-
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Say something nice about Hillary
- Thread starter poncho
- Start date
She has all of her teeth.
Maybe they could be dentures.
She has misused finances with her charity and won't give full disclosure about it, but compared to her husbands crookedness she is a saint.
I doubt that she borrowed them.
In spite of her abrasive character she DOES NOT HAVE A WART ON THE END OF HER NOSE!
If that is not nice enough, tough! That's as far as I'm going.:1_grouphug:
If that is not nice enough, tough! That's as far as I'm going.:1_grouphug:
She has all of her teeth.
:thumbs: RollingOnFloorGuffawing!!!!!
This woman is not an image bearer of God, she is an image of self will and has no doubt, seeing the Clinton's profess to be Christians...had a long history of being exposed to the Gospel and the Word of God and chosen rather to associate with those opposed to the will of God.
That is another image altogether.
God bless.
Genesis says you are wrong. I will take God's word over yours!
poncho said:
The way the sweat glistens on her cankle fat reminds me of a beautiful starry night.
You might read it again and look for that part where Adam's descendants are clearly not created in the image and likeness of God.
https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Genesis+5:1-3&version=KJV
And I apologize for not posting the passage itself. On a tablet and haven't figured out how to copy and paste from Bible gateway.
And I encourage you to take God's Word over mine, though I also encourage keeping it in its proper context.
Hilary Clinton is not an image of God, but an image of the spirit of Antichrist.
God bless.
C'mon, be nice. Hilary doesn't have any cankles. Let's keep the facts straight.
God bless.
She's somewhat computer savvy, for example, she knows how to completely wipe an email server.
So, verse 3 completely negates verse 1? Completely negates the previous chapters of Genesis? Talk about picking and choosing and not understanding context. I am obviously not the one that needs to reread Genesis!
And your understanding ascribes a relationship between Hilary Clinton and God. James can help you with your effort, lol:
https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=James+3:9&version=KJV
There you go...another prooftext.
Now if you can just reconcile your defense of Hilary with the rest of God's Word, perhaps you might deny my assessment of Hilary and show it in error.
Genesis 5 illustrates the difference of Adam, created in the image and likeness of God, and his descendants...fallen, born in the image of their forebears. James points out man's unique design, but James doesn't ignore the fact that man is born out of relationship with God.
Hilary is not an image bearer of God, she is an image bearer of fallen man. That is not a political opinion, that is Biblical fact.
I often mention in discussion our unique design separates us from animals, but I do not imply that men are any less in need of reconciliation because of that.
You and I are born in the image and likeness of our fathers, and being saved we are being conformed to the image of Christ.
Nobody can hear about Hilary and think she has the slightest association with the will of God. She advocates murder, homosexuality, and idolatry.
Feel free to obscure the facts if you like, I won't. I do agree she should benefit from the love of Christ, and if I ever get the chance to witness to her I will.
But I will not agree that "Hilary is an image bearer of God."
God bless.