• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Should Charles Stanley Lead A Church?

Should Stanley Lead a Church?

  • Yes

    Votes: 13 40.6%
  • No

    Votes: 5 15.6%
  • It's up to the people who attend

    Votes: 6 18.8%
  • I don't care either way

    Votes: 3 9.4%
  • Not for me to judge

    Votes: 4 12.5%
  • I wouldn't attend

    Votes: 1 3.1%

  • Total voters
    32
  • Poll closed .

Thinkingstuff

Active Member
Thank goodness.

Now Merle Haggard or Roger Miller, on the other hand....

Seriously, most of those with inside knowledge of the situation, and who are not trying to defend Stanley at every point will say his own stubbornness and hardness played a major role in the breakup.

Whatever the details, it can be certain that both spouses played their own part in the drama. It is sure that Stanley was not just abandoned.

I'm not against divorced people in the pulpit at all. In fact, I think it's a great example if that person has been restored. But the troubling fact of this whole situation for me is that he said if his wife divorced him, he would step down.

Then it happened. He didn't.

My guess is he was just blowing smoke with his earlier statement, thinking or hoping it wouldn't come to divorce.

So when it happened, he suddenly found himself unwilling to live up to his statement, and after talking about it with those in power, probably decided that it would be okay.

We do know that his decision to stay further fractured his family, driving his son away from ministry in that fellowship.

It also bothers me that he's made claims about how his divorce has given him more credibility with those in his congregation. That's just a weird statement.

It really doesn't bother me that much, though. They can all follow their conscience. I think the man's teaching has long been theologically problematic, anyway. The divorce doesn't change that.
The rumor I heard from some missionary friends of mine was the Charles did not place a priority on his wife. He chose his ministry over her needs or desires. Which caused them to grow apart. Thats not to say his wife didn't play a role but there were some issues regarding priorities.
 

pinoybaptist

Active Member
Site Supporter
I much prefer Celtic (Irish and Scotish) music. The likes of Enya, Maire Brennan, Dougie Mclean. Oh, and I love big robust movie score music.

My wife used to have a lot of Celtic Thunder and Celtic Woman dvd's.
I particularly like the Celtic woman one.
 

Thinkingstuff

Active Member
I much prefer Celtic (Irish and Scotish) music. The likes of Enya, Maire Brennan, Dougie Mclean. Oh, and I love big robust movie score music.

Quantumfaith, I'm with you. However, that is not my choice of music while driving for any distance. I have to stick with the good ole rock and roll. I can't tell you the number of times I've been persecuted by Christians for listening to "new age" music. Though I often term it progressive Jazz. Good stuff to let the imagination fly and to relax to. I personally enjoy Clannad and sing to my self though I don't know gaelic I sing the words Loudly anyway. Back in the day I also liked Mary Black. Probably don't know her but she was and Irish singer that I enjoyed while "over there".
 

preachinjesus

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
The rumor I heard

That right there should stop this thread in its tracks. I'll mention my former point...I doubt anyone on this board has first hand knowledge of what actually happened and the circumstances around it. All discussion then is based on rumor and innuendo, neither of which should exist in a Gospel centered ministry.
 

Baptist Believer

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
I think we need to stop the speculation regarding the Stanley's marriage.

In my experience as someone in ministry who went through the trauma of divorce, I know firsthand that outright speculation regarding the reasons for the failure of a marriage are almost 100% incorrect, even if they seem to make sense from the outside and would explain both partner's actions.

I don't know how many times I was confronted, allegedly "according to Matthew 18", about being unfaithful to my wife by well-meaning seminarians and church members when I wasn't unfaithful to my wife at all (it was actually the other way around, although I didn't advertise it). These well-meaning people talked about how I needed to break up with my "girlfriend on the side" when such a person never existed. When I told them that I wasn't seeing anyone else (the last thing I wanted in my life at the time was another woman), they accused me of dishonesty. They couldn't even name an alleged girlfriend, only that they "had heard" I was being unfaithful.

I was so irritated by the situation, I didn't darken the door of a church for over a year because I was so sick of being beaten by lies and gossip in the midst of the rest of my lift falling apart.

FULL DISCLOSURE:
I benefited from Charles Stanley's ministry (books and radio) in the mid-1980s, although I differ from him in a number of ways. I do not hold currently hold him in high esteem, and believe he should have stepped down from his pastoral role because of his previous promise to do so and his personal need for healing and refocus.
 

Thinkingstuff

Active Member
That right there should stop this thread in its tracks. I'll mention my former point...I doubt anyone on this board has first hand knowledge of what actually happened and the circumstances around it. All discussion then is based on rumor and innuendo, neither of which should exist in a Gospel centered ministry.

You are absolutely right. However, we do know its percistance in the body of the very first believers. So, it should also be expected.
 

RevGKG

Member
“He who is without sin among you, let him throw a stone at her first.”

“Neither do I condemn you; go and sin no more.”
 

webdog

Active Member
Site Supporter
If what was reported to be true concerning his divorce, I believe he is scripturaly allowed to be an elder.

Now...if he said he would step down if there were a divorce, that muddies the water a bit. I can understand if he said this not knowing or understanding the requirements for being an elder, but as one already I don't know how that could be possible.
 

webdog

Active Member
Site Supporter
“He who is without sin among you, let him throw a stone at her first.”

“Neither do I condemn you; go and sin no more.”
I think you misunderstand the point of this thread. This is a spinoff on whether Ted Haggard should be allowed to pastor after his recent admission of being bi-sexual. Someone mentiond Stanley, and hence here we are.
 

luke1616

New Member
I think you misunderstand the point of this thread. This is a spinoff on whether Ted Haggard should be allowed to pastor after his recent admission of being bi-sexual. Someone mentiond Stanley, and hence here we are.
:thumbs: That is correct sir.:thumbs:
 

John Toppass

Active Member
Site Supporter
Getting here late but i just gotta ask. Can anyone tell me where the scripture says that divorce is ok?................................. Thus, there can not be a biblical divorce but I do read where divorce is addressed quickly in the scripture but it doesn't say anything good about it.
 

Tom Butler

New Member
Getting here late but i just gotta ask. Can anyone tell me where the scripture says that divorce is ok?................................. Thus, there can not be a biblical divorce but I do read where divorce is addressed quickly in the scripture but it doesn't say anything good about it.

John, I doubt if anybody will argue that divorce is okay (although dumping an abusive husband might have some positives to it). It is not the biblical ideal. The question here is whether or not a divorce disqualifies one from the pastorate--Dr. Stanley in particular.
 
Top