Well, steaver, apparently I owe you a big apology.
Laws identify what's acceptable and, hopefully, best for the society. To break that law is to harm society in some way.
Everyone still has the choice to think of only themselves, rather than thinking of others and how their actions affect others.
I've said enough about Zaac's erroneous argument. Outta here.
Christians AREN'T advocating for taking away choice. Laws do NOT remove choice. That's what makes this argument so stupid.That is why I said Christians shouldn't be advocating for taking away the choice that God says everyone has.
Laws identify what's acceptable and, hopefully, best for the society. To break that law is to harm society in some way.
Everyone still has the choice to think of only themselves, rather than thinking of others and how their actions affect others.
Does everyone see the "either-or" fallacy? In order for "You advocate God's way" to be true, the assumption must be that steaver is NOT advocating God's way, and is relying on man's laws. "Make disciples not laws" validates what steaver has said; and ignores that those whose hearts are hardened and will not change, will never be disciples, and necessarily need man's laws to protect the society.Make disciples not laws.
Let man's government do what they do. You advocate God's way.
I've said enough about Zaac's erroneous argument. Outta here.