Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Tim & others, you may find this interesting:I find it very hard to believe that the OT Law will be reinstituted in the future,
http://www.israelnationalnews.com/news.php3?id=70349Sanhedrin Launched In Tiberias
12:19 Jan 20, '05 / 10 Shevat 5765
A unique ceremony - probably only the 2nd of its kind in the past 1,600 years - took place in Tiberias today: The launching of a Sanhedrin, the highest Jewish-legal tribunal in the Land of Israel.
A unique ceremony - probably only the second of its kind in the past 1,600 years - is taking place in Tiberias today: The launching of a Sanhedrin, the highest Jewish-legal tribunal in the Land of Israel.
Source </font>[/QUOTE]LadyEagle--Originally posted by LadyEagle:
Enlighten us, then, Natters, and please provide sources to back up your opinion - thanks.
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />
Replacement Theology was introduced to the Church shortly after Gentile leadership took over from Jewish leadership. What are its premises?
Israel (the Jewish people and the land) has been replaced by the Christian Church in the purposes of God, or, more precisely, the Church is the historic continuation of Israel to the exclusion of the former.
The Jewish people are now no longer a "chosen people." In fact, they are no different from any other group, such as the English, Spanish, or Africans.
Apart from repentance, the new birth, and incorporation into the Church, the Jewish people have no future, no hope, and no calling in the plan of God. The same is true for every other nation and group.
Since Pentecost of Acts 2, the term "Israel," as found in the Bible, now refers to the Church.
The promises, covenants and blessings ascribed to Israel in the Bible have been taken away from the Jews and given to the Church, which has superseded them. However, the Jews are subject to the curses found in the Bible, as a result of their rejection of Christ.
JGrubbs--Originally posted by JGrubbs
LE, to be fair your post defining "Replacement Theology" is from Clarence H. Wagner, Jr. who is against "Replacement Theology", in order to have a fair debate you must hear from both sides of the argument, so hear is Answering the "Replacement Theology" Critics by Gary DeMar:
http://www.americanvision.org/articlearchive/10-07-05.asp
As Jesus Christ said [Matthew 22:29] Ye do err, not knowing the scriptures, nor the power of God.Originally posted by Linda64:
Here is a challenge to all you Replacement Theologists: When you read Paul's epistle to the Romans, chapter 10 vs. 1 Brethren, my heart's desire and prayer to God for Israel is, that they might be saved. (Romans 10:1)--where it says "Israel", put the word "church" in its place (since you believe that the Church has replaced Israel). Brethren, my heart's desire and prayer to God for the church (replacing Israel) is, that they might be saved. (Romans 10:1)
Sounds pretty silly, doesn't it?
Ah! The errors of dispensationalism!Originally posted by Linda64:
What is Replacement Theology?
Replacement Theology was introduced to the Church shortly after Gentile leadership took over from Jewish leadership. What are its premises?
1. Israel (the Jewish people and the land) has been replaced by the Christian Church in the purposes of God, or, more precisely, the Church is the historic continuation of Israel to the exclusion of the former. 2. The Jewish people are now no longer a “chosen people.” In fact, they are no different from any other group, such as the English, Spanish, or Africans. 3. Apart from repentance, the new birth, and incorporation into the Church, the Jewish people have no future, no hope, and no calling in the plan of God. The same is true for every other nation and group. 4. Since Pentecost of Acts 2, the term “Israel,” as found in the Bible, now refers to the Church. 5. The promises, covenants and blessings ascribed to Israel in the Bible have been taken away from the Jews and given to the Church, which has superseded them. However, the Jews are subject to the curses found in the Bible, as a result of their rejection of Christ. If you hear a Christian, a minister, or a Church doctrine that ascribes to one of these points, then knowingly or unknowingly they have swallowed the Replacement Theology pill. I say unknowingly because the doctrine is so systemic, most Christians have been brought up in it and hove no idea that these premises are contrary to Scripture.
http://www.bridgesforpeace.com/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=1914
The church was not a continuation of Spiritual Israel. The church is a totally separate entity. God set Israel aside and is now calling out out a people (Jews and Gentiles)--He will fulfill His promises to Israel "when the fullness of the Gentiles has come in"-- For I would not, brethren, that ye should be ignorant of this mystery, lest ye should be wise in your own conceits; that blindness in part is happened to Israel, until the fulness of the Gentiles be come in. (Romans 11:25) which is when He comes in the clouds at the Rapture of the Church.
Sorry, OldRegular, but dispensational theology is not error--only when it is the error of Bullingerism or Cornelius StammOriginally posted by OldRegular:
Ah! The errors of dispensationalism!![]()
![]()
![]()
Sorry, OldRegular, but dispensational theology is not error--only when it is the error of Bullingerism or Cornelius Stamm </font>[/QUOTE]Or Darby, or Scofield, or Chafer, or Ironside, or Pentecost, or Walvoord, or Ryrie, or ?????????????Originally posted by Linda64:
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by OldRegular:
Ah! The errors of dispensationalism!![]()
![]()
![]()
Sorry, OldRegular, but dispensational theology is not error--only when it is the error of Bullingerism or Cornelius Stamm </font>[/QUOTE]Or Darby, or Scofield, or Chafer, or Ironside, or Pentecost, or Walvoord, or Ryrie, or ????????????? </font>[/QUOTE]Replacement theology has its roots in the Roman Catholic Church (Augustinianism). It is theologically anti-semetic. Seems you, RTs want the blessings of Israel's covenants but none of the curses? HmmmmmmmmOriginally posted by OldRegular:
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by Linda64:
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by OldRegular:
Ah! The errors of dispensationalism!![]()
![]()
![]()
Sorry, OldRegular, but dispensational theology is not error--only when it is the error of Bullingerism or Cornelius Stamm </font>[/QUOTE]Or Darby, or Scofield, or Chafer, or Ironside, or Pentecost, or Walvoord, or Ryrie, or ????????????? </font>[/QUOTE]Replacement theology has its roots in the Roman Catholic Church (Augustinianism). It is theologically anti-semetic. Seems you, RTs want the blessings of Israel's covenants but none of the curses? HmmmmmmmmOriginally posted by Linda64:
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by OldRegular:
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by Linda64:
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by OldRegular:
Ah! The errors of dispensationalism!![]()
![]()
![]()
You confuse the nation Israel with spiritual Israel, the believing remnant.Originally posted by Linda64:
Jesus Christ did not fail in His mission. God made specific covenants with the nation of Israel that are "everlasting" covenants. God does not break His Word, and He certainly has not forsaken His people whom He foreknew.