Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
I've never put anyone on ignore, other than just actually ignoring them
I've never put anyone on ignore, other than just actually ignoring them
The 'synergist' definition very concisely strikes to the core of the matter and for that reason alone most won't admit to being synergists.
and the insertion of the buzz-word "work" is all that is necessary for the monergist to begin accusing the synergist of "works salvation". When Synergists begin to feel that those who disagree with them treat their viewpoint more fairly....more will be willing to respond. No "synergist" believes that the "work" of regeneration is any other than God's alone. They believe that the "work" of regeneration will only be accomplished by God (and God alone) in accordance with Human will."in the work of regeneration."
For those who have the ability to attend another church but don't, I'm curious as to why you remain where you are. Why do you attend a church in which you disagree with the majority on how salvation works. Not judging anybody, just curious.
Would say a majority of our members would not know what either term means!
I've never put anyone on ignore, other than just actually ignoring them
The 'synergist' definition very concisely strikes to the core of the matter and for that reason alone most won't admit to being synergists.
True...also hard to delineate what it means when one side of the argument insists on defining all terms on their own and only arguing based upon those definitions though.
For examples?
The 'synergist' definition very concisely strikes to the core of the matter and for that reason alone most won't admit to being synergists.
Hmm... I fail to see why a "synergist" would refuse to admit to it. To date...two synergists have done so, and admitted as much. Thus far, two "synergists" have admitted to being, in fact, "synergists". I am a "synergist". There is no reason to deny so.
Unless they fear that the term itself has already become some form of "cuss word".
Guilty, I am a synergist.
Sure they would! I would think they all would and so far I think that all that have identified in the poll as such have. Is there a such thing as a synergistic calvinist? Is there such a thing as a monergistic non-calvinist? (...yeah, the terms are used loosely but I hope you get my point...)
Browse the link provided in post #2 and note the 'resistance' many have to admitting their belief that they cooperated with the 'birth from above'. That poll showed 36% synergists, 64% monergists; you think that's an accurate representation of the makeup on the BB? I don't, I believe if the numbers were reversed it would be a more accurate representation.