• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

SCOTUS tosses out Obama birth suit

Status
Not open for further replies.

Magnetic Poles

New Member
As we all knew it would, the Supreme Court of the United States threw out a case regarding President-Elect Barack Obama's credentials to serve based on natural born citizenship, thus ending the ridiculous grasping at straws by the nutty right.

CLICK HERE

This part pretty well sums it up:
Factcheck.org reproduced an announcement of Obama's birth, including his parents' address in Honolulu, that was published in the Honolulu Advertiser on Aug. 13, 1961.
 

Magnetic Poles

New Member
Revmitchell said:
You should really get your facts straight as to who brought the suit.
You should really read the article before spouting off. There are two appeals pending...well, make that one left that will end up the same way.
 

tinytim

<img src =/tim2.jpg>
I thought a Hillary supporter brought that suit...

You mean that Obama is so far left, that it makes Hillary supporters look like they are the "nutty right?"
 

Bro. Curtis

<img src =/curtis.gif>
Site Supporter
20081108NirthCertifikit.jpg



Courtesy of those "nutty right" looneys at Little Green Footballs.
 

LeBuick

New Member
There were a ton of other suites to include Alan Keys. The one thrown out today was not the Berg who was the Hillary supporter. Berg also has suites against McCain and accused Bill Clinton of murder. I think he is a brick or two shy...
 

Revmitchell

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Magnetic Poles said:
You should really read the article before spouting off. There are two appeals pending...well, make that one left that will end up the same way.


You, my friend are spouting off and do not know your facts. What is nutty is calling the wrong people nutty. The article doesn't identify anyone as "the nutty right". You did and wrongly at that.
 

windcatcher

New Member
Magnetic Poles said:
As we all knew it would, the Supreme Court of the United States threw out a case regarding President-Elect Barack Obama's credentials to serve based on natural born citizenship, thus ending the ridiculous grasping at straws by the nutty right.

CLICK HERE

This part pretty well sums it up:
Factcheck.org reproduced an announcement of Obama's birth, including his parents' address in Honolulu, that was published in the Honolulu Advertiser on Aug. 13, 1961.
Selective reasoning????????

Looks like the business is still unfinished! From the same site:
At least one other appeal over Obama's citizenship remains at the court. Philip J. Berg of Lafayette Hill, Pa., argues that Obama was born in Kenya, not Hawaii as Obama says and the Hawaii secretary of state has confirmed.

Berg says Obama also may be a citizen of Indonesia, where he lived as a boy. Federal courts in Pennsylvania have dismissed Berg's lawsuit. Federal courts in Ohio and Washington state have rejected similar lawsuits.

I'm sure the fat lady will sing soon.
 

Magnetic Poles

New Member
Revmitchell said:
You, my friend are spouting off and do not know your facts. What is nutty is calling the wrong people nutty. The article doesn't identify anyone as "the nutty right". You did and wrongly at that.
Poor Mitch...still has a comprehension problem. I didn't say the suit was brought by anyone on the right. I said it should END the hopes of those on the nutty right using this as an issue. You know, your community college may have a class to help your reading comprehension. Please show where I identified anyone as being on the nutty right.

Thanks, I knew you couldn't.
 

Revmitchell

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Magnetic Poles said:
Poor Mitch...still has a comprehension problem. I didn't say the suit was brought by anyone on the right. I said it should END the hopes of those on the nutty right using this as an issue. You know, your community college may have a class to help your reading comprehension. Please show where I identified anyone as being on the nutty right.

Thanks, I knew you couldn't.


thus ending the ridiculous grasping at straws by the nutty right.

This is an accusation against those on the right. You know it, I know it, and so does everyone else.
 

Magnetic Poles

New Member
Revmitchell said:
This is an accusation against those on the right. You know it, I know it, and so does everyone else.
Let's see if we can put it in simple terms you can understand...

People on two sides can bring similar actions to the court, even though they are bitter rivals.
The court throws out litigant "A"'s case. This means that the probability of litigant "B" making any headway with a similar argument is nil. SO again, show where I identified anyone as the "nutty right" other than this action will effectively end their hopes.
 

LeBuick

New Member
windcatcher said:
Selective reasoning????????

Looks like the business is still unfinished! From the same site:


I'm sure the fat lady will sing soon.

