That's true. But I do not find any place in the NT where self preservation trumps loving your enemy.Justice and defense are two different things.
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
That's true. But I do not find any place in the NT where self preservation trumps loving your enemy.Justice and defense are two different things.
That's a bit of an over-simplification, Rolf, though I agree with much of the sentiment. Using historical figures to prove points opens up a new can of worms, though.
EDIT: Please note, this is in response to Post #38, with the picture Rolf posted.
That's true. But I do not find any place in the NT where self preservation trumps loving your enemy.
Defending oneself or another with the use of violence does not constitute hating the assailant.
Defending oneself or another with the use of violence does not constitute hating the assailant.
Defending oneself or another with the use of violence does not constitute hating the assailant.
Defending oneself or another with the use of violence does not constitute hating the assailant.
Added thought: I would also contend that allowing innocents to be attacked unchallenged shows a distinct lack of Christian love for them.
So you can shoot someone while loving them?
Added thought: I would also contend that allowing innocents to be attacked unchallenged shows a distinct lack of Christian love for them.
I agree. Good thing no one is advocating such a thing.
So you can shoot someone while loving them?
I agree. Good thing no one is advocating such a thing.
RLBosley - Just out of curiosity, did you ever use violence while correcting a child? By that, I mean, did you ever spank a child? I don't know your situation, so I have to ask. The world considers corporal discipline to be "violent," yet it is often done with love. This is one instance of violence being used without "hate."
Now, in the case of self-defense, it's often going to be hard to form an opinion of the attacker beyond the fact that they are attacking. We are allowed to take a stand against something, and merely doing so does not mean we hate the person responsible for the act we're standing against.
The point is a violent act can be used in a proper manner and it does not equate to hate. Jesus was, arguably, quite violent when He overthrew the tables of the moneychangers and made a whip to chase them out. Do you think that means Jesus hated those people? Or did He hate what they were doing and want to see them change their lives?
It's easily inferred that some people do advocate the stance Rolf posited. Some people seem to think any and all violence is expressly forbidden. Do you really believe God would have us stand idly by while someone injures or kills innocents (read: children)? I don't believe that to be so.
RLBosley - Just out of curiosity, did you ever use violence while correcting a child? By that, I mean, did you ever spank a child? I don't know your situation, so I have to ask. The world considers corporal discipline to be "violent," yet it is often done with love. This is one instance of violence being used without "hate."
Now, in the case of self-defense, it's often going to be hard to form an opinion of the attacker beyond the fact that they are attacking. We are allowed to take a stand against something, and merely doing so does not mean we hate the person responsible for the act we're standing against.
The point is a violent act can be used in a proper manner and it does not equate to hate. Jesus was, arguably, quite violent when He overthrew the tables of the moneychangers and made a whip to chase them out. Do you think that means Jesus hated those people? Or did He hate what they were doing and want to see them change their lives?
It's easily inferred that some people do advocate the stance Rolf posited. Some people seem to think any and all violence is expressly forbidden. Do you really believe God would have us stand idly by while someone injures or kills innocents (read: children)? I don't believe that to be so.
So you can let an innocent be attacked while loving them?
Where did I say or indicate that? In fact I just said that NNE is advocating that.
I have. But you can't seriously be trying to correlate corporal discipline to using lethal force.
Jesus not only said "don't hate" but "LOVE your enemies." Can you kill someone while loving them?
While overturning the tables could be understood as violent, I do not believe that Jesus harmed anyone there, nor does the text say he did.
Did I not just say that NNE (least of all me) is advocating that?
Not a direct correlation, no, but the fact remains that a Christian can commit an act of what the world would call "violence" and could do so without hating the recipient of the act.
Yes, it is possible to kill someone you love.
So, assuming she's still with us, you would kill your own mother if she broke into your house at 2 AM? I mean, she could be on drugs.
No, you wouldn't, because you love her. You would show mercy.
What an odd line of reasoning.
This thread is becoming borderline absurd.
It tells us why they needed the swords. For self defense. They were considered not only heretics, but as such traitors to Israel (IE numbered with the transgressors).What's the next verse say?