Ronald Reagan was an abortionist too

[Scarlett O.]

Ya see, y'all defeated Zaac's arguments a long time ago. What you're trying to do now is get Zaac to admit he's wrong, and you're just not gonna be able to do that. He has more fun stirring things up.

Duly noted ..... Thank you for the gentle slap to the back of my head.

 

[Revmitchell]

Duly noted ..... Thank you for the gentle slap to the back of my head.

Zaac has done this since he first come on this board. He has never once backed up such claims and he always refuses too. It just means he doesn't know what in the world he is talking about.

 

[Crabtownboy]

Zaac has done this since he first come on this board. He has never once backed up such claims and he always refuses too. It just means he doesn't know what in the world he is talking about.

The pot calling the kettle black.

What does you reply have to do with the subject of the thread?

Should a woman be allowed an abortion if it will save her life?

 

[thisnumbersdisconnected]

Duly noted ..... Thank you for the gentle slap to the back of my head.

Like-uh this?

I needed one too. Thanks Don.

 

[Zaac]

The pot calling the kettle black.

What does you reply have to do with the subject of the thread?

Should a woman be allowed an abortion if it will save her life?

Absolutely nothing. I call it the round robin game. They get upset that I won't argue with them or try to prove anything to them. And then another one comes along and says you shut his argument down and that's why he's not defending what he said. And then they all agree and pat each other on the back, and then wallow in the collective wrong as though it's right.

I've found that the folks on this board and in conservative circles period seem to have a hive mind where all they do is pat each other on the back and laud one another when they have to convince themselves that wrong is right.

That's how they convinced themselves to support a Presidential candidate who is 100% against Jesus.

It's thr Great Gathering around of people to tell them what their itching ears want to hear. If they can surround themselves with enough folks to confirm that wrong is right, then they are okay.

Reagan was STILL just as much of an abortionist as was Mandela. And legislation signed by him affirmed the right to make a choice.

 

[church mouse guy]

Why would I stand before God and tell Him it's okay to murder? Being pro-choice doesn't say it's okay to murder. Being pro-choice means the person believes that a woman has the right to choose to murder or not.

So try as yall might to make being pro-choice a sin, you're BIBLICALLY absent a leg to stand on.

But this is why church folks stuck on issues can't seem to reach anyone. Yall don't listen. Somebody says abortion and yall immediately go on the defensive. Now because yall don't listen, you're telling folks that the choice is a sin and THAT is a sin.

We are not saying that choice is a sin--we are saying that murder and the advocating of murder is a sin. The leg that we stand on is Thou Shall Not Murder.

Of course, being pro-choice says that it is okay for the mother to murder the unborn child. That is what the US Supreme Court ruled--that murder is okay. That is part of the reason that the USA is called a neo-barbarian nation. Obama believes that if a baby is born alive during an abortion then the doctor should murder the baby anyway.

Really, Zaac, do you think that human sacrifice is okay?

 

[Crabtownboy]

We are not saying that choice is a sin--we are saying that murder and the advocating of murder is a sin. The leg that we stand on is Thou Shall Not Murder.

Seems a very liberal interpretation of that commandment.

I do not believe there is any verse in the Bible that uses the word abortion.

 

[Zaac]

We are not saying that choice is a sin--we are saying that murder and the advocating of murder is a sin.

If yall aren't saying the choice is a sin, then what are yall going on about. I sid being pro-choice was not a sin and yall on here having baby cows.

The leg that we stand on is Thou Shall Not Murder.

I stand on that leg too. Being pro-choice doesn't equate to committing a murder.

Of course, being pro-choice says that it is okay for the mother to murder the unborn child.

Being pro-choice says she gets to decide. It doesn't say that the decision will be correct.

That is what the US Supreme Court ruled--that murder is okay.

The SCOTUS has no say. God deemed what is/is not murder.

That is part of the reason that the USA is called a neo-barbarian nation. Obama believes that if a baby is born alive during an abortion then the doctor should murder the baby anyway.

Okay. Has nothing to do with this thread.

Really, Zaac, do you think that human sacrifice is okay?

What are you talking about? Did you read me saying that?

Yall really do go out of your ways to twist things in order to try and be right.

 

[Aaron]

From the posting rules:

In addition, topics and/or posts that seek to promote clearly unscriptural and controversial social and moral positions, such as abortion, are prohibited as well. The official position of The Baptist Board is that life begins at conception. Opinions, stated as fact, that would contradict the board's position on this issue will be edited or deleted entirely.​

Time to muzzle the DNC operatives: CBT and Zaac

 

[Crabtownboy]

From the posting rules:

In addition, topics and/or posts that seek to promote clearly unscriptural and controversial social and moral positions, such as abortion, are prohibited as well. The official position of The Baptist Board is that life begins at conception. Opinions, stated as fact, that would contradict the board's position on this issue will be edited or deleted entirely.​

Time to muzzle the DNC operatives: CBT and Zaac

Let's make it fair across the board then. Cutting food to the hungry and medical services to those in need is immoral. So they should not be allowed to be discussed as well.

Also, those using derogatory terms toward others on the board and those who use freely and loosely the word 'liar', 'socialist', Communist, Nazi, etc., and other such words should be warned not to use them and if they continue to be banned.

