Sunday School lesson 1/16/05 - continued
Luke 22:14-23 The Cup and the Bread
Luke’s description of the Supper is longer than the other Synoptic accounts. As we have witnessed various times in Luke, the meal is used as a time for instruction. The most noticeable difference in Luke’s account is the order of the elements which does not change the meaning of the Supper at all but explains some of the differences in liturgical practices among the various Christian communities.
The phrase “sat at the table” would be more accurately rendered “reclined at the table”.
Jesus’ introductory statement of verse 15-16 serves two purposes: (1) It shows that this meal alone stands between Him and His suffering. (2) It identifies the Last Supper with the Messianic Banquet, which Christ will share with His disciples in the coming Kingdom. This meal is a prophetic symbolism of what will be fulfilled in the Kingdom.
In verse 17 the sharing of the cup is believed to be a part of the Passover meal and not necessarily a part of the institution of the Lord’s Supper. The other Synoptics do not record this first passing of the cup. Though it would have been customary for each participant to have his own cup, the sharing from one vessel underlines the unity among the Disciples and Christ. It also demonstrates Jesus’ example of giving thanks to God for all food.
After the passing of the cup, he takes the loaf of bread and exclaims, “This is my Body.” This phrasing has caused one of the most hotly debated topics in Christendom. Some sects of Christianity believe that the bread and wine actually become the actual flesh and blood of Jesus. The term for this supposed miracle is transubstantiation and should be rejected after an examination of the text relating to this Supper. First of all, the underlying Aramaic which Christ spoke could just as readily be translated “This means my body.” Secondly, in the text at hand, Jesus is standing before the Disciples in real human form with His body intact. Thirdly, John states emphatically that Jesus’ body was not “broken” (John 19:36). In any case, the bread is shared by all the Disciples, an expression of the unity of the community created by the redemptive self-giving of the Son of man.
In verse 20, likewise the cup is passed with the commentary that it represents the New Testament, or Covenant brought about by the shedding of His blood. The Old Covenant was the Siniatic Covenant made with the Israelites when they were released from bondage. This along with the Passover tie the events of the Passion with the Old Testament and brings in the new era spoken of by Jeremiah in Jeremiah 31:31-34. Once again, to believe that the wine actually becomes blood is to be rejected and contradicts the instructions of the Law in Leviticus 3:17 and even pre-Law in Genesis 9:4.
In verse 21 Jesus makes the prediction of betrayal, strengthened and made worse by the fact that such would be committed by one who was in fellowship with Him at the table. The statement that this was “as it was determined” shows that such was a Divine necessity. However, the guilt of the betrayer is in no way diminished. Judas was not working to accomplish the Purpose of God but the purposes of evil men.