Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
There are.Now if only they were telling the truth.
Come on, quit posturing and post something of substance in response to the obvious contradiction between Ambrose's writings and Wylie's conclusions.Rome of course say they arent. The problem is that Rome is utterly devoid of credibility.
Absolutly."Wow...just as "scholory"(sic)...and "trustworthy" as the one you posted??"
"You mean the kind with extensive footnotes but which mischaracterize the primary sources?"
file:///c:/FundamentalBaptistLibrary2000/WWW/qindex.htmIt is estimated that at the opening of this century, from two to three hundred Churches had been gathered, some of them thousands of miles apart. When the Apostles died, their authority died with them and they lived only in their writings. Their office did not allow of perpetuation, for they were the chosen witnesses of Christ’s life and work, and could not bequeath their oral testimony to others. When these orphaned flocks were left alone in all their humanness, their only directory was the Book by which the Apostles had transmitted their witness and revelations, under the infallible inspiration of the Holy Spirit. No miraculous agency was needed to supplement their writings, and the Awful Volume finished, their twelve thrones were left vacant. Woe to him who makes the Bible a footstool to climb into their empty seats. For the first time man was left on common ground, with the choice of making the unmixed authority of that book his guide to Christ, or of committing his soul to the lead of uninspired men. This fact alone put the Gospel to its severest test, and made the second century a most solemn period, as Christians had no alternative but to follow the New Book. How, then, did they bear themselves toward the Sacred Oracles?
Eusebius says, that they ‘Vied with each other in the preaching of Christ, and in the distribution of the Scriptures.’ The Epistle to the Thessalonians was written about twenty years after the crucifixion, and the last of the New Covenant books within fifty years thereafter. Probably Paul’s Epistles were first collected into one volume; but within half a century after the death of John, the four Gospels were publicly read in the Churches of Syria, Asia Minor, Italy and Gaul, and all the New Testament books were collected about A.D. 150. The first translation appears to have been the Syriac, called Peshito (literal), for its fidelity, rendered most faithfully into the common language of the Holy Land. Some think that our Lord’s exact language is better preserved in this version than in the Greek manuscripts themselves. J. Winchelaus, who devoted much research to its history, says that it preserves the letter of sacred Scripture truly, and Michaelis pronounces it ‘The very best translation of the New Testament that I have ever read.’
The Peshito throws a strong light upon the act of baptism in that age. The word which expresses that act is amad, which the Syriac lexicons define by ‘immerse.’ Bernstein uses these words: ‘He was dipped, immersed: he dipped or plunged himself into something.’ Michaelis declares, that this is the Syriac word which Jesus would use for baptism, in the vernacular language which he spoke. This version was read in the Christian assemblies, with the originals, and where they could not be understood by the people, interpreters rendered them into their mother tongue on the spot. In this age a Latin version was also made, which came into general use immediately. Woide ascribes the translation of the Sahidic, the dialect of Upper Egypt. and the Coptic, that of Lower Egypt, to this period. In the Latin, the word taptizn was rendered by the word tingo, to dip, or immerse; in the Sahidic it was transferred, evidently, because as a Greek term it was well understood in Upper Egypt; and in the Coptic it was translated by the word amas, to immerse or plunge. Latin versions were soon multiplied. Augustine says: ‘Those who have translated the Bible into Greek can be numbered, but not so the Latin versions; for in the first ages of the Church, whoever got hold of a Greek Codex, ventured to translate it into Latin.’ He also decides that the ancient Italic is the most literal of the Latin versions. Irenaeus, too, speaks of many barbarous tribes who had ‘salvation in their heart--without ink or paper;’ alluding to the fact that the unlearned heard the Scripture read in their own tongue in the public assemblies.
These early Baptists decided all questions of doctrine by an appeal to their Sacred Books; being very jealous of forged books, which abounded very early. Tertullian tells us where some of the inspired autographs could be found at that time. ‘The very images,’ he says, ‘of their voice and person are now recited and exhibited. Do you live in Achaia? There is Corinth. Are you not far from Macedonia? You have Philippi and Thessalonica. Are you nigh unto Asia? There is Ephesus. Or, if you border upon Italy, there is Rome.’ And as late as the fourth century, Peter of Alexandria said that the Gospel of John, written with his own hand, was still preserved and venerated in the Church at Ephesus.