There is no reason people cannot disagree politely. Those who do not or will not I simply chalk it up to ignorance or worse.

So, let's be fair about all this.

OK?

 

[saturneptune]

What is the purpose of starting a thread that demeans the last decent President this nation has elected? Look at the string of clowns that have served in the office since. I do not think President Reagan has one thing to do with the 1973 Supreme Court decision making abortion legal. While President, Reagan's heart was to preserve life, and he had a Democrat Congress to deal with almost eight years.

Now, neither party has a stellar record when it comes to abortion. That is a fact. However, there is a difference. There is a difference between taking a sin that is a stench in the eyes of the Lord, and not only legalizing it, but promoting it, advertising it, and turning it from a shameful act we used to hide, to something to be proud of. This is the modern Democrat Party, and they have taken this sin and rubbed God's nose in it, after He has blessed this country like He has. On the other hand, and here is the difference, Republicans have never had the goal of eliminating the practice on both the state and federal level, as the political power and will is not there, but they have not promoted it, and have won several legal victories at the state and federal level to limit it or set the movement back. Not that God approves of either, but there is a difference.

What do all of you think Reagan could have done different, given that abortion is the law of the land, and that the Democrats controlled Congress? Reagan appointed several Supreme Court justices that slowed down the progression of the movement. Bush the Second also made two outstanding Supreme Court nominees that helped, Roberts and Alito.

We went through this last year, it sounds like a broken record with Romney. Yes, Romney signed bills that were pro abortion as governor. As the Presidential candidate, he clearly stated he had changed his mind. So, what is a Christian to do, believe Romney, where there was a chance of opposition, or vote for Obama, who you knew would take abortion and gay marriage to new heights?

I have never understood why digging up past Republican records justifies Democrats killing innocent babies today.

Say what you want about Reagan, he provided the leadership, inspiration, and direction this nation needed after the four year Chinese fire drill Carter ran. The biggest mistake Reagan made was picking Bush as VP, which started a whole string of poor to average Presidents.

All we can do is work within the Republican Party to demand an end of the practice. There is no other route. The Democrats are not going to change, and third parties at this point in time are worthless.

Actually, this thread is a disgrace.

 

[Revmitchell]

I have never understood why digging up past Republican records justifies Democrats killing innocent babies today.

Actually old Zaac is not diggin up past Republican records Reagan was a Democrat and a liberal at one time. Which has nothing to do with anything. But liberals like Zaac bring up things like this because they think it will silence criticism of abortionists, like Mandella and Obama. That is why.


Oh and they have nothing else so they have to reach for junk like this.

 

[Bro. Curtis]

There is no reason people cannot disagree politely. Those who do not or will not I simply chalk it up to ignorance or worse.

So, let's be fair about all this.

Were you ignorant to say there were White Supremacists affiliated with the Tea Party ? Or worse ? Was that your way of "disagreeing politely" with them ?

You are a hypocrite. You want different rules for you than everyone else.

 

[Crabtownboy]

Actually old Zaac is not diggin up past Republican records Reagan was a Democrat and a liberal at one time.

At one time, but he switched quite a few years before he was elected president. So, whatever point you were trying to make is wrong.

And he did move the GOP to the Southern Policy which was racist as it played on White racial fears.

 

[Crabtownboy]

Were you ignorant to say there were White Supremacists affiliated with the Tea Party ? Or worse ? Was that your way of "disagreeing politely" with them ?

Actually it is true, but you will never accept that.

You are a hypocrite. You want different rules for you than everyone else.

And this is the type of language that is not needed in a civilized discussion.

 

[Bro. Curtis]

Actually it is true, but you will never accept that.

Where is your proof ?

And this is the type of language that is not needed in a civilized discussion.

Your moral high ground is only in your mind. Everyone here knows how nasty and dishonest you can be.

 

[Crabtownboy]

Where is your proof ?

As I said, you would never accept the fact, so there is no way to prove it to your satisfaction. After all there are still people who believe the world is flat and others who believe our going to the moon was a Hollywood production.

Your moral high ground is only in your mind.

Are you admitting moral low ground?

Everyone here knows how nasty and dishonest you can be.

And how often have I called you a nasty name or how often have I compared one of your posts to excrement?

I would say in defense of you that I do not believe you know any better.

 

[Bro. Curtis]

As I said, you would never accept the fact, so there is no way to prove it to your satisfaction. After all there are still people who believe the world is flat and others who believe our going to the moon was a Hollywood production.

And as I said, you are a chicken dung coward. You make an accusation you know you can't prove, so you blame me. Typical.

Are you admitting moral low ground?

You obviously cannot read, either. That gives me the intellectual high ground, as well

And how often have I called you a nasty name or how often have I compared one of your posts to excrement?

I REALLY have to tell you accusing someone of being affiliated with white Supremacists is a nasty comment ? Surely you are not that stupid. are you ? Telling me I don't value my wife's life isn't an insult, in your eyes ?

I would say in defense of you that I do not believe you know any better.

I would say you are a moral and spiritual weakling.

 

[Squire Robertsson]

Closed with prejudice.