I ask this question because there are many times in our walk through this life where we are torn apart by someone, or many someone's, and while we may forgive, according to Scripture, is it always wise to forget from where the harm came from.
An example is in a marriage. A woman finally gets tired of being beaten senseless, and nearly to death, by an abusive spouse. They also grow tired of being emotionally and mentally abused to the point where they have no self esteem left within them.
After taking so much, and forgiving so much, they end the abuse through divorce. Regardless of what you feel about divorce, the question, here is not whether you are for or against divorce, BUT is it necessary for that abused spouse to forgive and forget? Alternatively, is it wise and prudent that they never forget from where they came in order to make a new, and better life for their self?
Let's say (hypothetically) that someone near and dear to you continuously robbed you blind through unpaid loans. Do you reach the point in that relationship where you forgive them for their lack of responsibility, but decide never to loan them money again?
Wouldn't it be part and parcel of forgiveness to forget the past deeds of that person, and let them continue to walk all over you by the name of forgiveness, or is right to forgive, but, never again turn your back on their behaviors?
This has always been something that I've had tossed in my face by those who came to me and exhausted the excuse of forgiving them. If I forgave them, then they'd throw it in my face that I should also not be holding their past behaviors against them, I as proceeded cautiously, not forgetting the ways in which they continuously burned me in, in the past?
I hope this gets some good feedback, as it is a dilemma for many believers. Do we forgive and continue to remain that persons doormat, or do we shake off the dust and move on down the path (Mark 6:11, and Luke 9:5)? Is Jesus telling His followers that there comes a time that we put that relationship behind us and move on? Alternatively, are those two verses a contradiction to the need to forgive?
Shalom,
Pastor Paul
An example is in a marriage. A woman finally gets tired of being beaten senseless, and nearly to death, by an abusive spouse. They also grow tired of being emotionally and mentally abused to the point where they have no self esteem left within them.
After taking so much, and forgiving so much, they end the abuse through divorce. Regardless of what you feel about divorce, the question, here is not whether you are for or against divorce, BUT is it necessary for that abused spouse to forgive and forget? Alternatively, is it wise and prudent that they never forget from where they came in order to make a new, and better life for their self?
Let's say (hypothetically) that someone near and dear to you continuously robbed you blind through unpaid loans. Do you reach the point in that relationship where you forgive them for their lack of responsibility, but decide never to loan them money again?
Wouldn't it be part and parcel of forgiveness to forget the past deeds of that person, and let them continue to walk all over you by the name of forgiveness, or is right to forgive, but, never again turn your back on their behaviors?
This has always been something that I've had tossed in my face by those who came to me and exhausted the excuse of forgiving them. If I forgave them, then they'd throw it in my face that I should also not be holding their past behaviors against them, I as proceeded cautiously, not forgetting the ways in which they continuously burned me in, in the past?
I hope this gets some good feedback, as it is a dilemma for many believers. Do we forgive and continue to remain that persons doormat, or do we shake off the dust and move on down the path (Mark 6:11, and Luke 9:5)? Is Jesus telling His followers that there comes a time that we put that relationship behind us and move on? Alternatively, are those two verses a contradiction to the need to forgive?
Shalom,
Pastor Paul