Justified Saint
New Member
No, what that means is that he strays from and doesn't fully conform to the beliefs of Catholic doctrine, I think Singer would agree with that 100%. 
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
It is simple, very simple. That is what baffles me--that you cannot grasp such a basic and simple concept.Originally posted by Justified Saint:
DHK - I really like your name, so I am going to help you out on this one. Baptism is a work of GRACE not a work of the LAW or OUR work. Look at v 10, God has prepared and set aside works for us so that we may do them. Eph 2:8-9 is talking about OUR works, works that let us BOAST contrasting them with v 10 about the works of GOD, FAITH, and GRACE. It's really a simple concept.
Now, how is that even possible. What is grace? Grace is free unmerited favor. It is a free gift undeservedly received from God. Baptism is not a gift from God. I have never seen God baptize anyone. He is neither the baptized nor the baptizer. When you get baptized it is done by a priest (not God). That makes it a work of man. God has no part in it. You may be doing it in obedience to God, but it is not God doing it; it is man doing it--it is a work of man, not of God. Therefore it is not of grace but of works.Baptism is a work of grace.
Yes, how true!Originally posted by Kathryn:
The simple is too simple for some:
"For it is God which worketh in you both to will and to do of His good pleasure." Philippians 2:13
God Bless
In context it is even more complete and beautiful:Originally posted by Kathryn:
The simple is too simple for some:
"For it is God which worketh in you both to will and to do of His good pleasure." Philippians 2:13
God Bless
----------------------------
Yes, how true!
It is God that works in me. That is why it is grace. It is God that does the work. It is not me; it is God. Salvation is all of God. I have done nothing to merit salvation. It is that provides salvation, God that gives salvation, God that works salvation, God that does it all.
I only receive it by faith.
Works are an outcome of my salvation that I have received by faith alone.
DHK
Well here's a thought for you Brother Adam. If a person comes to saving faith in God and LOSES NOT THAT FAITH for the rest of his natural life, is that person not once saved always saved (OSAS)? Therefore OSAS IS TRUE for that person, YES or NO? If OSAS is true for one, is not OSAS true? OR, does OSAS have to be true for ALL in order for OSAS to be true?I've been playing "devil's advocate" for a while now, in hope that my Baptist (or even non-Catholic) brothers and sisters would be able to intellegently respond to the claims that salvation is not OSAS or Sole Fida. Instead, like MacArthur, it's been nothing but circular arguments, "scripture can't actually mean that because it's not what I believe" and other very hollow arguments. Worst of all, the flaming, misrepresentations, and bad attitudes have been a horrible witness.
But is it false for all or only for the one who loses the faith?Originally posted by Justified Saint:
Ok Yeslew, the person loses salvation and now it's false.
Bearing fruit is making the seed that makes more like yourself.Originally posted by Bro. Curtis:
But define "bear fruit". Does it mean eternal life in heaven, or does it refer to soul winning ?
(Bear fruit = production of more seed)
Well here's a thought for you Brother Adam. If a person comes to saving faith in God and LOSES NOT THAT FAITH for the rest of his natural life, is that person not once saved always saved (OSAS)? Therefore OSAS IS TRUE for that person, YES or NO? If OSAS is true for one, is not OSAS true? OR, does OSAS have to be true for ALL in order for OSAS to be true?Originally posted by Yelsew:
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />I've been playing "devil's advocate" for a while now, in hope that my Baptist (or even non-Catholic) brothers and sisters would be able to intellegently respond to the claims that salvation is not OSAS or Sole Fida. Instead, like MacArthur, it's been nothing but circular arguments, "scripture can't actually mean that because it's not what I believe" and other very hollow arguments. Worst of all, the flaming, misrepresentations, and bad attitudes have been a horrible witness.
So does the possibility of sin exist while one is in the covenant? The wage of sin is death! So if one who is in the covenant sins, the wage received would be death. That does not prove the covenant false, it simply proves that the one who is saved can sin. In the same manner one who is saved in accordance with their faith can truly lose salvation by failing to continue in faith. Thus we have the doctrine of perseverence. Those who persevere to the end shall be saved. Those who fall away will not be saved.The principle of OSAS states that once a person gains there salvation, enters into the new covenant, they cannot, by any means of their own or others, lose their salvation. If a person can lose their inheritence in the Kingdom of God, than OSAS would prove false, even if a person entered the covenant and never left, as some did, OSAS still would not be true, because the possibility for them to leave the covenant existed. Right?