• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Romney round two

Salty

20,000 Posts Club
Administrator
Those things will be forgotten--they were his salad days. Look at 0bam@--if his teleprompter breaks, he can't even say hello. ...
First sentence referring to Gov Perry.

You must keep one thing in mind. Those "rules" only apply to Republicans. Dems are given a free pass.
 

Earth Wind and Fire

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
:thumbsup:





No, EWF. You still can't have him. :laugh:

The USA needs him....make Alan West his running mate. Tell ya what Rolf....what if NJ gives you Christy? Be forewarned though....keep him away from public projects, bridges and donuts. (I am serious) .:BangHead:
 

church mouse guy

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Every opponent that he faces in a national election will remind the voters of it.




Yet he was reelected.



That is admirable, but will mean little in a national election.

Besides, after the Bush administration, it will likely be a long time before another Texas governor occupies the White House.

Rolf, Perry will have to campaign all out in each of the 57 states.

:laugh:
 

Rolfe

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
The USA needs him....make Alan West his running mate. Tell ya what Rolf....what if NJ gives you Christy? Be forewarned though....keep him away from public projects, bridges and donuts. (I am serious) .:BangHead:

Youse guys :)smilewinkgrin:) brought Christie upon yourselves. :tonofbricks:

I doubt that Walker will run...this time. Reasons: 1. He is only a one-term governor. I could be wrong, but I think that he would prefer another term to both solidify the state of the State and his reputation. 2. He is not as widely known as some of the other Republicans who are interested and knows that. 3. The failed recall was hard on his family. Unionista threats against them, that type of thing. His Wife and sons seem more important to him than public office. I could be wrong, but I would not be surprised if he waited until his kids are a little older.

I would not be surprised if he waits a cycle or two.
 

InTheLight

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
There is a lot of chatter that Mitt Rmoney will run for Prez again, REALLY? Is that the best the GOP can do? If he ends up being the GOP candidate, they might as well just give the Presidency to Hillary.:tonofbricks:

Who would make a good GOP Candidate?

There is no one that I know of that would be a good GOP candidate. It's going to have to be someone from out of nowhere, kind of like Jimmy Carter and Obama were for the Dems.

That said, I like Scott Walker, he's a survivor of numerous attacks on him and he keeps winning. He may be lacking in the personality and charisma department and I doubt he wants to run.

I suppose Paul Ryan would be OK.
 

righteousdude2

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Thanks!

Condi is pro-choice and therefore is disqualified. She is an expert on Russia in particular and foreign affairs worldwide but she is not a viable candidate and would cost the GOP another election. I think that she is Presbyterian USA, a liberal denomination that used to be conservative and still has some conservatives here and there.

Didn't know that ... thanks for enlightening me. How about Sarah Palin - round 2, too?
 

righteousdude2

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Maybe ....

Nothing against her personally --but it is a completely an unworkable idea. And she knows it too.

You're right ... but I think it is the time and place to have a woman VP, and it would do a lot for the GOP to not only put a good candidate in office who can right the wrong that's been done, but do it with the first female VPOTUS at his side!

Do you believe Romney could turn things around like he did in Salt Lake with the Olympics? That is realy the question!
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Earth Wind and Fire

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Youse guys :)smilewinkgrin:) brought Christie upon yourselves. :tonofbricks:
Yes....just as the nation (war weary of BUSH/CHEANY) hoisted BO upon us....wrongly thinking he and his ilk would bring about change. And that's what we got. A leftist move towards Marxism. Christy promised change too...but all we got was an extortionist.....created to grab as much as they could plunder. Both administrations perpetuated hoaxes.
I doubt that Walker will run...this time. Reasons: 1. He is only a one-term governor. I could be wrong, but I think that he would prefer another term to both solidify the state of the State and his reputation. 2. He is not as widely known as some of the other Republicans who are interested and knows that. 3. The failed recall was hard on his family. Unionista threats against them, that type of thing. His Wife and sons seem more important to him than public office. I could be wrong, but I would not be surprised if he waited until his kids are a little older.

I would not be surprised if he waits a cycle or two.

Well you have to consede that Walker did effect positive change for the taxpayers of the state of Wisconsin ....and that type of action takes a toll. I don't know the guys age....so perhaps he should take a back seat.
 

church mouse guy

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Didn't know that ... thanks for enlightening me. How about Sarah Palin - round 2, too?

She's a doll but she may have retired from running for offices. Alaska is expensive so she and her husband must spend a lot of time working for a living.

Florida is expensive, also, but it probably is nicer than California.
 

Zaac

Well-Known Member
I don't think that is true. First, it really is not a sure bet that Hilllary will run. If she does her numbers have plummeted.

Second, everything Romney predicted in the debates with Obama have come true.

Third, he is an expert at turning around failing corps. He knows money.

