• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

RESPECT

Salty

20,000 Posts Club
Administrator
(Note: - this thread is being posted by me as a BB member - not as an Admin)

I have stated that we should show respect to others - ie not using slang names such as tRump, ect.

But my post is not about showing respect to an individual.

Often we are told we are to respect other religions. Well, it seems like a nice statement, whether it is PC or not.

Here is my thinking: - I do not respect the religion of Mormons, JW, RCC, Mulsims, and ect.
But I do respect the RIGHT of a person to believe and/or practice their religion - for the most part. (for example if a religion believe that a human baby needs to be physically sacrificed - that would have to be prevented)

I may not like the fact that the RCC will only sprinkle a candidate (even adults)
Thus I do not respect the fact that they do sprinkle. But I will respect their right to do so.

So a question- for this particular instance - if invited, would you attend the sprinkling ceremony for a new born baby? I would say- Thank you- but tactfully decline the invitation.

Do you think we overuse the word "Respect"? Do we try to be "neutral" by saying that we personally would not (fill in the blank)

If something is wrong - why do we think we must be part of it?


Do we know when to stand up for the truth? Are we willing to stand up for the Truth? IF the other party says they respect our right to believe different - then they should be willing to understand why we can not participate in such activities.

Lets take this to a different example: I would politely decline an invitation to a h0nosexu@l "wedding"
IF asked why we refused - what would we say- do we know what we would say.
We often know what we believe - but we may not know WHY we believe it.

Some would say that by doing so we must be guilty of h0mophobia. If that came up, I would first ask what is the definition of h0mophobia? Mr. Webster say: "irrational fear of, aversion to, or discrimination against h0mosexu@ls" I would let them know that I do not have an irrational fear - but I cannot condone such actions, is it is immoral (probably would not say sin)

Now, how about a vegetarian ? Can I respect that belief?
In a strict sense - No, I do not respect that belief. But I can easily respect your right to be one.


What Mr. Webster says about respect:
3a: high or special regard : ESTEEM
b: the quality or state of being esteemed
respects plural : expressions of high or special regard


So what are your thoughts about respect?
 
Last edited:

atpollard

Well-Known Member
Here is my thinking: - I do not respect the religion of Mormons, JW, RCC, Mulsims, and ect.
But I do respect the RIGHT of a person to believe and/or practice their religion - for the most part. (for example if a religion believe that a human baby needs to be physically sacrificed - that would have to be prevented)
An argument could be made that by respecting “the RIGHT of a person to believe and/or practice their religion”, we are actually affirming a religion that believes a human baby needs to be sacrificed. The respect for the Mormon practicing his belief, allows him to train up others to worship a god other than the Father of Jesus Christ, thus perpetuating the ongoing human sacrifice. Same fit JW and Muslims. (I will leave it to others an God to speak on the RCC).

My wife and I were discussing those annoying sales calls today. We came to the realization that it was actually an opportunity to become missionaries to India. Think about it. We don’t even need to leave our home, but some anonymous company will pay strangers in India to call us so we can tell them about Jesus. I am almost looking to the next call about my credit card.
 

Van

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Yes, I think those on the left who advocate "respect" for non-Christian religions are really pushing polytheism, and thus are using a Trojan Horse to attack Christianity and the bible, which teaches freedom is better than slavery. Our right of freedom of association is being attacked just as surely as our second amendment. I have no problem with one of my doctors who is Jewish, or one of my car mechanics who is mid-eastern, but my social circle is within my church attenders.

I think it is likely I will not live to see the day, I become a slave of the state. But a majority of the voters seem to be willing to become slaves. The opposite of biblical teaching.
 

Salty

20,000 Posts Club
Administrator
... I have no problem with one of my doctors who is Jewish, or one of my car mechanics who is mid-eastern, but my social circle is within my church attenders. ....

Actually, we should put them into our circle of friends - As I am a believer of Friendship evangelism. Limiting your circle to just church members -.......
 

tyndale1946

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Actually, we should put them into our circle of friends - As I am a believer of Friendship evangelism. Limiting your circle to just church members -.......

R RECOGNIZE the inherent worth of all human beings.

E ELIMINATE derogatory words and phrases from your vocabulary.

S SPEAK with people – not at them…or about them.

P PRACTICE empathy. Walk awhile in others’ shoes.

E EARN respect from others through respect-worthy behaviors.

C CONSIDER others’ feelings before speaking and acting.

T TREAT everyone with dignity and courtesy.

I don't always own it or practice it but we all should strive to press toward the mark of the high calling in Christ!... Brother Glen:)
 

Salty

20,000 Posts Club
Administrator
By doing so - you never know when you might make a great new friend

Or more importantly - meet someone who needs a friend.
 

Van

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Actually, we should put them into our circle of friends - As I am a believer of Friendship evangelism. Limiting your circle to just church members -.......
Just one tiny problem, we are in the world, but not of the world, and friendship with the world is... James 4:4

It is like the difference between "agapao" love for the lost and "philadelphos" (love of fellow Christians). 1 Peter 3:8
 

Roy

<img src=/0710.gif>
Site Supporter
In this country - we have freedom of religion
We certainly have freedom of religion, but I can't help but wonder if the drafters of the U.S. Constitution felt that freedom of religion was freedom to worship Jesus as we see fit and not acceptance of all non-Christian faiths.
In one early writing that I heard of, the author referred to non-Christian faiths as "heathen practices" and not religion. I personally don't think that the founders were open and accepting of religions other than the Christian religion.
 

JonC

Moderator
Moderator
ALL "religions, faiths, ways" other than Jesus Christ IS from the devil himself! To allow people "freedom" to practice their "religion", etc, is to encourage devil worship! simple.
I think he may be pointing out that Christians fled England to escape religious persecution.
 

JonC

Moderator
Moderator
where? I don't see this said anywhere
Just thinking that may be the reason for his post (that England persecuted Catholics and "non-conforming" Christians like Puritan, Quakers, Mennonites, etc ).

I don't know that is the reason for his reply, but it would have been the reason had I posted the comments. England was far from a nation of religious tolerance.
 

Earth Wind and Fire

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Just thinking that may be the reason for his post (that England persecuted Catholics and "non-conforming" Christians like Puritan, Quakers, Mennonites, etc ).

I don't know that is the reason for his reply, but it would have been the reason had I posted the comments. England was far from a nation of religious tolerance.
In GB you had the established church (Anglican w/the king or Queen at the head) and then everyone else (the non-conformists) who were considered by the establishment to be 2nd class rabble, not posh and not elite like the Anglican’s.
 
Last edited:
Top