attacked rigorously and abusively for my view on regeneration and preservation/perserverance by OSAS Arminians, who believed in preservation, but rejected perserverance of the saints, which I hold.
So hearing, drawn, followed by regeneration/faith.
Through listening to and reading people of different persuasions, including Calvinists, and MORE importantly, through growth in reading the scriptures, I came to understand regeneration better.
I now understand regeneration to be the monergistic act of God in which the spiritually dead believer is raised to life by the Power of God ALONE by the means or agency of faith through hearing the Word of God.
Is this what Calvinism teaches?
Secondly, how do Calvinists differentiate between "drawing" and "regeneration"?
I was on another message board recently, and I was attacked rigorously and abusively for my view on regeneration and preservation/perserverance by OSAS Arminians, who believed in preservation, but rejected perserverance of the saints, which I hold.
Last edited: