Nicholas25
New Member
How do we who have not believed in eternal security or OSAS, to interpret the verse in Ephesians that says we are sealed until the day of redemption? Thanks.
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Nicholas25: How do we who have not believed in eternal security or OSAS, to interpret the verse in Ephesians that says we are sealed until the day of redemption?
Eph 4:30 And grieve not the Holy Spirit of God, whereby ye are sealed unto the day of redemption.
JerryL: I have nothing in me that will hold me. I see no other option than God holding me.
Nicholas25: I am at a point of learning, and do not claim to have all the answers.
Heavenly Pilgrim said:
HP: I can appreciate your comment. :thumbsup: I am over twice as old as you and am certainly still learning on a daily basis. None of us have all of the answers. Just the same, amidst all the questions and uncertainties that we might have, there is some truth that we can be absolutely certain of. God blames and punishes man for disobedience and praises him for obedience. This is irrefutable evidence that man is no puppet nor a mere victim of his circumstances. It is irrefutable evidence that man has a free will to choose and must retain ones freewill as long as he is a moral agent and is to be held accountable and blamed or praised for his actions. Hold fast to that truth.
If OSAS is true, man has no free will. If man cannot do something other than what he does under the same set of circumstances, no choice can be predicated. If man is aware of anything concerning himself, he is aware of his ability to either choose to obey or choose to disobey. Deny as one wills that free will exists, man’s conscience testifies undeniably to the fact he has a free will, and can do despite any moral influence upon him.
HP: I have a proposition for you. Put his arguments in your own words and we can debate them on the list. I will do my best as time is available. Fair enough?JerryL: I am in no way smart enough to debate this subject. Arminianism vs. Calvinism will never be answered this side of Heaven. I't been going on for hundreds of years. HP, Maybe you could try the refute option of Piper's book. I would love to read stuff like that so it would better help people to learn a few options on the C/A debate
I have no desire whatsoever to debate the C/A stuff. I am sure John could debate his stance much better than I.Heavenly Pilgrim said:
HP: I have a proposition for you. Put his arguments in your own words and we can debate them on the list. I will do my best as time is available. Fair enough?
JerryL; I have no desire whatsoever to debate the C/A stuff. I am sure John could debate his stanse much better than I.
"Eph 4:30 And grieve not the Holy Spirit of God, whereby ye are sealed unto the day of redemption."
"....whereby ye are sealed unto the day of redemption."
"And grieve not the Holy Spirit of God...,"
HP: Hundreds? Why stop there? Why not make it thousands. All it takes is a few presuppositions read into the text and I am certain one could almost any text do. :smilewinkgrin:D28guy; That is, imo, one of the best scriptures of the hundreds that support the truth of our complete eternal security.
Quote:D28guy: It not only clearly proclaims our security...
HP: And how does it do that? Does it state that one cannot turn from their righteousness, or that one cannot make shipwreck of their faith, or one fail the grace of God, or one fall away or depart from God? Again, you seem to be reading into the text what you desire for it to say via presuppositions applied to the text while conveniently ignoring other pertinent truths of Scripture.D28guy: But it also acknowledges that our security is not disturbed by our imperfections and problems...
D28guy; Its a glorious promise, and is supported by so many other passages of scripture.
"You were once darkness, but now you are light in the Lord. Walk as children of light."
JettyL: Refute this verse HP, it comes from the same book freewillers live and die by.
Heb 7:25 Therefore He is able also to save forever those who draw near to God through Him, since He always lives to make intercession for them.
If God is the one that is able and in many verses says he will, then He who is able will do it. We could get into a C/A talk with the last part of your post, "If in fact one draws near to God does that indicate that one could not depart from the Living God", I'm not willing to go there. You are using "what if's" as your arguments, use a Bible. I could come up with any number of what if's for any given verse. That doesn't negate what God actually says in the verse. I think maybe you followed Nicholas from one board that totally believes in "losing salvation" to post the same arguments he would get there. Why don't we go upstairs where there are more OSAS people reading the threads? "General Baptist Discussions and Baptist Theology" and get more people involved. Most people upstairs never even bother to look down here.Heavenly Pilgrim said:
HP: Let me just ask you a question and see if you, believing as you obviously do, could give us the argument of those not believing in OSAS.
Does ‘being able’ to do something mean that everything one can do will in the end be accomplished? If in fact one draws near to God does that indicate that one could not depart from the Living God, make shipwreck of the faith, or leave ones first love?
Is the list starting to get the picture of some of the presuppositions one using this verse to support OSAS approaches this text and ‘hundreds more’ with? I certainly do.
LarryL: If God is the one that is able and in many verses says he will, then He who is able will do it. We could get into a C/A talk with the last part of your post, "If in fact one draws near to God does that indicate that one could not depart from the Living God", I'm not willing to go there.
LarryL: You are using "what if's" as your arguments, use a Bible.
LarryF: I think maybe you followed Nicholas from one board that totally believes in "losing salvation" to post the same arguments he would get there.
LarryL: Why don't we go upstairs where there are more OSAS people reading the threads? "General Baptist Discussions and Baptist Theology" and get more people involved. Most people upstairs never even bother to look down here.
Forgive me then, I thought you were coming from his "home" board. The "whats ifs" I spoke of were from this.Heavenly Pilgrim said:
HP: So now we have a new term for any warning God gives to us in Scripture. It is called a “what if.” If the reader will notice I only used real warnings from Scripture spoken to believers. With the presuppositions you are obviously holding to you ‘cannot go there,’ the ‘there’ being the Word of God and its clear warnings of departing from the Living God, making shipwreck of the faith, etc. The only way one can maintain a sure OSAS stance is to ignore or refuse to heed the warnings and conditions God places upon the believer.
HP: What right do you or anyone else have to malign or ignore the clear warnings in scripture, and imply that they are simply meaningless manufactured ‘what if’s?’ If only we would utilize the whole Word of God instead of simply applying your presuppositions to every text.
HP: What a ridiculous fantasy you are allowing to occupy your mind. I have not followed anyone to this list nor has anyone on this list followed me here. I have never to my knowledge conversed with any on this list from any other list with the ‘possible’ exception of one that I have not conversed with for months nor do I know them personally. Even this one possibility is only a possibility that it is the same individual I once spoke to on another list. I have not in any way tried to confirm it.
At any rate, dream on.
HP: Because I do not make the rules and choose to abide by the rules to the best of my understanding. I cannot in good faith say that I am a Baptist….. or any other denomination for that matter. Why don’t you go upstairs and give an open invitation to those desiring to debate the issues to where the owners have the list have asked us to stay? I would look forward to an opportunity to debate with any of them as time permits.
LarryF: Forgive me then, I thought you were coming from his "home" board. The "whats ifs" I spoke of were from this.
HP: "Does ‘being able’ to do something mean that everything one can do will in the end be accomplished? If in fact one draws near to God does that indicate that one could not depart from the Living God, make shipwreck of the faith, or leave ones first love?"