Thank goodness.
Now Merle Haggard or Roger Miller, on the other hand....
Seriously, most of those with inside knowledge of the situation, and who are not trying to defend Stanley at every point will say his own stubbornness and hardness played a major role in the breakup.
Whatever the details, it can be certain that both spouses played their own part in the drama. It is sure that Stanley was not just abandoned.
I'm not against divorced people in the pulpit at all. In fact, I think it's a great example if that person has been restored. But the troubling fact of this whole situation for me is that he said if his wife divorced him, he would step down.
Then it happened. He didn't.
My guess is he was just blowing smoke with his earlier statement, thinking or hoping it wouldn't come to divorce.
So when it happened, he suddenly found himself unwilling to live up to his statement, and after talking about it with those in power, probably decided that it would be okay.
We do know that his decision to stay further fractured his family, driving his son away from ministry in that fellowship.
It also bothers me that he's made claims about how his divorce has given him more credibility with those in his congregation. That's just a weird statement.
It really doesn't bother me that much, though. They can all follow their conscience. I think the man's teaching has long been theologically problematic, anyway. The divorce doesn't change that.