drfuss said:
drfuss: You ask a very good, pertinent question. In a way, it is the same as my question.
Concerning the Priesthood, consider Ex. 19:5,6. Israel was chosen to be a Kingdom of Priests and a holy nation. I guess a question would be: Did God choose to have two Priesthood systems at the same time, or did He choose to replace the Melchisedec system with the Israel law system during the time of the law?
Jesus replaced the law priesthood system on Calvary with a system after the order of Melchisedec.
Very good and solid answer…
Here is my take on it.
I believe Melchizedek king of Salem to be a type of Christ. We know Abram paid tithes and knew God via this priesthood. This was the priesthood of Abraham the father of the faith. We're not told where this priesthood came from but I can’t see God dissolving or replacing a priesthood especially if I am right and Melchizedek is a type of Christ.
In this logic I don’t believe the Levitical priesthood ever replaced or even was a superior priesthood for several reasons.
1. We know the law as the symbol of works. Salvation was never by works and was always through faith. Heb. 11 teaches this clearly. All those that were saved were saved by faith. Without faith you cannot please God no matter how many laws you keep. So this means the Levitical priesthood, being represented by the law, was not a means to salvation (Heb. 5:11). The blood of bulls and goats could not save. Faith is and always was what saved.
2. Israel looked forward to the Messiah. A Messiah who was always to come from the priesthood of Melchizedek (ps. 110:4 & ps. 76:2 [remember, Melchizedek was king of Salem])
3. Heb 7:5 teaches us that the Levitical priesthood staid faithful to the laws from the priesthood of Melchizedek. I don’t believe they staid faithful to the laws of a priesthood that no longer existed.
4. Heb 9:11 seems to imply this type of Christ, the priesthood of Melchizedek, from which Christ himself revealed the priesthood of his persona of savior was a “greater and more perfect tabernacle” not made with hands.
Consider all the people who knew God via the priesthood of Melchizedek, what happened to them when Abraham came on the scene? We can’t think Abraham was the only tither he had in the pews. Where did everyone else go? What about their descendants? They were not from the loins of Abraham yet their forefathers had this God, did they suddenly stop believing? Did God suddenly stop being their God?
So my conclusion is not that there was a dual, parallel or second priesthood but that the Levitical priest stemmed or branched from the priesthood of Melchizedek just as Christ did. The priesthood of Melchizedek was always the root.
I further believe the writer of Hebrews, whom ever you feel it was, was writing to the Jews rationalizing that they should not forget the father of the faith had a priest whose God made us this promise and that the promise has been delivered out of that same priesthood. It was that God who made us this promise and it is that God who gave us this messiah.
Could a Gentile be saved within the Jewish faith? You don’t have to look any further than Ruth for that answer. Was their Gentile salvation outside Israel? I’d say God has always been partial to faith. I don't think the law was replaced but rather fulfilled or satisfied.