I believe he would be a good President.

Perhaps one of the primary reasons for Christians to vote for a man who rejects Jesus Christ is because they love money and saving the "country" more than they love seeing souls saved.
 

Zaac

Well-Known Member
The verb tense should have been that Romney would have been a good President. There is no indication that he is running. It has become clear that Mormonism cannot deliver because of their internal political divisions and the great number of people leaving Mormonism for their recent attempts to normalize the homosexuality within their ranks.

Therefore I am hoping for the nomination of a good Methodist, Texas Gov. Rick Perry, a former marine.

He does seem to be saying and doing the "right" things. He just needs to practice speaking.

Romney has said repeatedly that he isn't running for anything in 2016 so folks can stop trying to recruit him. Keep the devil's evil of Mormonism out of a position of achieving notoriety.
 

Jkdbuck76

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Perhaps one of the primary reasons for Christians to vote for a man who rejects Jesus Christ is because they love money and saving the "country" more than they love seeing souls saved.

????? So the corollary to that is "vote for Barack Hussein Obama if you love seeing souls saved?" I'm confused. Please unpack your above statement.
 

Zaac

Well-Known Member
????? So the corollary to that is "vote for Barack Hussein Obama if you love seeing souls saved?" I'm confused.

The corollary is to "vote for BHO" only if you believe you have to vote for either evil.

The only reason to vote for either is because politics once again trumps Jesus. It's as though some folks are afraid to trust Jesus and allow Him to fix things. Nope we have to do it ourselves no matter how hypocritical it makes the church look.

God has never intended for a President to be the answer. He is the answer.
 

righteousdude2

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
The corollary is to "vote for BHO" only if you believe you have to vote for either evil.


The only reason to vote for either is because politics once again trumps Jesus. It's as though some folks are afraid to trust Jesus and allow Him to fix things. Nope we have to do it ourselves no matter how hypocritical it makes the church look.

Did I miss something? Do we not ive in a democracy, and in a democracy people vote for who shall lead them.

I have never voted for the leader believing they can be the end all to all our problems, but rather to beieve that our leaders be surrounded by our prayers in order to be responsive to God.

However, there are times in a democracy when leaders are not what they presented themselves to be, and it is time for the church to step in prayerfully, to affect changes. If we had not stepped in back in the late 30s, early 40s, Bruder, wenn die Menschheit nicht eingeschritten, um Hitler zu stoppen, würden wir alle tun das goosstep Spaziergang, sagt. "" Heil, mein Führer! "(Gegrüßet seist du, mein Führer!) Oder" Sieg Heil! "(Hagel Sieg!)." an die Führer, und Schädlingsbekämpfung eine andere Gruppe von Menschen, die die Juden mögen, spiegeln nicht die perfekte Rennen.

God has never intended for a President to be the answer. He is the answer.

Hate to tell you brother, but most believers believe this very thing!

 

Zaac

Well-Known Member
Did I miss something? Do we not ive in a democracy, and in a democracy people vote for who shall lead them.

You obviously missed something. No one said you couldn't vote for who you wanted to lead you. But spiritually speaking, it's the ultimate display of liberalism for a Christian to vote for a man who rejects Jesus Christ.

I have never voted for the leader believing they can be the end all to all our problems, but rather to beieve that our leaders be surrounded by our prayers in order to be responsive to God.

Okay. Still, it's the ultimate display of liberalism for a Christian to vote for a man who rejects Jesus Christ.

However, there are times in a democracy when leaders are not what they presented themselves to be, and it is time for the church to step in prayerfully, to affect changes. If we had not stepped in back in the late 30s, early 40s, Bruder, wenn die Menschheit nicht eingeschritten, um Hitler zu stoppen, würden wir alle tun das goosstep Spaziergang, sagt. "" Heil, mein Führer! "(Gegrüßet seist du, mein Führer!) Oder" Sieg Heil! "(Hagel Sieg!)." an die Führer, und Schädlingsbekämpfung eine andere Gruppe von Menschen, die die Juden mögen, spiegeln nicht die perfekte Rennen.

The church wasn't prayerfully trying to change anything by voting for a man who rejects Jesus Christ. What god was the church praying to that told them THAT was a good idea?



Hate to tell you brother, but most believers believe this very thing!


If most Believers believed that, they wouldn't have overwhelmingly voted for a man who rejects Jesus Christ. If Billy Graham's organization believed that they wouldn't have removed Mormonism from the list of cults.

True liberals situationally adjust their "convictions".
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Zaac

Well-Known Member
Anyone believe he is being honest when he says he doesn't like to talk politics?

Ahh don't get mad and want me to not talk about how the true liberals are those of ya whose behavior is so far off of Christ's.

Yall started the thread. I'm just pointing out what is REALLY liberal.
 
Top