-
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Scriptural proof for...........
- Thread starter Anti-Alexandrian
- Start date
AVL1984
<img src=../ubb/avl1984.jpg>
I agree Stephan. But, I'm wondering if C4K would do that. Two so far have no grasp on the reality of the subject and really seem to foul things up for everyone...Michelle and psr.2. If they were gone, maybe we could have a real discussion about the subject at hand without the thread being hijacked. Trolls in abundance was the reason I left another forum...A moderator here knows which one I am speaking of. That was my whole reason for coming back to the BB. It was a more controlled environment. So far it been mostly an enjoyable experience.
AVL1984
AVL1984
you forgot to mention that He forbids ADDING to His words.
You cannot prove that the MVs have omitted words and verses, the MV supporters cannot prove that the KJV has added words and verses.
It is a matter of conviction.
You cannot know the condition of the heart of one who says that they choose this Bible or that Bible because... (fill in the blank).
You may suspect but you cannot know, only God know for certain "...for man looketh on the outward appearance, but the LORD looketh on the heart".
Even our own hearts "The heart is deceitful above all things, and desperately wicked: who can know it?"
HankD
Michelle:This entire paragraph is incorrect.
No, it isn't. Your take of it is.
My understanding of this issue comes from God.
No, it doesn't, as your posts reveal. It comes from your guesswork.
I never even heard of this SDA person.
Read and learn:
http://www.tegart.com/brian/bible/kjvonly/doug/kjvoroots.html
Then, check out the veracity of the statements therein. I assure,you, I HAVE, and I've also read EVERY BOOK mentiones in this article, including that of Wilkinson. That's why I can truthfully say you don't know what you're talking about.
My understanding of this issue does not come from men, but God revealing the truth to me from the scriptures.
No, it doesn't. It comes from your guesswork and imaginations of what you'd LIKE for the Scriptures to say.
The modern versions have altered/changed the true words of God. This is a FACT.
No, it's NOT a fact. It's your circular reasoning and guesswork.
You need to come off the label of "King James Version" and look to the words of and in the label, and then just maybe you will understand. This is not version against version.
Yes, it is. In your circular reasoning, you say, "The KJV is automatically right because it's the KJV. This version's wrong cuz it aint the KJV. Therefore the KJV is the only correct version cuz it's the KJV."
WE are talking about the very words of God in our language to which have been ALTERED/CHANGED/OMITTED in the modern versions, to which God warns not to do.
No, we're talking about your guesswork and fantasies.
Please give us your scriptural support, that God would allow errors in his word of truth, the scriptures? You have yet to provide it, and you never will because God has said the OPPOSITE of this.
Be glad to...AFTER YOU PROVIDE SCRIPTURAL SUPPORT FOR THE KJVO MYTH.
No, it isn't. Your take of it is.
My understanding of this issue comes from God.
No, it doesn't, as your posts reveal. It comes from your guesswork.
I never even heard of this SDA person.
Read and learn:
http://www.tegart.com/brian/bible/kjvonly/doug/kjvoroots.html
Then, check out the veracity of the statements therein. I assure,you, I HAVE, and I've also read EVERY BOOK mentiones in this article, including that of Wilkinson. That's why I can truthfully say you don't know what you're talking about.
My understanding of this issue does not come from men, but God revealing the truth to me from the scriptures.
No, it doesn't. It comes from your guesswork and imaginations of what you'd LIKE for the Scriptures to say.
The modern versions have altered/changed the true words of God. This is a FACT.
No, it's NOT a fact. It's your circular reasoning and guesswork.
You need to come off the label of "King James Version" and look to the words of and in the label, and then just maybe you will understand. This is not version against version.
Yes, it is. In your circular reasoning, you say, "The KJV is automatically right because it's the KJV. This version's wrong cuz it aint the KJV. Therefore the KJV is the only correct version cuz it's the KJV."
WE are talking about the very words of God in our language to which have been ALTERED/CHANGED/OMITTED in the modern versions, to which God warns not to do.
No, we're talking about your guesswork and fantasies.
Please give us your scriptural support, that God would allow errors in his word of truth, the scriptures? You have yet to provide it, and you never will because God has said the OPPOSITE of this.
Be glad to...AFTER YOU PROVIDE SCRIPTURAL SUPPORT FOR THE KJVO MYTH.
NaasPreacher (C4K)
Well-Known Member
I wish defining a troll was that easy. This thread never had a real basis to start with - there is no Bible evidence for the source of manuscripts.
New 5 page rule.
Thread closed.
New 5 page rule.
Thread closed.