I'll give you a hint how the Berg suite will come out...

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2008/aug/28/lawsuit-questions-obamas-eligibility-for-office/

He has filed suits for clients against President Bush and Vice President Dick Cheney, claiming they knew about the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks before they happened. He also publicly asked Supreme Court Justices Clarence Thomas, Antonin Scalia and Sandra Day O'Connor to disbar themselves for their decision in the controversial 2001 case Bush v. Gore.
 

Revmitchell

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Magnetic Poles said:
Let's see if we can put it in simple terms you can understand...

People on two sides can bring similar actions to the court, even though they are bitter rivals.
The court throws out litigant "A"'s case. This means that the probability of litigant "B" making any headway with a similar argument is nil. SO again, show where I identified anyone as the "nutty right" other than this action will effectively end their hopes.


AGAIN...............

thus ending the ridiculous grasping at straws by the nutty right.

Insinuating that this will end the hopes of the nutty right itself makes the accusation. You spoke to quickly out of emotion and will not admit it. You should just admit your false accusation.
 

Magnetic Poles

New Member
Revmitchell said:
AGAIN...............



Insinuating that this will end the hopes of the nutty right itself makes the accusation. You spoke to quickly out of emotion and will not admit it. You should just admit your false accusation.
Once again, you embarrass yourself. Amazing. Truly amazing. You well know that many of the nutty fringe right are pulling for Obama to be found ineligible over this fabrication. Your disingenuousness and false accusations against me are unbecoming of a so-called Rev. It doesn't matter how many times you repeat your nonsense, it remains....nonsense.

And true to form, when you are intellectually impotent to discuss an issue, you derail with your lunacy by running off on some inane tangent.
 

Revmitchell

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Magnetic Poles said:
Once again, you embarrass yourself. Amazing. Truly amazing. You well know that many of the nutty fringe right are pulling for Obama to be found ineligible over this fabrication. Your disingenuousness and false accusations against me are unbecoming of a so-called Rev. It doesn't matter how many times you repeat your nonsense, it remains....nonsense.

And true to form, when you are intellectually impotent to discuss an issue, you derail with your lunacy by running off on some inane tangent.

I called you on a false statement. You returned with a personal attack. When you are caught in your misrepresentations you make it as personal as you can. The tangent began in your op and your false accusation of the so called "nutty right".
 

Magnetic Poles

New Member
Revmitchell said:
I called you on a false statement. You returned with a personal attack. When you are caught in your misrepresentations you make it as personal as you can. The tangent began in your op and your false accusation of the so called "nutty right".
Looks like we touched that raw nerve again. No personal attack...just pointing out your typical M.O. of derail, attack, and basically making a fool of yourself. You don't need me to do that for you.
 

Magnetic Poles

New Member
Also, I request a mod close this thread. It has been damaged beyond redemption by the derail attempt. I see no lucid debate occurring after this.
 

Revmitchell

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Magnetic Poles said:
Looks like we touched that raw nerve again. No personal attack...just pointing out your typical M.O. of derail, attack, and basically making a fool of yourself. You don't need me to do that for you.

First you cannot admit your false accusation in the op and then you cannot admit the personal attack.
 

Bro. Curtis

<img src =/curtis.gif>
Site Supporter
We all know MP plays at the fringes, his insults don't count, he can call any conservative any name, and he has a very thin skin when the shoe is on the other foot. This thread reminds me of when he didn't call us racists.

Just like Obama, nothing changes. This will probably get edited, but I don't mean it as an attack, but an observation.
 

windcatcher

New Member
Magnetic Poles said:
Once again, you embarrass yourself. Amazing. Truly amazing. You well know that many of the nutty fringe right are pulling for Obama to be found ineligible over this fabrication. Your disingenuousness and false accusations against me are unbecoming of a so-called Rev. It doesn't matter how many times you repeat your nonsense, it remains....nonsense.

And true to form, when you are intellectually impotent to discuss an issue, you derail with your lunacy by running off on some inane tangent.

You, MP, are a flat out liar! when there is probably no other poster more 'nutty fringe right' as I.......... and I don't give a whit about who's in the WH at this point.

I certainly do not support a fabrication.... for the office or to throw a man out of office......which is more than you have ever said.

So you're wrong and you've offended me on both counts... calling names and falsely suggesting the hope for fabrication!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top