("A History of the Baptists," Thomas Armitage)
"Say ANYTHING....divert...slander...change the subject, attack the person"...Originally posted by D28guy:
I love you guys, I really do. But sometimes Catholic apologists just crack me up.
.......
"Say ANYTHING, do ANYTHING, divert, attempt to confuse, slander, change the subject, attack the person, etc etc etc."
Absolutly.Originally posted by D28guy:
Doubting Thomas,
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />"Wow...just as "scholory"(sic)...and "trustworthy" as the one you posted??"
"You mean the kind with extensive footnotes but which mischaracterize the primary sources?"
I don't think anyone is claiming that Rome is spotless or without blemish but the fact remains that they are not the "harlot" church many make her out to be.Originally posted by D28guy:
And I guess that those with "objective glasses" are the ones who buy...blindly...the utter nonsense and dishonest lies that Romes "spin meisters" so cunningly decieve its victims with?
The most objective people on the face of this planet are people who turn to the scriptures alone as their truth standard, use that truth standard as a guide to judge all *supposed* christian groups and teachings, and condemn that which contradicts in foundational areas...as Rome does in abundance.
3-BABYLONI don't think anyone is claiming that Rome is spotless or without blemish but the fact remains that they are not the "harlot" church many make her out to be.
"Many waters" of course referes to the fact that the organisation in question is not in any sense "regional". It is world wide in its scope and influence.Then one of the seven angels who had the seven bowls came and talked with me, saying to me,* "Come, I will show you the judgment of the great harlot who sits on many waters,..."
It goes without saying that Rome has always been, and still is, interested in political influence as "she" seeks the blessings of political leaders world wide, and seeks to use "her" connections for "her" gain. It started when Constantine and its never ended. We've all seen the photos, and read the information, of "her" even giving her blessing to Hitler....with whom the kings of the earth committed fornication, and the inhabitants of the earth were made drunk with the wine of her fornication.
Purple and scarlet are very prominant in the church of Rome, and I've heard it said that they are...if not literally...the "unofficial" colors of the church.So he carried me away in the Spirit into the wilderness. And I saw a woman sitting on a scarlet beast which was full of names of blasphemy, having seven heads and ten horns.
The woman was arrayed in purple and scarlet,..."
And of course all one has to do is visit the Vatican and see the incredible wealth that is there with all the excess of golden items and buildings, etc. Not just in Rome of course but world wide. An incredible amount of wealth that "she" sits upon and flaunts before the world. People travel land and sea century after century to gawk at the excess of wealth on display....and adorned with gold and precious stones and pearls, having in her hand a golden cup full of abominations and the filthiness of her fornication.
Sadly, it goes without saying that Rome is the undisputed world wide leader regarding the amount of precious children of God whom she has tortured and murdered. The crusades. The inquisitians. The stake burning. The torture chambers.And on her forehead a name was written: MYSTERY, BABYLON THE GREAT, THE MOTHER OF HARLOTS AND OF THE ABOMINATIONS OF THE EARTH.
I saw the woman, drunk with the blood of the saints and with the blood of the martyrs of Jesus. And when I saw her, I marveled with great amazement.
Rome...of course...is known as the "city on seven hills"."But the angel said to me, "Why did you marvel? I will tell you the mystery of the woman and of the beast that carries her, which has the seven heads and the ten horns.
The beast that you saw was, and is not, and will ascend out of the bottomless pit and go to perdition. And those who dwell on the earth will marvel, whose names are not written in the Book of Life from the foundation of the world, when they see the beast that was, and is not, and yet is.
Here is the mind which has wisdom: The seven heads are seven mountains on which the woman sits.
I am precisly aware of what has been going on. Its a consistant practice that has been going on for the over 20 years that I have been born again and have been routinely sharing with Catholics."Mike, you obviously didn't understand what was requested of you."
Regurgitating Hunt again D28guy? When are you going to learn to think for yourself and actually study and look at all views and then come to an informative decision? I myself was guilty for a long time, but I guess you can say I was once blind, but now see.Originally posted by D28guy:
Well, there seems to be a lot of "Catholic Church is the Harlot in revelation" stuff showing up on this and other threads.
