Post #2
Ohev Yisrael Today, 06:31 AM Post #72
It is interesting how Christians have been conditioned to have this stigma against anything "Jewish." The only Jews most Christians know anything about are the Pharisees, and even then they really don't anything about the Pharisees, who they were, or what was really going on between them and Jesus, and this has led to a lot of misunderstanding. This misunderstanding has led to a lot of false conclusions about what Jesus was condemning when He confronted the Jewish leadership concerning things like the Sabbath, hand washing and a variety of other issues.
First of all, Jesus/Yeshua was a Pharisee. The Pharisees were the Torah teachers, the Rabbis. How do you suppose it was that they called Him "Rabbi?" It was not because he was an able public speaker. "Rabbi" is an earned title, like "professor" or "Dr." In those days, you had to study, under another Rabbi and/or attend one of the academies of the day, to attain this title. Only another Rabbi could confer this upon you.
The Pharisees numbered in the tens of thousands in first century, making them the single largest religious sect in Israel. There 9 different orders of Pharisees, each one thought the other eight were morons. Religious debate was very common among the different schools of Pharisees. Two of the most famous schools were the school of Shammai and the School of Hillel. Hillel would have been an early contemporary of Jesus. It is believed by some that he probably died when Jesus was still a boy.
When we closely examine what Jesus said, we see echos of the Talmud. In fact, when Jesus said, "The Sabbath is made for man, not man for the Sabbath," He was actually taking that remark from the Talmud. It says in the Talmud: Rabbi Jonathan ben Joseph said: For it is holy unto you; I.e., it [the Sabbath] is committed to your hands, not you to its hands. - Talmud: Yoma 85b
There are other things that Jesus said which echo Talmudic flavor. As a Jew, Jesus would have been familiar with the Talmud as any Jew would. Study of Talmud has always been the responsibility of every Jew, not just the Rabbis.
When Jesus debated the Pharisees about the Sabbath, one must understand that it was simply a Rabbinic debate that was not at all uncommon. What made Jesus' debates so interesting, the reason people marvelled at Jesus when He confronted the Pharisees, was his Galilean origins. The Rabbis of Galilee were not considered as educated as the Rabbis trained at the more sophisticated academies in Jerusalem. So for Jesus to stump the more "educated" men from Jerusalem was a sight to behold. It just was not every day that a Galilean Rabbi scored as many points as this one did. I am sure these confrontations must have took on some entertainment value for those looking on.
When it comes to the Sabbath, Jesus was confronting NOT the Sabbath itself, but the legalism and hypocrisy that SOME of the Pharisees employed regarding its observance. Jesus was not against the observance of the Sabbath, but the way some of the Pharisees expected the common man to live under their legalistic burdens, while finding loopholes for themselves that would excuse their need to follow the rules they imposed on everyone else, while still maintaining their deceptive, outward piety.
Jesus also confronted the Pharisees when they trumped up charges against Jesus for healing on the Sabbath, when even they knew that healing was not forbidden, and in fact, NO good deed was prohibited on the Sabbath, according to the Talmud. He exposed them for misapplying Sabbath simply as means of smearing Him and His ministry.
Jesus was not a Sabbath breaker, Paul was not a Sabbath, breaker, and neither were any of the disciples. Unfortunately, the modern Church has not made the necessary moral distinctions between condemning the legalistic practices employed by some in their misguided approach to the Sabbath, and the Sabbath itself. Too often in the minds of many, Sabbath = Legalistic. It is almost a knee-jerk reaction. As a result, so many Christians miss the beautiful pictures, and the important lessons it contains.
The Sabbath is important to understand because as a day sanctified by God, it teaches us the importance of the difference between the holy and the secular. It teaches us that there is a distinction, and that which is holy is not to be treated as common. We have not learned that lesson, and even when it is pointed out it is labeled a legalistic. We as Christians should be different, and we should be noticeably different. We should be different in our speech, our attitudes, conduct, our appearance, everything. We are a people set apart, sanctified and too often we prefer to blur lines that separate us from the world. Just as the Sabbath is not just another day like the other six, we are not just another group of people, we do not serve just another religious figure. We are Kings and Priests, servants of the very Creator of universe, and we should conduct ourselves as such. That is a very important lesson of the Sabbath.
If you do not want to observe the Sabbath day, that is your prerogative. Please do not condemn, or attempt to demonize as "legalistic" those who choose to observe the Sabbath. Please do not assign false values to them, and accuse them of trying to earn their salvation, or something. Such charges are plainly false. If you do not want to bother studying about the Sabbath, please do not presume that you have the right to sit in self-righteous judgement over something you do not understand.
--------------------
I have set watchmen upon thy walls, O Jerusalem, which shall never hold their peace day nor night: ye that make mention of the LORD, keep not silence, And give him no rest, till he establish, and till he make Jerusalem a praise in the earth.
(Isaiah 62:6-7)
The LORD shall bless thee out of Zion: and thou shalt see the good of Jerusalem all the days of thy life.
(Psalms 128:5)
Pray for the peace of Jerusalem: they shall prosper that love thee.
(Psalms 122:6)