I'm not speaking of men who WON'T be trained because they are unwilling, I'm speaking of practical reality.
My pastor when I accepted the call WAS such a man who claimed that you had no need to go to school and due to his influance I dug my hole deeper before resolving to go.
But even then, it took me years - in fact, I was laid off from a long time job and unemployed for a year and came to the point where I was going to lose my house no matter what because I was so far behind, before I went to college because I had nothing else major to lose.
I have a wife who can't work, and two small children, and that past due mortgage which has grown almost 10K in fees and penalties in the last 2.5 years because I can't keep up the payments. If I had quit my job to go to college it would have been the highth of unbilbical irresponsibility (and I desperatly wanted to).
If I had taken night courses towards a degree, it would have taken me many many years to get what was offered and there would hav been several which could not be taken at night. Not to mention they were well outside my budget.
Spin it how you want, I in fact agree with you in principle, but the reality is, RARE will be the man called into the ministry after the age of 25 if you require only degree holders be called to the pulpit of a church.
that's gross idealism, IMO.
That said, an un-formaly-educated man called to serve a church which can provide him witrh even a modest regular income should make every sacrifice possible to get that education. I do not downplay it's importance as something to be strived for. But I stamd by my statement regarding practical reality.
And the thing about asking advanced degree ministers to accept low paying churches is another valid point I hadn't given much thought to. Weak and compromising it most certainly is, but many's the graduate, in my experience, who will not "settle" for the financial sacrifice of serving a low-budget church.
OTOH
While you speak of these churches a bit derisivly, it seems to me,the reality is these churches often serve a valid purpose. I know MANY doctorate holding ministers and almost to a man they sing the praises of the little country "family" church who allowed them to learn on the job while begining the long road to getting their degree.
Who loved them even when their inexperience led them to mess it up bigtime, who sacrificed to make sure he could keep house and home together while he made himself "respectable." Who gently guided him through the learning experiences that, no matter how many Church Admin courses you take, yo can only learn by doing - even by doing it wrong.
YES, there are some slef-absorbed power structure churches who are a pain to themselves and their pastors...so?
They are sinful humans and so are we. they fail and so do we. they need to hear from God just as we do.
I was given the oppertunity to preach at the church from which a good friend of mine had just resigned and he sang the praises of the church. I also heard that another loal church was looking for a minister and I ask our director of mission about the situation and he said to me "You don't want that church" and implied it was just the kind of church you seem to have in mind.
Well, it seems to me that SOMEBODY has to preach in that church, and either love it or scold it back into usefullness. It will no doubt be hard, heartbreaking work.
Should it therefore not be done?
I'll not tell God I'm wiling to preach in the nice peaceful one but not in the one in turmoil. That's up to Him. But I, for my part, am not willing to dismiss any church as not needing to exist anymore. If God wants it gone, he can arrange it just fine without our meddling.
Sorry...bit of a tangent there...last three paragraphs went right off topic...
Rant over.