Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Prodigal Son anyone?
...or does that scripture not count?
Prodigal Son anyone?
...or does that scripture not count?
Do you have scripture to back that? With your words, you have stripped
the salvation from everyone I have ever known in my entire 59 years of life. And don't just quote one verse out of context. That's what cults do all the time.
I don't buy it.
Peter's denial was not a practice. It was a one time thing. He never left the Lord he just sinned a sin.Jesus Himself predicted that Peter and ALL of the Apostles would leave Him,,,
Were they saved?
Both Peter/Judas betrayed/denied the Lord, peter shows that a true Christian will come back to the Lord eventually" godly repentance", while "professing" one will not come back "world sorrow"
Go back and read my posts.Do you mean this to say that no true Christian sins?
.Can we not learn a lesson from Israel? How many times did Israel turn it's back on God? Too many to count. And yet God always took them back if they repented and asked forgiveness. And they turned away from God for many years at a time. Remember the 70 years they spent captive in Babylon because they refused to obey the sabbath? Yet God did not abandon them and they were always loved by God. Why is it any different for a Christian?
The prodigal son was lost. Read the passage! :BangHead:Prodigal Son anyone?
...or does that scripture not count?
No Christian needs to return to God as they never leave.
Do you mean this to say that no true Christian sins?
Go back and read my posts.
I have. Yes or no, do you mean to say in your first statement (above) that no true Christian sins? I only ask in the interest of clarity.
Read my posts.
.Hmm... You make a statement. I ask an honest yes/no question to better understand what you are saying. You sidestep with "Read my posts". Generally, people who are making a serious attempt to put forth their views are willing to explain them if a question is asked.
I don't think you are serious. That or you don't know what you're talking about.
.
I don't think you are serious if you do nto want to read what I already wrote.
I have. At times I am curious and ask for further explanation, yet you refuse to oblige. Apparently, the same will hold true in this case as well. I regret that.
A yes or no answer would have helped.
Those who wish to teach should be willing to explain their points.
Peter's denial was not a practice. It was a one time thing. He never left the Lord he just sinned a sin.
I believe it WAS a practice. It was not a one time thing but a three time thing.
Jesus Himself predicted that Peter and ALL of the Apostles would leave Him,,,
Were they saved?
Both Peter/Judas betrayed/denied the Lord, peter shows that a true Christian will come back to the Lord eventually" godly repentance", while "professing" one will not come back "world sorrow"
I believe it WAS a practice. It was not a one time thing but a three time thing.
Again, we see the difficulty in determining what it means to "practice" sin.
I don't think anyone here is saying they disagree with the oft-quoted verse. We simply cannot agree on what exactly "practice sin" means. I think we all have also agreed that it does not mean a christian "cannot sin." (which is a quite difficult conclusion to come to since the text actually says "cannot sin." ...but the rest of scripture demands it.)