I'm not an expert on end time events like some are, but its part of Gods truth standard and written wisdom so its worth dwelling upon.
I personally think there is something to the vew that the great harlot is the false christian based in Rome. There sure are some pretty clear "signs" going on here...
Empty and vain conspiracy theories, you can not make an assertion without proof.Mike has been telling the Truth, which I am glad about.
The Great Harlot is gearing up to strike the final blow against True Believers.
There are pleny of evidences which prove this Harlot is sitting on the Seven Hills in Rome as she did these things torturing and killing the Believers:
http://www.cuttingedge.org/news/n1676.cfm
http://www.compusmart.ab.ca/rprince/murders.htm
http://www.askwhy.co.uk/christianity/0811Inquisition.html
http://www.globalpolicy.org/intljustice/tribunals/2001/0716rwnd.htm
http://www.lietuvos.net/istorija/katalikai/
All the heresies that she keeps proves that she is the Great Harlot!
At least, you are wrong ! because I am here in addition to Mike !Originally posted by Chemnitz:
The only person on this thread who has engaged in such is you Mike. [/QB]
Now where is the proof of this assertion. Well there isn't any but that has never stopped these people.A concrete proof of this fact is that Pope Paul VI (1963-1978) restored the Office of the Inquisition, renamed today as the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith frome cuttingedge.org
"Many waters" of course referes to the fact that the organisation in question is not in any sense "regional". It is world wide in its scope and influence.Originally posted by D28guy:
Well, there seems to be a lot of "Catholic Church is the Harlot in revelation" stuff showing up on this and other threads.
I'm not an expert on end time events like some are, but its part of Gods truth standard and written wisdom so its worth dwelling upon.
I personally think there is something to the vew that the great harlot is the false christian based in Rome. There sure are some pretty clear "signs" going on here...
Revelation 17:1-9...
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Then one of the seven angels who had the seven bowls came and talked with me, saying to me,* "Come, I will show you the judgment of the great harlot who sits on many waters,..."
It goes without saying that Rome has always been, and still is, interested in political influence as "she" seeks the blessings of political leaders world wide, and seeks to use "her" connections for "her" gain. It started when Constantine and its never ended. We've all seen the photos, and read the information, of "her" even giving her blessing to Hitler....with whom the kings of the earth committed fornication, and the inhabitants of the earth were made drunk with the wine of her fornication.
Purple and scarlet are very prominant in the church of Rome, and I've heard it said that they are...if not literally...the "unofficial" colors of the church.So he carried me away in the Spirit into the wilderness. And I saw a woman sitting on a scarlet beast which was full of names of blasphemy, having seven heads and ten horns.
The woman was arrayed in purple and scarlet,..."
And of course all one has to do is visit the Vatican and see the incredible wealth that is there with all the excess of golden items and buildings, etc. Not just in Rome of course but world wide. An incredible amount of wealth that "she" sits upon and flaunts before the world. People travel land and sea century after century to gawk at the excess of wealth on display....and adorned with gold and precious stones and pearls, having in her hand a golden cup full of abominations and the filthiness of her fornication.
Sadly, it goes without saying that Rome is the undisputed world wide leader regarding the amount of precious children of God whom she has tortured and murdered. The crusades. The inquisitians. The stake burning. The torture chambers.And on her forehead a name was written: MYSTERY, BABYLON THE GREAT, THE MOTHER OF HARLOTS AND OF THE ABOMINATIONS OF THE EARTH.
I saw the woman, drunk with the blood of the saints and with the blood of the martyrs of Jesus. And when I saw her, I marveled with great amazement.
Rome...of course...is known as the "city on seven hills"."But the angel said to me, "Why did you marvel? I will tell you the mystery of the woman and of the beast that carries her, which has the seven heads and the ten horns.
The beast that you saw was, and is not, and will ascend out of the bottomless pit and go to perdition. And those who dwell on the earth will marvel, whose names are not written in the Book of Life from the foundation of the world, when they see the beast that was, and is not, and yet is.
Here is the mind which has wisdom: The seven heads are seven mountains on which the woman sits.